监控技术的转让和最终用途的侵犯人权行为

Q3 Social Sciences

International Human Rights Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1163/22131035-12020001

E. Carpanelli

{"title":"监控技术的转让和最终用途的侵犯人权行为","authors":"E. Carpanelli","doi":"10.1163/22131035-12020001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article focuses on the transfer of surveillance technology that is used to commit human rights violations and questions the international responsibility of the technology-exporting State, that is the State where the seller is based and that authorises the transfer. After having clarified that the technology-exporting State cannot be considered the principal wrongdoer for the human rights abuses committed in the receiving State, it investigates whether its international responsibility for end-use human rights abuses could be determined out of complicity or if due diligence may serve the same purpose.","PeriodicalId":13730,"journal":{"name":"International Human Rights Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transfer of Surveillance Technology and End-Use Human Rights Abuses\",\"authors\":\"E. Carpanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22131035-12020001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article focuses on the transfer of surveillance technology that is used to commit human rights violations and questions the international responsibility of the technology-exporting State, that is the State where the seller is based and that authorises the transfer. After having clarified that the technology-exporting State cannot be considered the principal wrongdoer for the human rights abuses committed in the receiving State, it investigates whether its international responsibility for end-use human rights abuses could be determined out of complicity or if due diligence may serve the same purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Human Rights Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Human Rights Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-12020001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Human Rights Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-12020001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是用于侵犯人权的监视技术的转让，并质疑技术出口国的国际责任，即卖方所在国和批准转让的国家。在澄清了技术出口国不能被认为是在接受国侵犯人权的主要违规者之后，它调查了它对侵犯最终用途人权的国际责任是否可以通过共谋来确定，或者是否可以通过适当的努力来达到同样的目的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Transfer of Surveillance Technology and End-Use Human Rights Abuses

This article focuses on the transfer of surveillance technology that is used to commit human rights violations and questions the international responsibility of the technology-exporting State, that is the State where the seller is based and that authorises the transfer. After having clarified that the technology-exporting State cannot be considered the principal wrongdoer for the human rights abuses committed in the receiving State, it investigates whether its international responsibility for end-use human rights abuses could be determined out of complicity or if due diligence may serve the same purpose.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Human Rights Law Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Human Rights Law Review (HRLR) is a bi-annual peer-reviewed journal. It aims to stimulate research and thinking on contemporary human rights issues, problems, challenges and policies. It is particularly interested in soliciting papers, whether in the legal domain or other social sciences, that are unique in their approach and which seek to address poignant concerns of our times. One of the principal aims of the Journal is to provide an outlet to human rights scholars, practitioners and activists in the developing world who have something tangible to say about their experiences on the ground, or in order to discuss cases and practices that are generally inaccessible to European and NorthAmerican audiences. The Editors and the publisher will work hands-on with such contributors to help find solutions where necessary to facilitate translation or language editing in respect of accepted articles. The Journal is aimed at academics, students, government officials, human rights practitioners, and lawyers working in the area, as well as individuals and organisations interested in the area of human rights law. The Journal publishes critical articles that consider human rights law, policy and practice in their various contexts, at global, regional, sub-regional and national levels, book reviews, and a section focused on an up-to-date appraisal of important jurisprudence and practice of the UN and regional human rights systems including those in the developing world.