马尔科姆兄弟、金博士和黑人权力——一个密切而互补的阅读

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Earle J. Fisher
{"title":"马尔科姆兄弟、金博士和黑人权力——一个密切而互补的阅读","authors":"Earle J. Fisher","doi":"10.1080/14769948.2020.1833968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rev. Albert Cleage’s contemporary and counterpart, Dr. James Hal Cone, emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a premier academic voice in Black theology. Cone and Cleage’s collegiality is complicated. Yet, their works on Black theology and Black power complement each other when read in contrast. This essay looks intently at excerpts from Cleage’s sermons, “Brother Malcolm,” and “Dr. King and Black Power” and puts them in conversation with excerpts from Cone’s book “Martin and Malcolm in America.” This work shows the variance in perspectives and theological convictions, as well as the rhetorical strategies employed by Cleage and Cone to make their case for the most faithful engagement to Malcolm and Martin’s contributions to civil rights, Black power, and Black theology.","PeriodicalId":42729,"journal":{"name":"BLACK THEOLOGY","volume":"18 1","pages":"263 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14769948.2020.1833968","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brother Malcolm, Dr. King, and Black Power – A Close and Complementary Reading\",\"authors\":\"Earle J. Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14769948.2020.1833968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Rev. Albert Cleage’s contemporary and counterpart, Dr. James Hal Cone, emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a premier academic voice in Black theology. Cone and Cleage’s collegiality is complicated. Yet, their works on Black theology and Black power complement each other when read in contrast. This essay looks intently at excerpts from Cleage’s sermons, “Brother Malcolm,” and “Dr. King and Black Power” and puts them in conversation with excerpts from Cone’s book “Martin and Malcolm in America.” This work shows the variance in perspectives and theological convictions, as well as the rhetorical strategies employed by Cleage and Cone to make their case for the most faithful engagement to Malcolm and Martin’s contributions to civil rights, Black power, and Black theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"263 - 287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14769948.2020.1833968\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2020.1833968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2020.1833968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与艾伯特·克利奇牧师同时代的詹姆斯·哈尔·科恩博士,在20世纪60年代末和70年代初作为黑人神学的主要学术声音出现。科恩和克利奇的同僚关系很复杂。然而,他们关于黑人神学和黑人权力的作品在对比阅读时是相辅相成的。这篇文章专注于克莱奇的布道节选,“马尔科姆兄弟”和“金博士与黑人权力”,并将它们与科恩的书“马丁和马尔科姆在美国”中的节选进行了对话。这部作品展示了观点和神学信念的差异,以及克莱奇和科恩所采用的修辞策略,以使他们的案例最忠实地参与马尔科姆和马丁对民权,黑人权力和黑人神学的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brother Malcolm, Dr. King, and Black Power – A Close and Complementary Reading
ABSTRACT Rev. Albert Cleage’s contemporary and counterpart, Dr. James Hal Cone, emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a premier academic voice in Black theology. Cone and Cleage’s collegiality is complicated. Yet, their works on Black theology and Black power complement each other when read in contrast. This essay looks intently at excerpts from Cleage’s sermons, “Brother Malcolm,” and “Dr. King and Black Power” and puts them in conversation with excerpts from Cone’s book “Martin and Malcolm in America.” This work shows the variance in perspectives and theological convictions, as well as the rhetorical strategies employed by Cleage and Cone to make their case for the most faithful engagement to Malcolm and Martin’s contributions to civil rights, Black power, and Black theology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BLACK THEOLOGY
BLACK THEOLOGY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信