山地城市学理论。作者:黄光裕

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andreas Haller
{"title":"山地城市学理论。作者:黄光裕","authors":"Andreas Haller","doi":"10.1659/mrd.mm264.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I started my scholarly journey toward a better understanding of urban development in mountains more than a decade ago, I noticed that (1) relatively little was then published on the relationship between cities and mountains and (2) a surprisingly large share of those publications was in Chinese. Therefore, I am happy to see one of the principal Chinese œuvres on mountain cities (Huang 2006) in English. The monograph Theory of Mountainurbanology is by Guangyu Huang (1935–2006), who was an eminent urban planner at Chongqing University. His book has a regional focus on China and aims to ‘‘emphasize the multi-discipline study on mountain cities, promote the ecological theory, and innovative thoughts on urban science research, in order to better direct mountain human settlement, balance human beings, and nature’’ (p vii). It also targets ‘‘planning and design professionals, decision-makers, college faculties, and students’’ (p xi). These intentions are shown by the 12 main chapters: ‘‘Introduction,’’ ‘‘Investigation,’’ ‘‘Site Selection,’’ ‘‘Typology,’’ ‘‘Planning,’’ ‘‘Design,’’ ‘‘Architecture,’’ ‘‘Transportation,’’ ‘‘Ecology,’’ ‘‘Disasters,’’ ‘‘Aesthetics,’’ and ‘‘Governance.’’ In chapter 1 (‘‘Introduction’’), the reader is introduced to basic definitions. ‘‘Mountains’’ are divided into different categories (mainly based on altitude), ranging from ‘‘hills’’ to ‘‘extremely high mountains.’’ Then the author briefly describes the character of ‘‘mountain cities,’’ rejecting simplistic visions that ignore the manifold relations between urban settlements (‘‘cities’’) and their surroundings (‘‘mountains’’). To underline the latter’s importance for urban construction, Huang lists several locational advantages and disadvantages of Chinese mountain cities. Chapter 1 continues with a definition of what the author calls mountainurbanology (why not mountain urbanology?): a holistic research approach to urban mountain settlements that explicitly includes the humanities (eg urban philosophy) and applied sciences such as engineering ecology as well as folk science (eg Chinese geomancy or [fēngshuı̌]). This attempt sounds intriguing, yet, at some point, I got confused by the comprehensiveness of the concept, and the redundant and inconsistent Table 3 might indicate that the author (or the translator) did not fully distinguish the spectrum of and relation between disciplines (eg montology is 1 of 3 pillars of mountainurbanology, and at the same time both montology and mountainurbanology appear again as elements of montology). The first part of the book concludes with thoughts on the complexity, diversity, vulnerability, and sensitivity of natural/artificial ‘‘mountainurban’’ ecosystems, integrating the concepts of landscape ecology and ecosystem services. The subsequent chapters 2 (‘‘Investigation’’) and 3 (‘‘Site Selection’’) focus on conditions to be understood and approaches to be applied to get a feel for a region and select appropriate sites to build cities in mountains. What is most probably new to many Western scholars is the Chinese geomantic approach to site selection, where the relation of cities to nearby mountains and rivers is crucial and even influences the building design (Hong Kong’s ‘‘dragon gates’’ are good examples). Chapter 3 concludes with a ‘‘case study’’ (1 paragraph) on the example of New Yunyang, where people were moved in the context of the Three Gorges project. I found these 2 chapters highly interesting and innovative. Chapter 4 provides a ‘‘Typology’’ of mountain cities in China, based on location (hilly, river valley, and ravine mountain cities) and function (‘‘resources developmentoriented mountain cities,’’ ‘‘regional transportation hub mountain cities,’’ ‘‘port mountain cities,’’ ‘‘memorial mountain cities,’’ ‘‘mountain cities of scenic tourism or religious worship,’’ and ‘‘comprehensive mountain