我该留下还是离开？考察攻击性关系中的关系承诺指标

IF 0.5 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES

JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY Pub Date : 2018-10-02 DOI:10.1080/08952833.2018.1526511

Morgan Lancaster, Damon Rappleyea, J. Jensen, K. Didericksen

{"title":"我该留下还是离开？考察攻击性关系中的关系承诺指标","authors":"Morgan Lancaster, Damon Rappleyea, J. Jensen, K. Didericksen","doi":"10.1080/08952833.2018.1526511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The research on the sustainability of aggressive relationships has yet to investigate the way the appraisal process to “settle” (satisfice) or to seek the best option (maximize) in our relationships affects commitment. The purpose of this study was to examine how those who are in aggressive relationships balance relationship commitment with the tendency to satisfice or maximize. Results indicate that satisficing and structural constraints were strongly associated with relationship commitment within aggressive relationships. Implications for practitioners with an emphasis on safety, the gendered nature of power in relational decision making, and various contextual factors are explored.","PeriodicalId":44214,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","volume":"30 1","pages":"237 - 257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08952833.2018.1526511","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should I Stay or Go? Examining Indicators of Relationship Commitment in Aggressive Relationships\",\"authors\":\"Morgan Lancaster, Damon Rappleyea, J. Jensen, K. Didericksen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08952833.2018.1526511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The research on the sustainability of aggressive relationships has yet to investigate the way the appraisal process to “settle” (satisfice) or to seek the best option (maximize) in our relationships affects commitment. The purpose of this study was to examine how those who are in aggressive relationships balance relationship commitment with the tendency to satisfice or maximize. Results indicate that satisficing and structural constraints were strongly associated with relationship commitment within aggressive relationships. Implications for practitioners with an emphasis on safety, the gendered nature of power in relational decision making, and various contextual factors are explored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"237 - 257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08952833.2018.1526511\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2018.1526511\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2018.1526511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于攻击性关系可持续性的研究尚未调查在我们的关系中“解决”(满意)或寻求最佳选择(最大化)的评估过程如何影响承诺。本研究的目的是研究那些处于攻击性关系中的人如何平衡关系承诺与满足或最大化的倾向。结果表明，在攻击性关系中，满意度和结构性约束与关系承诺密切相关。对从业者的影响，强调安全，权力在关系决策中的性别性质，以及各种背景因素进行了探讨。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Should I Stay or Go? Examining Indicators of Relationship Commitment in Aggressive Relationships

ABSTRACT The research on the sustainability of aggressive relationships has yet to investigate the way the appraisal process to “settle” (satisfice) or to seek the best option (maximize) in our relationships affects commitment. The purpose of this study was to examine how those who are in aggressive relationships balance relationship commitment with the tendency to satisfice or maximize. Results indicate that satisficing and structural constraints were strongly associated with relationship commitment within aggressive relationships. Implications for practitioners with an emphasis on safety, the gendered nature of power in relational decision making, and various contextual factors are explored.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY FAMILY STUDIES-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy provides an international forum to further explore the relationship between feminist theory and family therapy theory and practice. The journal presents thought-provoking and insightful articles of a theoretical nature, as well as articles focusing on empirical research and clinical application. The Journal of Feminist Family Therapy critiques family therapy concepts from a feminist perspective with careful attention to cultural, class, and racial differences, applies a feminist-sensitive perspective to the treatment issues particular to women such as depression, agoraphobia, eating disorders, incest, and domestic abuse, etc.