土著科学的使用和滥用

IF 2 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Technical Communication Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.1080/10572252.2023.2210166

E. H. Pflugfelder, Olivia Goodfriend, C. Baker

{"title":"土著科学的使用和滥用","authors":"E. H. Pflugfelder, Olivia Goodfriend, C. Baker","doi":"10.1080/10572252.2023.2210166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Knowledge about the use of the term “Indigenous science” (IS) is valuable to technical and scientific communication in the larger goal of exposing colonial, appropriative legacies. Using rhetorical content analysis, we analyze 61 instances of IS in US-based news articles and find that IS is often represented as an ongoing activity, connected to food production, and related to higher education activities. However, IS is rarely defined and Indigenous people are not always cited/quoted.","PeriodicalId":45536,"journal":{"name":"Technical Communication Quarterly","volume":"32 1","pages":"276 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use and Misuse of Indigenous Science\",\"authors\":\"E. H. Pflugfelder, Olivia Goodfriend, C. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10572252.2023.2210166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Knowledge about the use of the term “Indigenous science” (IS) is valuable to technical and scientific communication in the larger goal of exposing colonial, appropriative legacies. Using rhetorical content analysis, we analyze 61 instances of IS in US-based news articles and find that IS is often represented as an ongoing activity, connected to food production, and related to higher education activities. However, IS is rarely defined and Indigenous people are not always cited/quoted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Communication Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"276 - 286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Communication Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Communication Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2210166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要关于“本土科学”（IS）一词的使用，对于揭示殖民地、专有遗产这一更大目标的技术和科学交流是有价值的。通过修辞内容分析，我们分析了61篇美国新闻文章中的信息系统实例，发现信息系统通常被描述为一种持续的活动，与食品生产有关，并与高等教育活动有关。然而，IS很少被定义，土著人也不总是被引用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Use and Misuse of Indigenous Science

ABSTRACT Knowledge about the use of the term “Indigenous science” (IS) is valuable to technical and scientific communication in the larger goal of exposing colonial, appropriative legacies. Using rhetorical content analysis, we analyze 61 instances of IS in US-based news articles and find that IS is often represented as an ongoing activity, connected to food production, and related to higher education activities. However, IS is rarely defined and Indigenous people are not always cited/quoted.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Technical Communication Quarterly COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

45.50%

发文量