cities’’). Although these types are properly illustrated with photos and maps, the typology lacks explanations on how (inductively or deductively?) it was developed. For example, it is not clear why port cities are not included in the transport hub category. Although such a listing of city types by location and function can heuristically make sense to structure the study object, in this case it conveys arbitrariness and remains rather superficial. From a geographer’s point of view, this chapter is not that convincing. Chapters 5 (‘‘Planning’’), 6 (‘‘Design’’), 7 (‘‘Architecture’’), and 8 (‘‘Transportation’’) are, perhaps, the core of this book. They start with principles of ‘‘mountainurban’’ planning, motivating the reader to engage with systems thinking, connecting nature and culture as well as space and time. What follows is a structural typology of mountain cities (that could have enriched chapter 4), with subsections on the specificities of planning and constructing in mountain watersheds, on the importance of open spaces, and on the use of the underground in mountain cities; the last subsection is inspiring and seems to be of uttermost importance. Then Huang highlights principles for designing mountain cities, for example, prioritizing ecology, adequately interacting with water, building on appropriate slopes, carefully selecting building heights, and protecting mountain tops or ridges against construction (for their recreation function). After a presentation of methodologies to correctly apply these principles, Huang underlines the importance of designing accessible urban environments, Mountain Research and Development (MRD) An international, peer-reviewed open access journal published by the International Mountain Society (IMS) www.mrd-journal.org MountainMedia","PeriodicalId":49793,"journal":{"name":"Mountain Research and Development","volume":"41 1","pages":"M2 - M3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theory of Mountainurbanology. By Guangyu Huang\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Haller\",\"doi\":\"10.1659/mrd.mm264.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When I started my scholarly journey toward a better understanding of urban development in mountains more than a decade ago, I noticed that (1) relatively little was then published on the relationship between cities and mountains and (2) a surprisingly large share of those publications was in Chinese. Therefore, I am happy to see one of the principal Chinese œuvres on mountain cities (Huang 2006) in English. The monograph Theory of Mountainurbanology is by Guangyu Huang (1935–2006), who was an eminent urban planner at Chongqing University. His book has a regional focus on China and aims to ‘‘emphasize the multi-discipline study on mountain cities, promote the ecological theory, and innovative thoughts on urban science research, in order to better direct mountain human settlement, balance human beings, and nature’’ (p vii). It also targets ‘‘planning and design professionals, decision-makers, college faculties, and students’’ (p xi). These intentions are shown by the 12 main chapters: ‘‘Introduction,’’ ‘‘Investigation,’’ ‘‘Site Selection,’’ ‘‘Typology,’’ ‘‘Planning,’’ ‘‘Design,’’ ‘‘Architecture,’’ ‘‘Transportation,’’ ‘‘Ecology,’’ ‘‘Disasters,’’ ‘‘Aesthetics,’’ and ‘‘Governance.’’ In chapter 1 (‘‘Introduction’’), the reader is introduced to basic definitions. ‘‘Mountains’’ are divided into different categories (mainly based on altitude), ranging from ‘‘hills’’ to ‘‘extremely high mountains.’’ Then the author briefly describes the character of ‘‘mountain cities,’’ rejecting simplistic visions that ignore the manifold relations between urban settlements (‘‘cities’’) and their surroundings (‘‘mountains’’). To underline the latter’s importance for urban construction, Huang lists several locational advantages and disadvantages of Chinese mountain cities. Chapter 1 continues with a definition of what the author calls mountainurbanology (why not mountain urbanology?): a holistic research approach to urban mountain settlements that explicitly includes the humanities (eg urban philosophy) and applied sciences such as engineering ecology as well as folk science (eg Chinese geomancy or [fēngshuı̌]). This attempt sounds intriguing, yet, at some point, I got confused by the comprehensiveness of the concept, and the redundant and inconsistent Table 3 might indicate that the author (or the translator) did not fully distinguish the spectrum of and relation between disciplines (eg montology is 1 of 3 pillars of mountainurbanology, and at the same time both montology and mountainurbanology appear again as elements of montology). The first part of the book concludes with thoughts on the complexity, diversity, vulnerability, and sensitivity of natural/artificial ‘‘mountainurban’’ ecosystems, integrating the concepts of landscape ecology and ecosystem services. The subsequent chapters 2 (‘‘Investigation’’) and 3 (‘‘Site Selection’’) focus on conditions to be understood and approaches to be applied to get a feel for a region and select appropriate sites to build cities in mountains. What is most probably new to many Western scholars is the Chinese geomantic approach to site selection, where the relation of cities to nearby mountains and rivers is crucial and even influences the building design (Hong Kong’s ‘‘dragon gates’’ are good examples). Chapter 3 concludes with a ‘‘case study’’ (1 paragraph) on the example of New Yunyang, where people were moved in the context of the Three Gorges project. I found these 2 chapters highly interesting and innovative. Chapter 4 provides a ‘‘Typology’’ of mountain cities in China, based on location (hilly, river valley, and ravine mountain cities) and function (‘‘resources developmentoriented mountain cities,’’ ‘‘regional transportation hub mountain cities,’’ ‘‘port mountain cities,’’ ‘‘memorial mountain cities,’’ ‘‘mountain cities of scenic tourism or religious worship,’’ and ‘‘comprehensive mountain cities’’). Although these types are properly illustrated with photos and maps, the typology lacks explanations on how (inductively or deductively?) it was developed. For example, it is not clear why port cities are not included in the transport hub category. Although such a listing of city types by location and function can heuristically make sense to structure the study object, in this case it conveys arbitrariness and remains rather superficial. From a geographer’s point of view, this chapter is not that convincing. Chapters 5 (‘‘Planning’’), 6 (‘‘Design’’), 7 (‘‘Architecture’’), and 8 (‘‘Transportation’’) are, perhaps, the core of this book. They start with principles of ‘‘mountainurban’’ planning, motivating the reader to engage with systems thinking, connecting nature and culture as well as space and time. What follows is a structural typology of mountain cities (that could have enriched chapter 4), with subsections on the specificities of planning and constructing in mountain watersheds, on the importance of open spaces, and on the use of the underground in mountain cities; the last subsection is inspiring and seems to be of uttermost importance. Then Huang highlights principles for designing mountain cities, for example, prioritizing ecology, adequately interacting with water, building on appropriate slopes, carefully selecting building heights, and protecting mountain tops or ridges against construction (for their recreation function). After a presentation of methodologies to correctly apply these principles, Huang underlines the importance of designing accessible urban environments, Mountain Research and Development (MRD) An international, peer-reviewed open access journal published by the International Mountain Society (IMS) www.mrd-journal.org MountainMedia\",\"PeriodicalId\":49793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mountain Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"M2 - M3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mountain Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.mm264.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountain Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.mm264.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

