用近似不动点理论分析聚合答案集规划的语义

IF 1.4 2区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Linde Vanbesien, M. Bruynooghe, M. Denecker
{"title":"用近似不动点理论分析聚合答案集规划的语义","authors":"Linde Vanbesien, M. Bruynooghe, M. Denecker","doi":"10.1017/S1471068422000126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aggregates provide a concise way to express complex knowledge. The problem of selecting an appropriate formalization of aggregates for answer set programming (ASP) remains unsettled. This paper revisits it from the viewpoint of Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT). We introduce an AFT formalization equivalent with the Gelfond–Lifschitz reduct for basic ASP programs and we extend it to handle aggregates. We analyze how existing approaches relate to our framework. We hope this work sheds some new light on the issue of a proper formalization of aggregates.","PeriodicalId":49436,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming","volume":"22 1","pages":"523 - 537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing Semantics of Aggregate Answer Set Programming Using Approximation Fixpoint Theory\",\"authors\":\"Linde Vanbesien, M. Bruynooghe, M. Denecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1471068422000126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Aggregates provide a concise way to express complex knowledge. The problem of selecting an appropriate formalization of aggregates for answer set programming (ASP) remains unsettled. This paper revisits it from the viewpoint of Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT). We introduce an AFT formalization equivalent with the Gelfond–Lifschitz reduct for basic ASP programs and we extend it to handle aggregates. We analyze how existing approaches relate to our framework. We hope this work sheds some new light on the issue of a proper formalization of aggregates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"523 - 537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068422000126\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Logic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1471068422000126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

抽象聚合为表达复杂的知识提供了一种简洁的方式。为答案集规划(ASP)选择合适的聚合形式的问题仍然没有解决。本文从近似不动点理论(AFT)的角度对其进行了重新审视。我们为基本ASP程序引入了与gelfund - lifschitz约简等价的AFT形式化,并将其扩展到处理聚合。我们分析现有方法如何与我们的框架相关联。我们希望这项工作能对聚合的适当形式化问题提供一些新的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing Semantics of Aggregate Answer Set Programming Using Approximation Fixpoint Theory
Abstract Aggregates provide a concise way to express complex knowledge. The problem of selecting an appropriate formalization of aggregates for answer set programming (ASP) remains unsettled. This paper revisits it from the viewpoint of Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT). We introduce an AFT formalization equivalent with the Gelfond–Lifschitz reduct for basic ASP programs and we extend it to handle aggregates. We analyze how existing approaches relate to our framework. We hope this work sheds some new light on the issue of a proper formalization of aggregates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming emphasises both the theory and practice of logic programming. Logic programming applies to all areas of artificial intelligence and computer science and is fundamental to them. Among the topics covered are AI applications that use logic programming, logic programming methodologies, specification, analysis and verification of systems, inductive logic programming, multi-relational data mining, natural language processing, knowledge representation, non-monotonic reasoning, semantic web reasoning, databases, implementations and architectures and constraint logic programming.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信