残奥会阴影下的政策变化:日本残疾人运动与无障碍改革

IF 0.4 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Celeste L. Arrington, Mark R. Bookman
{"title":"残奥会阴影下的政策变化:日本残疾人运动与无障碍改革","authors":"Celeste L. Arrington, Mark R. Bookman","doi":"10.1080/10371397.2023.2178884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games provided Japanese stakeholders opportunities to pressure policymakers to pass reforms, including measures to improve accessibility. However, the Games alone are not sufficient to explain the scope and consequences of recent accessibility reforms. We argue that researchers must also consider the impact of historical contingencies such as decades of activism for accessibility by affected parties (tōjisha), the 3/11 ‘triple disaster,’ and Japan’s 2014 ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to understand how disabled persons’ organizations were able to leverage the Games to influence reforms. Drawing on government records, news media reports, and documents from disability advocacy organizations, we unpack several causal mechanisms that linked activism for accessibility to policy changes and thereby contribute to studies of minority social movements and policymaking in Japan. Our analysis of accessibility initiatives documents a ‘legalistic turn’ in Japanese governance, characterized by more formal rules and enforcement mechanisms. While the implementation of those initiatives was hampered by scarcity of human and material resources as well as the spread of COVID-19, they nevertheless improved accessibility for many individuals and encouraged conversations about equity and inclusion that persist into the present.","PeriodicalId":44839,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Studies","volume":"43 1","pages":"27 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy Change in the Shadow of the Paralympics: Disability Activism and Accessibility Reforms in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Celeste L. Arrington, Mark R. Bookman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10371397.2023.2178884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games provided Japanese stakeholders opportunities to pressure policymakers to pass reforms, including measures to improve accessibility. However, the Games alone are not sufficient to explain the scope and consequences of recent accessibility reforms. We argue that researchers must also consider the impact of historical contingencies such as decades of activism for accessibility by affected parties (tōjisha), the 3/11 ‘triple disaster,’ and Japan’s 2014 ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to understand how disabled persons’ organizations were able to leverage the Games to influence reforms. Drawing on government records, news media reports, and documents from disability advocacy organizations, we unpack several causal mechanisms that linked activism for accessibility to policy changes and thereby contribute to studies of minority social movements and policymaking in Japan. Our analysis of accessibility initiatives documents a ‘legalistic turn’ in Japanese governance, characterized by more formal rules and enforcement mechanisms. While the implementation of those initiatives was hampered by scarcity of human and material resources as well as the spread of COVID-19, they nevertheless improved accessibility for many individuals and encouraged conversations about equity and inclusion that persist into the present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Studies\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1090\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2023.2178884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2023.2178884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年东京奥运会和残奥会为日本利益相关者提供了向政策制定者施压的机会,要求他们通过改革措施,包括改善无障碍环境的措施。然而,游戏本身并不足以解释最近无障碍改革的范围和后果。我们认为,研究人员还必须考虑历史偶发事件的影响,如受影响各方数十年的无障碍行动主义(tōjisha), 3/11“三重灾难”,以及日本2014年批准的《联合国残疾人权利公约》,以了解残疾人组织如何能够利用奥运会影响改革。根据政府记录、新闻媒体报道和残疾人倡导组织的文件,我们揭示了将无障碍行动主义与政策变化联系起来的几个因果机制,从而有助于研究日本的少数民族社会运动和政策制定。我们对无障碍举措的分析记录了日本治理的“法制化转变”,其特点是更正式的规则和执行机制。尽管这些举措的实施受到人力和物质资源短缺以及2019冠状病毒病蔓延的阻碍,但它们改善了许多人的可及性,并鼓励了有关公平和包容的对话,这种对话一直持续到今天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy Change in the Shadow of the Paralympics: Disability Activism and Accessibility Reforms in Japan
Abstract The Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games provided Japanese stakeholders opportunities to pressure policymakers to pass reforms, including measures to improve accessibility. However, the Games alone are not sufficient to explain the scope and consequences of recent accessibility reforms. We argue that researchers must also consider the impact of historical contingencies such as decades of activism for accessibility by affected parties (tōjisha), the 3/11 ‘triple disaster,’ and Japan’s 2014 ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to understand how disabled persons’ organizations were able to leverage the Games to influence reforms. Drawing on government records, news media reports, and documents from disability advocacy organizations, we unpack several causal mechanisms that linked activism for accessibility to policy changes and thereby contribute to studies of minority social movements and policymaking in Japan. Our analysis of accessibility initiatives documents a ‘legalistic turn’ in Japanese governance, characterized by more formal rules and enforcement mechanisms. While the implementation of those initiatives was hampered by scarcity of human and material resources as well as the spread of COVID-19, they nevertheless improved accessibility for many individuals and encouraged conversations about equity and inclusion that persist into the present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Studies
Japanese Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信