十多年前,当我开始我的学术之旅,更好地理解山区的城市发展时,我注意到(1)当时关于城市与山区关系的出版物相对较少,(2)这些出版物中有很大一部分是中文的。因此,我很高兴看到一本关于山城的主要中文专著(黄,2006)。重庆大学著名城市规划师黄光裕(1935–2006)的专著《山地城市学理论》。他的书以中国为区域焦点,旨在“强调山地城市的多学科研究,推广生态理论和城市科学研究的创新思想,以更好地指导山地人居,平衡人类与自然”(第七页)。它还针对“规划和设计专业人士、决策者、大学教师和学生”(p xi)。这些意图体现在12个主要章节中:“简介”、“调查”、“选址”、“类型学”、“规划”、“设计”、“建筑”、“运输”、“生态学”、“破坏者”、“美学”和“治理”在第一章(“引言”)中,向读者介绍了基本定义山脉分为不同的类别(主要根据海拔高度),从“山丘”到“极高的山脉”然后,作者简要描述了“山地城市”的特征,拒绝了忽视城市住区(“城市”)与其周围环境(“山脉”)之间的多重关系的简单化愿景。为了强调后者对城市建设的重要性,黄列举了中国山地城市的几个区位优势和劣势。第1章继续定义了作者所说的山地城市学(为什么不是山地城市学?):一种对城市山地定居点的整体研究方法,明确包括人文学科(如城市哲学)和应用科学,如工程生态学和民间科学(如中国风水学或[fıngshuı̌])。这个尝试听起来很有趣,但在某个时候,我被这个概念的全面性弄糊涂了,而多余且不一致的表3可能表明作者(或译者)没有完全区分学科的光谱和学科之间的关系(例如montology是山地城市学的三大支柱之一,同时montology和山地城市学都再次作为montology的元素出现)。本书的第一部分总结了自然/人工“山地”生态系统的复杂性、多样性、脆弱性和敏感性,融合了景观生态学和生态系统服务的概念。随后的第2章(“调查”)和第3章(“选址”)侧重于需要了解的条件和应用的方法,以了解一个地区并选择合适的山地城市选址。对于许多西方学者来说,最新的可能是中国的风水选址方法,城市与附近山川河流的关系至关重要,甚至会影响建筑设计(香港的“龙门”就是很好的例子)。第三章以“个案研究”(1段)结尾,以新云阳为例,在三峡工程的背景下,人们在这里迁移。我发现这两章非常有趣和创新。第四章介绍了中国山地城市的“类型学”,基于位置(丘陵、河谷和峡谷山城)和功能(“资源开发型山城”、“区域交通枢纽山城”和“港口山城”,“纪念性山城”或“风景旅游或宗教崇拜的山城”以及“综合山城”)。尽管这些类型用照片和地图进行了适当的说明,但类型学缺乏对其是如何(归纳或演绎?)发展的解释。例如,目前尚不清楚为什么港口城市没有被纳入交通枢纽类别。尽管按位置和功能列出城市类型可以启发性地构建研究对象,但在这种情况下,它传达了随意性,而且相当肤浅。从地理学家的角度来看,这一章并没有那么令人信服。第5章(“规划”)、第6章(“设计”)、7章(“建筑”)和第8章(“交通”)可能是本书的核心。它们从“蒙塔努班”规划的原则开始,激励读者参与系统思维,将自然和文化以及空间和时间联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theory of Mountainurbanology. By Guangyu Huang
When I started my scholarly journey toward a better understanding of urban development in mountains more than a decade ago, I noticed that (1) relatively little was then published on the relationship between cities and mountains and (2) a surprisingly large share of those publications was in Chinese. Therefore, I am happy to see one of the principal Chinese œuvres on mountain cities (Huang 2006) in English. The monograph Theory of Mountainurbanology is by Guangyu Huang (1935–2006), who was an eminent urban planner at Chongqing University. His book has a regional focus on China and aims to ‘‘emphasize the multi-discipline study on mountain cities, promote the ecological theory, and innovative thoughts on urban science research, in order to better direct mountain human settlement, balance human beings, and nature’’ (p vii). It also targets ‘‘planning and design professionals, decision-makers, college faculties, and students’’ (p xi). These intentions are shown by the 12 main chapters: ‘‘Introduction,’’ ‘‘Investigation,’’ ‘‘Site Selection,’’ ‘‘Typology,’’ ‘‘Planning,’’ ‘‘Design,’’ ‘‘Architecture,’’ ‘‘Transportation,’’ ‘‘Ecology,’’ ‘‘Disasters,’’ ‘‘Aesthetics,’’ and ‘‘Governance.’’ In chapter 1 (‘‘Introduction’’), the reader is introduced to basic definitions. ‘‘Mountains’’ are divided into different categories (mainly based on altitude), ranging from ‘‘hills’’ to ‘‘extremely high mountains.’’ Then the author briefly describes the character of ‘‘mountain cities,’’ rejecting simplistic visions that ignore the manifold relations between urban settlements (‘‘cities’’) and their surroundings (‘‘mountains’’). To underline the latter’s importance for urban construction, Huang lists several locational advantages and disadvantages of Chinese mountain cities. Chapter 1 continues with a definition of what the author calls mountainurbanology (why not mountain urbanology?): a holistic research approach to urban mountain settlements that explicitly includes the humanities (eg urban philosophy) and applied sciences such as engineering ecology as well as folk science (eg Chinese geomancy or [fēngshuı̌]). This attempt sounds intriguing, yet, at some point, I got confused by the comprehensiveness of the concept, and the redundant and inconsistent Table 3 might indicate that the author (or the translator) did not fully distinguish the spectrum of and relation between disciplines (eg montology is 1 of 3 pillars of mountainurbanology, and at the same time both montology and mountainurbanology appear again as elements of montology). The first part of the book concludes with thoughts on the complexity, diversity, vulnerability, and