工业数字化:来自澳大利亚和芬兰的比较分析

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
P. Leviäkangas, O. Kauppila
{"title":"工业数字化:来自澳大利亚和芬兰的比较分析","authors":"P. Leviäkangas, O. Kauppila","doi":"10.1504/ijtpm.2020.10026600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper features a two-country study on digitalisation: Australia and Finland. The empirical data was acquired from the national accounts for 1995-2015 in Australia and for 1998-2012 in Finland. This data was averaged for a cross-sectional comparison of industries and then for the two countries. Different industries' advancement in digitalisation seems to follow approximately the same pacing in both countries. Financial and insurance services, telecommunications and media, and professional, technical and scientific services are the most active digitalisers. The empirical testing of the a priori assumption that digitalisation over a long period of time leads to greater productivity shows that the observed correlation between information and communication technology (ICT) investment and productivity is weak. The results partly confirm Solow's productivity paradox.","PeriodicalId":55889,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitalisation of industries: a comparative analysis from Australia and Finland\",\"authors\":\"P. Leviäkangas, O. Kauppila\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijtpm.2020.10026600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper features a two-country study on digitalisation: Australia and Finland. The empirical data was acquired from the national accounts for 1995-2015 in Australia and for 1998-2012 in Finland. This data was averaged for a cross-sectional comparison of industries and then for the two countries. Different industries' advancement in digitalisation seems to follow approximately the same pacing in both countries. Financial and insurance services, telecommunications and media, and professional, technical and scientific services are the most active digitalisers. The empirical testing of the a priori assumption that digitalisation over a long period of time leads to greater productivity shows that the observed correlation between information and communication technology (ICT) investment and productivity is weak. The results partly confirm Solow's productivity paradox.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtpm.2020.10026600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtpm.2020.10026600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以澳大利亚和芬兰这两个国家的数字化研究为特色。经验数据来自澳大利亚1995-2015年和芬兰1998-2012年的国民账户。对这一数据进行了行业横截面比较的平均值,然后对这两个国家进行了比较。不同行业在数字化方面的进展在两国似乎大致相同。金融和保险服务、电信和媒体以及专业、技术和科学服务是最活跃的数字化者。对长期数字化可提高生产力这一先验假设的实证检验表明,信息和通信技术投资与生产力之间的相关性较弱。研究结果部分证实了索洛的生产率悖论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digitalisation of industries: a comparative analysis from Australia and Finland
This paper features a two-country study on digitalisation: Australia and Finland. The empirical data was acquired from the national accounts for 1995-2015 in Australia and for 1998-2012 in Finland. This data was averaged for a cross-sectional comparison of industries and then for the two countries. Different industries' advancement in digitalisation seems to follow approximately the same pacing in both countries. Financial and insurance services, telecommunications and media, and professional, technical and scientific services are the most active digitalisers. The empirical testing of the a priori assumption that digitalisation over a long period of time leads to greater productivity shows that the observed correlation between information and communication technology (ICT) investment and productivity is weak. The results partly confirm Solow's productivity paradox.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management
International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: IJTPM is a refereed international journal that provides a professional and scholarly forum in the emerging field of decision making and problem solving in the integrated area of technology policy and management at the operational, organisational and public policy levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信