“因为他们可以”:在皇家委员会调查银行、退休金和金融服务业不当行为之后,公司治理监管中的信任、诚信和目的

Q2 Social Sciences
J. O'Brien
{"title":"“因为他们可以”:在皇家委员会调查银行、退休金和金融服务业不当行为之后,公司治理监管中的信任、诚信和目的","authors":"J. O'Brien","doi":"10.1080/17521440.2019.1612616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an era of declining levels of public trust, royal commissions retain symbolic and actual power to provide potential reassurance. The handing down of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry in February 2019 marks a defining moment. It offers, for the first time, a coherent and cohesive normative framework that integrates law, morality and public expectations. In so doing, it invigorates debate on corporate purpose and duty to the society in which it operates. It also provides mechanisms to ensure more effective pathways towards binding sanction. The report, however, suffers from a significant flaw. It presents identified failures in governance in mechanistic terms as independent and episodic rather than a systemic question of sub-optimal culture. The behaviours in the sector reflect the wider inculcation of social norms within and beyond specific communities of practice. In so doing, the report undermines rather than strengthens the power of administrative agencies to guide industry as a whole towards socially beneficial outcomes. Change will only come from a broader exercise in deliberative governance in which cultural renewal is determined, endorsed, and lived.","PeriodicalId":43241,"journal":{"name":"Law and Financial Markets Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2019.1612616","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Because They Could”: trust, integrity, and purpose in the regulation of corporate governance in the aftermath of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry\",\"authors\":\"J. O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17521440.2019.1612616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an era of declining levels of public trust, royal commissions retain symbolic and actual power to provide potential reassurance. The handing down of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry in February 2019 marks a defining moment. It offers, for the first time, a coherent and cohesive normative framework that integrates law, morality and public expectations. In so doing, it invigorates debate on corporate purpose and duty to the society in which it operates. It also provides mechanisms to ensure more effective pathways towards binding sanction. The report, however, suffers from a significant flaw. It presents identified failures in governance in mechanistic terms as independent and episodic rather than a systemic question of sub-optimal culture. The behaviours in the sector reflect the wider inculcation of social norms within and beyond specific communities of practice. In so doing, the report undermines rather than strengthens the power of administrative agencies to guide industry as a whole towards socially beneficial outcomes. Change will only come from a broader exercise in deliberative governance in which cultural renewal is determined, endorsed, and lived.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Financial Markets Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17521440.2019.1612616\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Financial Markets Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2019.1612616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Financial Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2019.1612616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在公众信任水平下降的时代,皇家委员会保留了象征性和实际权力,以提供潜在的保证。2019年2月,英国皇家银行、养老金和金融服务业不当行为委员会的成立标志着一个决定性的时刻。它首次提供了一个连贯一致的规范框架,将法律、道德和公众期望相结合。通过这样做,它激发了关于公司宗旨和对其经营所在社会的责任的辩论。它还提供了确保实现具有约束力的制裁的更有效途径的机制。然而,该报告存在一个重大缺陷。它从机械的角度将治理中的失败描述为独立和偶发的,而不是次优文化的系统性问题。该部门的行为反映了在特定实践社区内外更广泛地灌输社会规范。在这样做的过程中,该报告削弱而不是加强了行政机构引导整个行业走向社会效益结果的权力。变革只会来自更广泛的审慎治理,在这种治理中,文化复兴是确定的、认可的和生活的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Because They Could”: trust, integrity, and purpose in the regulation of corporate governance in the aftermath of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry
In an era of declining levels of public trust, royal commissions retain symbolic and actual power to provide potential reassurance. The handing down of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry in February 2019 marks a defining moment. It offers, for the first time, a coherent and cohesive normative framework that integrates law, morality and public expectations. In so doing, it invigorates debate on corporate purpose and duty to the society in which it operates. It also provides mechanisms to ensure more effective pathways towards binding sanction. The report, however, suffers from a significant flaw. It presents identified failures in governance in mechanistic terms as independent and episodic rather than a systemic question of sub-optimal culture. The behaviours in the sector reflect the wider inculcation of social norms within and beyond specific communities of practice. In so doing, the report undermines rather than strengthens the power of administrative agencies to guide industry as a whole towards socially beneficial outcomes. Change will only come from a broader exercise in deliberative governance in which cultural renewal is determined, endorsed, and lived.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Law and Financial Markets Review is a new, independent, English language journal devoted to providing high quality information, comment and analysis for lawyers specialising in banking and financial market issues and to others with interests in legal and regulatory developments affecting the financial markets. Published four times a year LFMR contains articles written by leading experts providing a forum for practical guidance on, as well as reflective and topical analysis of, all major jurisdictions, with a particular focus on the interaction between the law and market practice and behaviour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信