真实盈余管理、公司治理与股价崩盘风险:来自中国的证据

Yuan-hui Li, Yezen H. Kannan, Stephen E. Rau, Shun-Wen Yang
{"title":"真实盈余管理、公司治理与股价崩盘风险:来自中国的证据","authors":"Yuan-hui Li, Yezen H. Kannan, Stephen E. Rau, Shun-Wen Yang","doi":"10.1108/cafr-03-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to provide additional insights on the association between real earnings management (REM) and crash risk, particularly from the perspective of an emerging market economy. It also examines the moderation role that internal and external corporate governance may play in this area.Design/methodology/approachRelying on archival data from the RESSET and CSMAR databases over a timeframe from 2010 to 2018 of China listed company, the authors test the hypotheses by regressing common measures of crash risk on the treatment variable (REM) and crash risk control variables identified in the prior crash risk literature. The authors also introduce monitoring proxies (internal controls as an internal governance and institutional ownership as an external governance) and assess how effective internal and external governance moderate the relation between REM and stock price crash risk.FindingsThe results suggest firms with higher REM have a significantly greater stock price crash risk, and that this association is mitigated by external monitoring. That is, greater institutional ownership, particularly pressure insensitive owners, mitigates the impact of REM on stock price crash risk. However, internal control does not mitigate the association between REM and stock price crash risk.Originality/valueFollowing the passage of the Sarbanes–Oxley (SOX) Act, prior research has documented an increase in the use of REM and a positive association between REM and cash risk. The authors demonstrate that they persist in one of the largest emerging markets where institutional regulations, market conditions and corporate behaviors are different from those in developed markets. Also, the assessment of the moderation effect of internal and external governance mechanisms could have meaningful implications for investors and regulators in Chinese and other emerging markets.","PeriodicalId":68382,"journal":{"name":"中国会计与财务研究","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real earnings management, corporate governance and stock price crash risk: evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Yuan-hui Li, Yezen H. Kannan, Stephen E. Rau, Shun-Wen Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cafr-03-2022-0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to provide additional insights on the association between real earnings management (REM) and crash risk, particularly from the perspective of an emerging market economy. It also examines the moderation role that internal and external corporate governance may play in this area.Design/methodology/approachRelying on archival data from the RESSET and CSMAR databases over a timeframe from 2010 to 2018 of China listed company, the authors test the hypotheses by regressing common measures of crash risk on the treatment variable (REM) and crash risk control variables identified in the prior crash risk literature. The authors also introduce monitoring proxies (internal controls as an internal governance and institutional ownership as an external governance) and assess how effective internal and external governance moderate the relation between REM and stock price crash risk.FindingsThe results suggest firms with higher REM have a significantly greater stock price crash risk, and that this association is mitigated by external monitoring. That is, greater institutional ownership, particularly pressure insensitive owners, mitigates the impact of REM on stock price crash risk. However, internal control does not mitigate the association between REM and stock price crash risk.Originality/valueFollowing the passage of the Sarbanes–Oxley (SOX) Act, prior research has documented an increase in the use of REM and a positive association between REM and cash risk. The authors demonstrate that they persist in one of the largest emerging markets where institutional regulations, market conditions and corporate behaviors are different from those in developed markets. Also, the assessment of the moderation effect of internal and external governance mechanisms could have meaningful implications for investors and regulators in Chinese and other emerging markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国会计与财务研究\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国会计与财务研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-03-2022-0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国会计与财务研究","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cafr-03-2022-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文的目的是提供更多关于实际盈余管理(REM)与崩溃风险之间关系的见解,特别是从新兴市场经济的角度来看。它还考察了内部和外部公司治理在这一领域可能发挥的调节作用。设计/方法论/方法基于中国上市公司2010年至2018年RESSET和CSMAR数据库的档案数据,作者通过对先前碰撞风险文献中确定的治疗变量(REM)和碰撞风险控制变量的常见碰撞风险度量进行回归来检验假设。作者还介绍了监控代理(内部控制作为内部治理,机构所有权作为外部治理),并评估了有效的内部和外部治理如何调节快速眼动与股价暴跌风险之间的关系。研究结果表明,REM较高的公司股价暴跌风险明显更大,外部监控可以缓解这种关联。也就是说,更大的机构所有权,特别是对压力不敏感的所有者,减轻了快速眼动对股价暴跌风险的影响。然而,内部控制并不能减轻快速眼动与股价暴跌风险之间的关联。独创性/价值随着《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》的通过,先前的研究记录了快速眼动的使用增加,以及快速眼动与现金风险之间的正相关。作者证明,他们坚持在最大的新兴市场之一,那里的制度法规、市场条件和企业行为与发达市场不同。此外,评估内部和外部治理机制的适度效应可能会对中国和其他新兴市场的投资者和监管机构产生有意义的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real earnings management, corporate governance and stock price crash risk: evidence from China
PurposeThe aim of this paper is to provide additional insights on the association between real earnings management (REM) and crash risk, particularly from the perspective of an emerging market economy. It also examines the moderation role that internal and external corporate governance may play in this area.Design/methodology/approachRelying on archival data from the RESSET and CSMAR databases over a timeframe from 2010 to 2018 of China listed company, the authors test the hypotheses by regressing common measures of crash risk on the treatment variable (REM) and crash risk control variables identified in the prior crash risk literature. The authors also introduce monitoring proxies (internal controls as an internal governance and institutional ownership as an external governance) and assess how effective internal and external governance moderate the relation between REM and stock price crash risk.FindingsThe results suggest firms with higher REM have a significantly greater stock price crash risk, and that this association is mitigated by external monitoring. That is, greater institutional ownership, particularly pressure insensitive owners, mitigates the impact of REM on stock price crash risk. However, internal control does not mitigate the association between REM and stock price crash risk.Originality/valueFollowing the passage of the Sarbanes–Oxley (SOX) Act, prior research has documented an increase in the use of REM and a positive association between REM and cash risk. The authors demonstrate that they persist in one of the largest emerging markets where institutional regulations, market conditions and corporate behaviors are different from those in developed markets. Also, the assessment of the moderation effect of internal and external governance mechanisms could have meaningful implications for investors and regulators in Chinese and other emerging markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信