在911凶杀电话欺骗侦查过程中线索的(错误)利用

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
P. Markey, Erika Feeney, Brooke Berry, Alec Martin, Erica B. Slotter
{"title":"在911凶杀电话欺骗侦查过程中线索的(错误)利用","authors":"P. Markey, Erika Feeney, Brooke Berry, Alec Martin, Erica B. Slotter","doi":"10.1177/10887679221129850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study explored cue utilization during 911 homicide calls to better understand deception detection in this high-risk situation. A sample of 93 participants judged the deceptiveness of a random subset of 110 homicide calls placed to 911. A separate group of raters coded 86 different cues expressed by each 911 caller. Results indicated that judges were unable to detect deception accurately. While judges appeared to utilize some cues correctly when assessing callers’ deception, subsequent analyses found that judges likely had difficulty detecting deception because they failed to utilize emotionally related cues correctly.","PeriodicalId":51586,"journal":{"name":"Homicide Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The (Mis)utilization of Cues During Deception Detection in 911 Homicide Calls\",\"authors\":\"P. Markey, Erika Feeney, Brooke Berry, Alec Martin, Erica B. Slotter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10887679221129850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study explored cue utilization during 911 homicide calls to better understand deception detection in this high-risk situation. A sample of 93 participants judged the deceptiveness of a random subset of 110 homicide calls placed to 911. A separate group of raters coded 86 different cues expressed by each 911 caller. Results indicated that judges were unable to detect deception accurately. While judges appeared to utilize some cues correctly when assessing callers’ deception, subsequent analyses found that judges likely had difficulty detecting deception because they failed to utilize emotionally related cues correctly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Homicide Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Homicide Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221129850\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homicide Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221129850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了911凶杀呼叫中的线索利用,以更好地理解在这种高风险情况下的欺骗检测。93名参与者对拨打911的110个凶杀电话中随机抽取的一部分进行了判断。另一组评分员对每个911呼叫者表达的86种不同线索进行编码。结果表明,法官不能准确地发现欺骗。虽然法官在评估来电者的欺骗行为时似乎正确地利用了一些线索,但随后的分析发现,法官可能难以发现欺骗行为,因为他们未能正确利用与情感相关的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The (Mis)utilization of Cues During Deception Detection in 911 Homicide Calls
The current study explored cue utilization during 911 homicide calls to better understand deception detection in this high-risk situation. A sample of 93 participants judged the deceptiveness of a random subset of 110 homicide calls placed to 911. A separate group of raters coded 86 different cues expressed by each 911 caller. Results indicated that judges were unable to detect deception accurately. While judges appeared to utilize some cues correctly when assessing callers’ deception, subsequent analyses found that judges likely had difficulty detecting deception because they failed to utilize emotionally related cues correctly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Homicide Studies
Homicide Studies CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Homicide Studies is an interdisciplinary, international publication dedicated to the dissemination of empirical research addressing issues pertinent to the study of homicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信