新兴服务工作机器人化的机会公平性

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tuuli Turja
{"title":"新兴服务工作机器人化的机会公平性","authors":"Tuuli Turja","doi":"10.1108/jwl-11-2021-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn a best-case scenario, both organisations and their employees gain from technological changes by staying up to date on developing digitalisation. However, opportunities to learn and use modern technologies may not be shared equally in the workplace. Employee groups can be divided between those with and without access to new technologies. This study aims to examine the extent to which the position of an employee may be associated with the opportunity to work with robots.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nHealth-care work was chosen as an exemplary context of emerging robotisation. To gain correlative evidence on how the position and technology orientation of an employee associate with access to care robots, the study used online survey data collected from Finnish care workers (N = 226).\n\n\nFindings\nWorkplace hierarchies were found to play a significant part in robotisation. Management experience increased the probability for an employee to have access to care robots, but this position did not differentiate between the employees in their aspiration to use care robots. Individual interest in technology was associated with robot use only among care workers with no management experience, whereas managers’ access to robots did not depend on their personal interests.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study brings new information about the equity of robot-use opportunities in workplaces. Distinctive to care robots was the significant number of motivated non-users. Thus, adding to the categories of “have-bots”, “have-nots” and “want-nots”, this study introduces an important group of “want-bots”.\n","PeriodicalId":47077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Workplace Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The equity of opportunities in emerging service work robotisation\",\"authors\":\"Tuuli Turja\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jwl-11-2021-0153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn a best-case scenario, both organisations and their employees gain from technological changes by staying up to date on developing digitalisation. However, opportunities to learn and use modern technologies may not be shared equally in the workplace. Employee groups can be divided between those with and without access to new technologies. This study aims to examine the extent to which the position of an employee may be associated with the opportunity to work with robots.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nHealth-care work was chosen as an exemplary context of emerging robotisation. To gain correlative evidence on how the position and technology orientation of an employee associate with access to care robots, the study used online survey data collected from Finnish care workers (N = 226).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nWorkplace hierarchies were found to play a significant part in robotisation. Management experience increased the probability for an employee to have access to care robots, but this position did not differentiate between the employees in their aspiration to use care robots. Individual interest in technology was associated with robot use only among care workers with no management experience, whereas managers’ access to robots did not depend on their personal interests.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study brings new information about the equity of robot-use opportunities in workplaces. Distinctive to care robots was the significant number of motivated non-users. Thus, adding to the categories of “have-bots”, “have-nots” and “want-nots”, this study introduces an important group of “want-bots”.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Workplace Learning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Workplace Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-11-2021-0153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Workplace Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-11-2021-0153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在最好的情况下,组织和员工都可以通过保持最新的数字化发展,从技术变革中获益。然而,学习和使用现代技术的机会在工作场所可能并不平等。员工群体可以分为能接触到新技术的和不能接触到新技术的两类。本研究旨在研究员工的职位可能与机器人工作的机会有关的程度。设计/方法/方法卫生保健工作被选为新兴机器人化的范例。为了获得员工的职位和技术取向如何与护理机器人的使用相关联的相关证据,该研究使用了从芬兰护理工作者(N = 226)收集的在线调查数据。研究发现,工作场所的等级制度在机器人化过程中发挥了重要作用。管理经验增加了员工接触到护理机器人的可能性,但这个职位并没有区分员工对使用护理机器人的渴望。个人对技术的兴趣只与没有管理经验的护理人员使用机器人有关,而管理人员对机器人的使用并不取决于他们的个人兴趣。独创性/价值这项研究带来了关于工作场所使用机器人机会公平性的新信息。护理机器人的独特之处在于,它们有相当多的主动不使用机器人。因此,除了“have-bots”、“have-nots”和“want-nots”这三个类别之外,本研究还引入了一个重要的“want-bots”群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The equity of opportunities in emerging service work robotisation
Purpose In a best-case scenario, both organisations and their employees gain from technological changes by staying up to date on developing digitalisation. However, opportunities to learn and use modern technologies may not be shared equally in the workplace. Employee groups can be divided between those with and without access to new technologies. This study aims to examine the extent to which the position of an employee may be associated with the opportunity to work with robots. Design/methodology/approach Health-care work was chosen as an exemplary context of emerging robotisation. To gain correlative evidence on how the position and technology orientation of an employee associate with access to care robots, the study used online survey data collected from Finnish care workers (N = 226). Findings Workplace hierarchies were found to play a significant part in robotisation. Management experience increased the probability for an employee to have access to care robots, but this position did not differentiate between the employees in their aspiration to use care robots. Individual interest in technology was associated with robot use only among care workers with no management experience, whereas managers’ access to robots did not depend on their personal interests. Originality/value This study brings new information about the equity of robot-use opportunities in workplaces. Distinctive to care robots was the significant number of motivated non-users. Thus, adding to the categories of “have-bots”, “have-nots” and “want-nots”, this study introduces an important group of “want-bots”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Workplace Learning
Journal of Workplace Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The Journal of Workplace Learning aims to provide an avenue for the presentation and discussion of research related to the workplace as a site for learning. Its scope encompasses formal, informal and incidental learning in the workplace for individuals, groups and teams, as well as work-based learning, and off-the-job learning for the workplace. This focus on learning in, from and for the workplace also brings with it questions about the nature of interventions that might assist the learning process and of the roles of those responsible directly or indirectly for such interventions. Since workplace learning cannot be considered without reference to its context, another aim of the journal is to explore the organisational, policy, political, resource issues and other factors which influence how, when and why that learning takes place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信