反思约翰1:1

IF 0.4 4区哲学 0 RELIGION

Novum Testamentum Pub Date : 2020-12-18 DOI:10.1163/15685365-12341691

Christopher S. Atkins

{"title":"反思约翰1:1","authors":"Christopher S. Atkins","doi":"10.1163/15685365-12341691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe presence of wisdom “with” God at or before creation is well attested in Jewish sapiential traditions. Given the widespread recognition that the logos of John’s prologue corresponds with sophia in such traditions, it has become natural to read John 1:1b as virtually all English translations do—that is, as “and the word was with God.” Through comparative analysis of the role of divine intermediary figures in Middle-Platonism and Philo of Alexandria, this article argues against the majority interpretation by providing new arguments and a new conceptual framework for the reading, “and the Word was Godward.”","PeriodicalId":19319,"journal":{"name":"Novum Testamentum","volume":"63 1","pages":"44-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking John 1:1\",\"authors\":\"Christopher S. Atkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685365-12341691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe presence of wisdom “with” God at or before creation is well attested in Jewish sapiential traditions. Given the widespread recognition that the logos of John’s prologue corresponds with sophia in such traditions, it has become natural to read John 1:1b as virtually all English translations do—that is, as “and the word was with God.” Through comparative analysis of the role of divine intermediary figures in Middle-Platonism and Philo of Alexandria, this article argues against the majority interpretation by providing new arguments and a new conceptual framework for the reading, “and the Word was Godward.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":19319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novum Testamentum\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"44-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novum Testamentum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341691\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novum Testamentum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-12341691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在犹太人的智慧传统中，智慧“与”上帝在创造时或创造之前的存在得到了很好的证明。鉴于人们普遍认为约翰福音序言中的逻各斯与这些传统中的索菲娅相对应，就很自然地把约翰福音1:10读成几乎所有英文译本的意思——也就是说，“道与神同在”。本文通过对中柏拉图主义和亚历山大的菲罗中神性中介人物角色的比较分析，为“道是神性的”这一解读提供了新的论据和新的概念框架，从而反驳了多数人的解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Rethinking John 1:1

The presence of wisdom “with” God at or before creation is well attested in Jewish sapiential traditions. Given the widespread recognition that the logos of John’s prologue corresponds with sophia in such traditions, it has become natural to read John 1:1b as virtually all English translations do—that is, as “and the word was with God.” Through comparative analysis of the role of divine intermediary figures in Middle-Platonism and Philo of Alexandria, this article argues against the majority interpretation by providing new arguments and a new conceptual framework for the reading, “and the Word was Godward.”

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Novum Testamentum RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Novum Testamentum is a leading international journal devoted to the study of the New Testament and related subjects. This includes text-critical, philological, and exegetical studies, and investigations which seek to situate early Christian texts (both canonical and non-canonical) and theology in the broader context of Jewish and Graeco-Roman history, culture, religion, and literature. ● For 50 years an unrivalled resource for the subject. ● Articles in English, French and German. ● Extensive Book Review section in each volume, introducing the reader to a large section of related titles.