测量学生在以病人为中心的会诊中识别核心要素的能力,使用一种新工具,包括问卷调查和全科医生的视频会诊。学习过程的指导。

Merete Jorgensen, H. Thorsen, V. Siersma, C. Bang
{"title":"测量学生在以病人为中心的会诊中识别核心要素的能力,使用一种新工具,包括问卷调查和全科医生的视频会诊。学习过程的指导。","authors":"Merete Jorgensen, H. Thorsen, V. Siersma, C. Bang","doi":"10.12688/mep.19332.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Diverse ways to measure course effectiveness in medical education exist, but it takes time to have the results. The authors have developed a tool consisting of a questionnaire (DanOBS) combined with a test video consultation. The students watched a consultation video and completed a questionnaire about patient-centered elements before and after the course. This study aimed to evaluate the learning process for teachers and students with the DanOBS and a consultation video. Method: Altogether 201 students from autumn 2019 were included in this study, assigned by the university to three general practice courses and six small study groups. After introducing the patient-centered consultation model on the first day of the course, the students watched a video consultation and completed the DanOBS online on their Mobile Phones. They watched the video and completed the questionnaire again on one of the last days of the course. The number of correct answers in each item was compared before and after the course. Furthermore, effect sizes for each item were calculated. Results: The number of students completing the questionnaire before and after the course was 161. The number of correct answers increased after the course. Items where the teaching was a success, as well as items where it needs intensifying, were identified. The DanOBS instrument reflected the effect of strengthening the learning in some elements of the patient-centered mode. Conclusion: A tool for measuring efficacy in teaching patient-centered consultation has been implemented and has given valuable information to teachers about where the students need intensified teaching. The tool can measure the effectiveness of various educational interventions.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring students’ ability to identify core elements in a patient-centered consultation with a new tool comprising a questionnaire and a video consultation from general practice. Guidance for the learning process.\",\"authors\":\"Merete Jorgensen, H. Thorsen, V. Siersma, C. Bang\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.19332.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Diverse ways to measure course effectiveness in medical education exist, but it takes time to have the results. The authors have developed a tool consisting of a questionnaire (DanOBS) combined with a test video consultation. The students watched a consultation video and completed a questionnaire about patient-centered elements before and after the course. This study aimed to evaluate the learning process for teachers and students with the DanOBS and a consultation video. Method: Altogether 201 students from autumn 2019 were included in this study, assigned by the university to three general practice courses and six small study groups. After introducing the patient-centered consultation model on the first day of the course, the students watched a video consultation and completed the DanOBS online on their Mobile Phones. They watched the video and completed the questionnaire again on one of the last days of the course. The number of correct answers in each item was compared before and after the course. Furthermore, effect sizes for each item were calculated. Results: The number of students completing the questionnaire before and after the course was 161. The number of correct answers increased after the course. Items where the teaching was a success, as well as items where it needs intensifying, were identified. The DanOBS instrument reflected the effect of strengthening the learning in some elements of the patient-centered mode. Conclusion: A tool for measuring efficacy in teaching patient-centered consultation has been implemented and has given valuable information to teachers about where the students need intensified teaching. The tool can measure the effectiveness of various educational interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19332.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19332.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:医学教育课程有效性的评估方法多种多样,但需要一定的时间才能取得成效。作者开发了一种工具,由问卷调查(DanOBS)和测试视频咨询相结合。学生们在课程前后观看了一段咨询视频,并完成了一份关于以患者为中心因素的问卷调查。本研究旨在通过DanOBS和咨询视频来评估教师和学生的学习过程。方法:2019年秋季入学的201名学生被纳入本研究,由学校分配参加三门全科医学课程和六个小组学习。在课程第一天介绍了以患者为中心的咨询模式后,学生们观看了视频咨询,并通过手机在线完成了DanOBS。他们观看了视频,并在课程的最后一天再次完成了问卷调查。在课程前后比较每个项目的正确答案的数量。此外,计算了每个项目的效应量。结果:课程前后完成问卷的学生人数为161人。课程结束后,正确答案的数量增加了。确定了教学取得成功的项目,以及需要加强的项目。DanOBS仪器在以患者为中心模式的某些要素中反映了强化学习的效果。结论:建立了以患者为中心的咨询教学效果测评工具,为教师提供了学生需要加强教学的有价值的信息。该工具可以衡量各种教育干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring students’ ability to identify core elements in a patient-centered consultation with a new tool comprising a questionnaire and a video consultation from general practice. Guidance for the learning process.
Introduction: Diverse ways to measure course effectiveness in medical education exist, but it takes time to have the results. The authors have developed a tool consisting of a questionnaire (DanOBS) combined with a test video consultation. The students watched a consultation video and completed a questionnaire about patient-centered elements before and after the course. This study aimed to evaluate the learning process for teachers and students with the DanOBS and a consultation video. Method: Altogether 201 students from autumn 2019 were included in this study, assigned by the university to three general practice courses and six small study groups. After introducing the patient-centered consultation model on the first day of the course, the students watched a video consultation and completed the DanOBS online on their Mobile Phones. They watched the video and completed the questionnaire again on one of the last days of the course. The number of correct answers in each item was compared before and after the course. Furthermore, effect sizes for each item were calculated. Results: The number of students completing the questionnaire before and after the course was 161. The number of correct answers increased after the course. Items where the teaching was a success, as well as items where it needs intensifying, were identified. The DanOBS instrument reflected the effect of strengthening the learning in some elements of the patient-centered mode. Conclusion: A tool for measuring efficacy in teaching patient-centered consultation has been implemented and has given valuable information to teachers about where the students need intensified teaching. The tool can measure the effectiveness of various educational interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信