结构多元性:19世纪孟加拉药房的地方、种姓、阶级和种族

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
P. Mukharji
{"title":"结构多元性:19世纪孟加拉药房的地方、种姓、阶级和种族","authors":"P. Mukharji","doi":"10.2307/40111559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Dispensaries in colonial South Asia have received scant attention in the historiography on colonial medicine in India. Those who have touched upon them have remarked on the pluralism and hybridity of the medicine practised in them. Yet these studies remain trapped within binarisms such as coloniser/colonised, science/tradition or Occident/Orient and fail to ask further questions about the structure of this medical pluralism. Why did colonial officials collaborate with some strains of indigenous healing while they rejected others outright? Asking this question also forces us to disaggregate categories such as 'indigenous medicine,' 'colonial medical establishment,' 'indigenous practitioners of western medicine' etc. I try to investigate here how categories such as locality, ethnicity and class structured the pluralism of the colonial dispensary practice.","PeriodicalId":29747,"journal":{"name":"Health and History","volume":"9 1","pages":"105 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40111559","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structuring Plurality: Locality, Caste, Class and Ethnicity in Nineteenth-Century Bengali Dispensaries\",\"authors\":\"P. Mukharji\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40111559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Dispensaries in colonial South Asia have received scant attention in the historiography on colonial medicine in India. Those who have touched upon them have remarked on the pluralism and hybridity of the medicine practised in them. Yet these studies remain trapped within binarisms such as coloniser/colonised, science/tradition or Occident/Orient and fail to ask further questions about the structure of this medical pluralism. Why did colonial officials collaborate with some strains of indigenous healing while they rejected others outright? Asking this question also forces us to disaggregate categories such as 'indigenous medicine,' 'colonial medical establishment,' 'indigenous practitioners of western medicine' etc. I try to investigate here how categories such as locality, ethnicity and class structured the pluralism of the colonial dispensary practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and History\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"105 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/40111559\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40111559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40111559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

摘要:殖民地南亚的药房在印度殖民地医学史上很少受到重视。那些接触过他们的人都评论了他们所从事的医学的多元化和混合性。然而,这些研究仍然被困在二元主义中,如殖民者/殖民者、科学/传统或西方/东方,未能对这种医学多元主义的结构提出进一步的问题。为什么殖民地官员与一些本土疗法合作,而他们却断然拒绝其他疗法?问这个问题也迫使我们分解诸如“本土医学”、“殖民地医疗机构”、“本土西医”等类别。我试图在这里调查地方、种族和阶级等类别是如何构建殖民地药房实践的多元化的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Structuring Plurality: Locality, Caste, Class and Ethnicity in Nineteenth-Century Bengali Dispensaries
Abstract:Dispensaries in colonial South Asia have received scant attention in the historiography on colonial medicine in India. Those who have touched upon them have remarked on the pluralism and hybridity of the medicine practised in them. Yet these studies remain trapped within binarisms such as coloniser/colonised, science/tradition or Occident/Orient and fail to ask further questions about the structure of this medical pluralism. Why did colonial officials collaborate with some strains of indigenous healing while they rejected others outright? Asking this question also forces us to disaggregate categories such as 'indigenous medicine,' 'colonial medical establishment,' 'indigenous practitioners of western medicine' etc. I try to investigate here how categories such as locality, ethnicity and class structured the pluralism of the colonial dispensary practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信