马来西亚加强初级保健(EnPHC)干预对2型糖尿病管理的有效性:差异中的差异(DID)分析。

M. Husin, X. Teh, S. M. Ong, Y. Lim, Swee Hung Ang, C. Chan, M. Lim, S. Shanmugam, Noraziani Khamis, Faeiz Syezri Adzmin Jaafar, Norliza Ibrahim, N. Nasir, D. Kusuma, A. Wagner, D. Ross-Degnan, R. Atun, S. Sivasampu
{"title":"马来西亚加强初级保健(EnPHC)干预对2型糖尿病管理的有效性:差异中的差异(DID)分析。","authors":"M. Husin, X. Teh, S. M. Ong, Y. Lim, Swee Hung Ang, C. Chan, M. Lim, S. Shanmugam, Noraziani Khamis, Faeiz Syezri Adzmin Jaafar, Norliza Ibrahim, N. Nasir, D. Kusuma, A. Wagner, D. Ross-Degnan, R. Atun, S. Sivasampu","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-154502/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nTo evaluate the effectiveness of the Enhanced Primary Healthcare (EnPHC) interventions on process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis was a quasi-experimental controlled study conducted in 20 intervention and 20 control public primary care clinics in Malaysia from November 2016 to June 2019. Type 2 diabetes patients aged 30 years and above were selected via systematic random sampling. Outcomes include process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes. Difference-in-differences analyses was conducted.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe reviewed 12,017 medical records of patients with type 2 diabetes. Seven process of care measures improved: HbA1c tests (odds ratio (OR) 3.31, 95% CI 2.13, 5.13); lipid test (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.64, 7.97), LDL (OR 4.33, 95% CI 2.16, 8.70), and urine albumin (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.12, 3.55) tests; BMI measured (OR 15.80, 95% CI 4.78, 52.24); cardiovascular risk assessment (OR 174.65, 95% CI 16.84, 1810.80); and exercise counselling (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04, 1.33). We found no statistically significant changes in intermediate clinical outcomes (i.e. HbA1c, LDL, HDL and BP control).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEnPHC interventions was successful in enhancing the quality of care, in terms of process of care, by changing healthcare providers behaviour.","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Enhanced Primary Healthcare (EnPHC) interventions on Type 2 diabetes management in Malaysia: Difference-in-differences (DID) analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M. Husin, X. Teh, S. M. Ong, Y. Lim, Swee Hung Ang, C. Chan, M. Lim, S. Shanmugam, Noraziani Khamis, Faeiz Syezri Adzmin Jaafar, Norliza Ibrahim, N. Nasir, D. Kusuma, A. Wagner, D. Ross-Degnan, R. Atun, S. Sivasampu\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/RS.3.RS-154502/V1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS\\nTo evaluate the effectiveness of the Enhanced Primary Healthcare (EnPHC) interventions on process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThis was a quasi-experimental controlled study conducted in 20 intervention and 20 control public primary care clinics in Malaysia from November 2016 to June 2019. Type 2 diabetes patients aged 30 years and above were selected via systematic random sampling. Outcomes include process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes. Difference-in-differences analyses was conducted.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nWe reviewed 12,017 medical records of patients with type 2 diabetes. Seven process of care measures improved: HbA1c tests (odds ratio (OR) 3.31, 95% CI 2.13, 5.13); lipid test (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.64, 7.97), LDL (OR 4.33, 95% CI 2.16, 8.70), and urine albumin (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.12, 3.55) tests; BMI measured (OR 15.80, 95% CI 4.78, 52.24); cardiovascular risk assessment (OR 174.65, 95% CI 16.84, 1810.80); and exercise counselling (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04, 1.33). We found no statistically significant changes in intermediate clinical outcomes (i.e. HbA1c, LDL, HDL and BP control).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nEnPHC interventions was successful in enhancing the quality of care, in terms of process of care, by changing healthcare providers behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-154502/V1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-154502/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估强化初级保健(EnPHC)干预措施对2型糖尿病患者护理过程和中期临床结果的有效性。方法这是一项准实验对照研究,于2016年11月至2019年6月在马来西亚的20家干预和20家对照公立初级保健诊所进行。通过系统随机抽样选择年龄在30岁及以上的2型糖尿病患者。结果包括护理过程和中期临床结果。进行了差异中的差异分析。结果我们查阅了12017份2型糖尿病患者的病历。改善了七项护理过程测量:HbA1c测试(比值比(OR)3.31,95%CI 2.13,5.13);脂质测试(OR 4.59,95%CI 2.64,7.97)、低密度脂蛋白(OR 4.33,95%CI 2.16,8.70)和尿白蛋白(OR 1.99,95%CI 1.12,3.55)测试;测量的BMI(OR 15.80,95%CI 4.78,52.24);心血管风险评估(OR 174.65,95%CI 16.84810.80);和运动咨询(OR 1.18,95%CI 1.04,1.33)。我们发现中间临床结果(即HbA1c、LDL、HDL和BP对照)没有统计学上的显著变化。结论nPHC干预措施通过改变医疗保健提供者的行为,在护理过程方面成功地提高了护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Enhanced Primary Healthcare (EnPHC) interventions on Type 2 diabetes management in Malaysia: Difference-in-differences (DID) analysis.
AIMS To evaluate the effectiveness of the Enhanced Primary Healthcare (EnPHC) interventions on process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS This was a quasi-experimental controlled study conducted in 20 intervention and 20 control public primary care clinics in Malaysia from November 2016 to June 2019. Type 2 diabetes patients aged 30 years and above were selected via systematic random sampling. Outcomes include process of care and intermediate clinical outcomes. Difference-in-differences analyses was conducted. RESULTS We reviewed 12,017 medical records of patients with type 2 diabetes. Seven process of care measures improved: HbA1c tests (odds ratio (OR) 3.31, 95% CI 2.13, 5.13); lipid test (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.64, 7.97), LDL (OR 4.33, 95% CI 2.16, 8.70), and urine albumin (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.12, 3.55) tests; BMI measured (OR 15.80, 95% CI 4.78, 52.24); cardiovascular risk assessment (OR 174.65, 95% CI 16.84, 1810.80); and exercise counselling (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.04, 1.33). We found no statistically significant changes in intermediate clinical outcomes (i.e. HbA1c, LDL, HDL and BP control). CONCLUSIONS EnPHC interventions was successful in enhancing the quality of care, in terms of process of care, by changing healthcare providers behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信