在西班牙,违宪判决对立法者的约束力

Q3 Social Sciences
Elena María Escobar Arbeláez
{"title":"在西班牙,违宪判决对立法者的约束力","authors":"Elena María Escobar Arbeláez","doi":"10.18042/cepc/aijc.27.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to review Spanish doctrine and legislation in order to establish whether there is a prohibition that prevents legislative responses to unconstitutional judgments in Spain. In order to determine whether (or not) there is such a limit in Spanish constitutionalism, first of all, the paper verifies how the binding effect of unconstitutional sentences affects public authorities, in order to establish that it is implausible to sustain the same degree of binding, with respect to legal operators such as judiciary or public administration, and the legislative power. Subsequently, the paper faces the difference between the binding effect of un-constitutional judgments to lawmakers and the eventual prohibition – arises from that effect – for Parliaments that would prevent them offering legislative responses. Lastly, based on the above reflections, the possibilities of inter-institutional dialogue in Spain are explored.","PeriodicalId":38593,"journal":{"name":"Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El efecto vinculante de las sentencias de inconstitucionalidad frente al legislador en España\",\"authors\":\"Elena María Escobar Arbeláez\",\"doi\":\"10.18042/cepc/aijc.27.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to review Spanish doctrine and legislation in order to establish whether there is a prohibition that prevents legislative responses to unconstitutional judgments in Spain. In order to determine whether (or not) there is such a limit in Spanish constitutionalism, first of all, the paper verifies how the binding effect of unconstitutional sentences affects public authorities, in order to establish that it is implausible to sustain the same degree of binding, with respect to legal operators such as judiciary or public administration, and the legislative power. Subsequently, the paper faces the difference between the binding effect of un-constitutional judgments to lawmakers and the eventual prohibition – arises from that effect – for Parliaments that would prevent them offering legislative responses. Lastly, based on the above reflections, the possibilities of inter-institutional dialogue in Spain are explored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/aijc.27.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/aijc.27.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本条的目的是审查西班牙的学说和立法,以确定是否存在阻止西班牙对违宪判决作出立法回应的禁令。为了确定西班牙宪政是否存在这样的限制,首先,本文验证了违宪判决的约束力如何影响公共当局,以确定在司法或公共行政等法律经营者和立法权方面维持同样程度的约束力是不可信的。随后,该文件面临着不符合宪法的判决对立法者的约束力和最终对议会的禁令之间的差异,这两种禁令将阻止议会提供立法回应。最后,基于上述思考,探讨了在西班牙进行机构间对话的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El efecto vinculante de las sentencias de inconstitucionalidad frente al legislador en España
The purpose of this article is to review Spanish doctrine and legislation in order to establish whether there is a prohibition that prevents legislative responses to unconstitutional judgments in Spain. In order to determine whether (or not) there is such a limit in Spanish constitutionalism, first of all, the paper verifies how the binding effect of unconstitutional sentences affects public authorities, in order to establish that it is implausible to sustain the same degree of binding, with respect to legal operators such as judiciary or public administration, and the legislative power. Subsequently, the paper faces the difference between the binding effect of un-constitutional judgments to lawmakers and the eventual prohibition – arises from that effect – for Parliaments that would prevent them offering legislative responses. Lastly, based on the above reflections, the possibilities of inter-institutional dialogue in Spain are explored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信