一种模块化应用的新型飞行控制器设计

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
M. Say, Alvin Chua, E. Sybingco, M. A. Roque, L. Ambata, John A. Tan, Clarisse Crespo, R. Rivera, Jayson Piquero
{"title":"一种模块化应用的新型飞行控制器设计","authors":"M. Say, Alvin Chua, E. Sybingco, M. A. Roque, L. Ambata, John A. Tan, Clarisse Crespo, R. Rivera, Jayson Piquero","doi":"10.11113/aej.v12.17561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A local flight controller was developed for modular applications based on the Pixhawk 1 flight controller with modifications to accommodate companion computer provision for future integration. This design is made for future modular applications, but for now, the functionality and performance of the local flight controller were tested and compared to the Pixhawk flight controller. A simple 3D printed enclosure was made to house the local flight controller for easier mounting on UAV frames. To compare the performance of the developed controller, two setups were made:  local flight controller and Pixhawk 1 on separate quadcopter frames, and local flight controller and Pixhawk Cube on separate fixed-wing frames. The flight controllers made use of the Ardupilot firmware, specifically ArduCopter and ArduPlane in conducting the flight tests. Auto flight mode was used to have autonomous flights which were then used to compare the flight data between test setups. The desired position and actual position were compared for each flight controller, and their differences with the other flight controllers were compared to see the variation between the different controllers used. After analyzing the data, the local flight controller developed was proven able to produce comparable results with the Pixhawk flight controllers. The percent difference between the mean values of the Pixhawk 1 and the local flight controller were 3.7064% and 8.6128% using the quadcopter frame for Position X and Y, respectively, while for the Pixhawk Cube and the local flight controller, the values were 12.6866% and 1.1045% using the fixed-wing frame, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36749,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A NOVEL FLIGHT CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR MODULAR APPLICATIONS\",\"authors\":\"M. Say, Alvin Chua, E. Sybingco, M. A. Roque, L. Ambata, John A. Tan, Clarisse Crespo, R. Rivera, Jayson Piquero\",\"doi\":\"10.11113/aej.v12.17561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A local flight controller was developed for modular applications based on the Pixhawk 1 flight controller with modifications to accommodate companion computer provision for future integration. This design is made for future modular applications, but for now, the functionality and performance of the local flight controller were tested and compared to the Pixhawk flight controller. A simple 3D printed enclosure was made to house the local flight controller for easier mounting on UAV frames. To compare the performance of the developed controller, two setups were made:  local flight controller and Pixhawk 1 on separate quadcopter frames, and local flight controller and Pixhawk Cube on separate fixed-wing frames. The flight controllers made use of the Ardupilot firmware, specifically ArduCopter and ArduPlane in conducting the flight tests. Auto flight mode was used to have autonomous flights which were then used to compare the flight data between test setups. The desired position and actual position were compared for each flight controller, and their differences with the other flight controllers were compared to see the variation between the different controllers used. After analyzing the data, the local flight controller developed was proven able to produce comparable results with the Pixhawk flight controllers. The percent difference between the mean values of the Pixhawk 1 and the local flight controller were 3.7064% and 8.6128% using the quadcopter frame for Position X and Y, respectively, while for the Pixhawk Cube and the local flight controller, the values were 12.6866% and 1.1045% using the fixed-wing frame, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASEAN Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASEAN Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v12.17561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v12.17561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Pixhawk 1飞行控制器的基础上,为模块化应用开发了一种本地飞行控制器,并对其进行了修改,以适应未来集成的配套计算机。这种设计是为未来的模块化应用而设计的,但目前,本地飞行控制器的功能和性能已经过测试,并与Pixhawk飞行控制器进行了比较。制作了一个简单的3D打印外壳来容纳本地飞行控制器,以便更容易地安装在无人机框架上。为了比较所开发的控制器的性能,进行了两种设置:本地飞行控制器和Pixhawk 1在单独的四旋翼机框架上,本地飞行控制器与PixhawkCube在单独的固定翼框架上。飞行控制器在进行飞行测试时使用了Arduplot固件,特别是ArduCopter和ArduPlane。自动飞行模式用于自主飞行,然后用于比较测试装置之间的飞行数据。比较每个飞行控制器的期望位置和实际位置,并比较它们与其他飞行控制器的差异,以查看所使用的不同控制器之间的变化。在分析数据后,开发的本地飞行控制器被证明能够产生与Pixhawk飞行控制器可比较的结果。对于位置X和Y,使用四旋翼机框架的Pixhawk 1和本地飞行控制器的平均值之间的百分比差异分别为3.7064%和8.6128%,而对于PixhawkCube和本地飞行控制,使用固定翼框架的值分别为12.6866%和1.1045%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A NOVEL FLIGHT CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR MODULAR APPLICATIONS
A local flight controller was developed for modular applications based on the Pixhawk 1 flight controller with modifications to accommodate companion computer provision for future integration. This design is made for future modular applications, but for now, the functionality and performance of the local flight controller were tested and compared to the Pixhawk flight controller. A simple 3D printed enclosure was made to house the local flight controller for easier mounting on UAV frames. To compare the performance of the developed controller, two setups were made:  local flight controller and Pixhawk 1 on separate quadcopter frames, and local flight controller and Pixhawk Cube on separate fixed-wing frames. The flight controllers made use of the Ardupilot firmware, specifically ArduCopter and ArduPlane in conducting the flight tests. Auto flight mode was used to have autonomous flights which were then used to compare the flight data between test setups. The desired position and actual position were compared for each flight controller, and their differences with the other flight controllers were compared to see the variation between the different controllers used. After analyzing the data, the local flight controller developed was proven able to produce comparable results with the Pixhawk flight controllers. The percent difference between the mean values of the Pixhawk 1 and the local flight controller were 3.7064% and 8.6128% using the quadcopter frame for Position X and Y, respectively, while for the Pixhawk Cube and the local flight controller, the values were 12.6866% and 1.1045% using the fixed-wing frame, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASEAN Engineering Journal
ASEAN Engineering Journal Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信