sensitivity of natural/artificial ‘‘mountainurban’’ ecosystems, integrating the concepts of landscape ecology and ecosystem services. The subsequent chapters 2 (‘‘Investigation’’) and 3 (‘‘Site Selection’’) focus on conditions to be understood and approaches to be applied to get a feel for a region and select appropriate sites to build cities in mountains. What is most probably new to many Western scholars is the Chinese geomantic approach to site selection, where the relation of cities to nearby mountains and rivers is crucial and even influences the building design (Hong Kong’s ‘‘dragon gates’’ are good examples). Chapter 3 concludes with a ‘‘case study’’ (1 paragraph) on the example of New Yunyang, where people were moved in the context of the Three Gorges project. I found these 2 chapters highly interesting and innovative. Chapter 4 provides a ‘‘Typology’’ of mountain cities in China, based on location (hilly, river valley, and ravine mountain cities) and function (‘‘resources developmentoriented mountain cities,’’ ‘‘regional transportation hub mountain cities,’’ ‘‘port mountain cities,’’ ‘‘memorial mountain cities,’’ ‘‘mountain cities of scenic tourism or religious worship,’’ and ‘‘comprehensive mountain cities’’). Although these types are properly illustrated with photos and maps, the typology lacks explanations on how (inductively or deductively?) it was developed. For example, it is not clear why port cities are not included in the transport hub category. Although such a listing of city types by location and function can heuristically make sense to structure the study object, in this case it conveys arbitrariness and remains rather superficial. From a geographer’s point of view, this chapter is not that convincing. Chapters 5 (‘‘Planning’’), 6 (‘‘Design’’), 7 (‘‘Architecture’’), and 8 (‘‘Transportation’’) are, perhaps, the core of this book. They start with principles of ‘‘mountainurban’’ planning, motivating the reader to engage with systems thinking, connecting nature and culture as well as space and time. What follows is a structural typology of mountain cities (that could have enriched chapter 4), with subsections on the specificities of planning and constructing in mountain watersheds, on the importance of open spaces, and on the use of the underground in mountain cities; the last subsection is inspiring and seems to be of uttermost importance. Then Huang highlights principles for designing mountain cities, for example, prioritizing ecology, adequately interacting with water, building on appropriate slopes, carefully selecting building heights, and protecting mountain tops or ridges against construction (for their recreation function). After a presentation of methodologies to correctly apply these principles, Huang underlines the importance of designing accessible urban environments, Mountain Research and Development (MRD) An international, peer-reviewed open access journal published by the International Mountain Society (IMS) www.mrd-journal.org MountainMedia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mountain Research and Development
Mountain Research and Development 地学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
18.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: MRD features three peer-reviewed sections: MountainDevelopment, which contains “Transformation Knowledge,” MountainResearch, which contains “Systems Knowledge,” and MountainAgenda, which contains “Target Knowledge.” In addition, the MountainPlatform section offers International Mountain Society members an opportunity to convey information about their mountain initiatives and priorities; and the MountainMedia section presents reviews of recent publications on mountains and mountain development. Key research and development fields: -Society and culture- Policy, politics, and institutions- Economy- Bio- and geophysical environment- Ecosystems and cycles- Environmental risks- Resource and land use- Energy, infrastructure, and services- Methods and theories- Regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信