基于模拟的生态位模型和物种分布模型标定区选择方法

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Fernando Machado-Stredel, M. Cobos, A. Peterson
{"title":"基于模拟的生态位模型和物种分布模型标定区选择方法","authors":"Fernando Machado-Stredel, M. Cobos, A. Peterson","doi":"10.21425/f5fbg48814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ecological niche models and species distribution models (ENM and SDM, respectively) are tools that have seen massive use and considerable improvement during the last twenty years. The choice of calibration areas for such models has strong effects on model outcomes and model interpretation, as well as on model transfer to distinct environmental settings. However, approaches to selecting these areas remain simple and/or unlinked to biological concepts. Such models should be calibrated within areas that the species of interest has explored throughout its recent history, the accessible area (M). In this paper, we provide a simulation approach for estimating a species’ M considering processes of dispersal, colonization, and extinction in constant current climate or glacial-interglacial climate change frameworks, implemented within a new R package we developed called grinnell. Using the avian genus Aphelocoma, we explored different parameterizations of our simulation, and compared them to current approaches for M selection, in terms of model performance and risk of extrapolation using the algorithm Maxent and mobility-oriented parity analyses. Model calibration exercises from all approaches resulted in at least one model meeting optimal performance criteria for each species; however, we noted high variability among taxa and M selection methods. More importantly, M hypotheses derived directly from simulations of key biological processes, rather than being based on simple proxies of those processes, and as such are better suited to erecting biologically appropriate contrasts in model calibration, and to characterizing the potential for model extrapolation more rigorously. Major factors in our simulations were environmental layer resolution, dispersal kernel characteristics, and the inclusion of a changing framework of climatic conditions. This contribution represents the first simulation-based method for selecting calibration areas for ENM and SDM, offering a quantitative approach to estimate the accessible area of a species while considering its dispersal ability, along with patterns of change in environmental suitability across space and time.","PeriodicalId":37788,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Biogeography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A simulation-based method for selecting calibration areas for ecological niche models and species distribution models\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Machado-Stredel, M. Cobos, A. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.21425/f5fbg48814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ecological niche models and species distribution models (ENM and SDM, respectively) are tools that have seen massive use and considerable improvement during the last twenty years. The choice of calibration areas for such models has strong effects on model outcomes and model interpretation, as well as on model transfer to distinct environmental settings. However, approaches to selecting these areas remain simple and/or unlinked to biological concepts. Such models should be calibrated within areas that the species of interest has explored throughout its recent history, the accessible area (M). In this paper, we provide a simulation approach for estimating a species’ M considering processes of dispersal, colonization, and extinction in constant current climate or glacial-interglacial climate change frameworks, implemented within a new R package we developed called grinnell. Using the avian genus Aphelocoma, we explored different parameterizations of our simulation, and compared them to current approaches for M selection, in terms of model performance and risk of extrapolation using the algorithm Maxent and mobility-oriented parity analyses. Model calibration exercises from all approaches resulted in at least one model meeting optimal performance criteria for each species; however, we noted high variability among taxa and M selection methods. More importantly, M hypotheses derived directly from simulations of key biological processes, rather than being based on simple proxies of those processes, and as such are better suited to erecting biologically appropriate contrasts in model calibration, and to characterizing the potential for model extrapolation more rigorously. Major factors in our simulations were environmental layer resolution, dispersal kernel characteristics, and the inclusion of a changing framework of climatic conditions. This contribution represents the first simulation-based method for selecting calibration areas for ENM and SDM, offering a quantitative approach to estimate the accessible area of a species while considering its dispersal ability, along with patterns of change in environmental suitability across space and time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Biogeography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Biogeography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21425/f5fbg48814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21425/f5fbg48814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

生态位模型和物种分布模型(分别为ENM和SDM)是在过去二十年中得到大量使用和显著改进的工具。这种模型的校准区域的选择对模型结果和模型解释以及模型向不同环境环境的转移都有很大影响。然而,选择这些领域的方法仍然很简单和/或与生物学概念没有联系。此类模型应在感兴趣物种在其近代史上探索过的区域内进行校准,即可达区域(M)。在本文中,我们提供了一种模拟方法来估计一个物种的M,考虑到在恒定流气候或冰川间冰川气候变化框架中的扩散、殖民化和灭绝过程,该方法在我们开发的一个名为grinell的新R包中实施。使用Aphelocoma属鸟类,我们探索了模拟的不同参数化,并将其与当前的M选择方法进行了比较,在模型性能和使用Maxent算法和面向移动性的奇偶性分析进行外推的风险方面。所有方法的模型校准练习导致至少一个模型符合每个物种的最佳性能标准;然而,我们注意到分类群和M选择方法之间的高度可变性。更重要的是,M个假设直接来源于关键生物过程的模拟,而不是基于这些过程的简单代理,因此更适合在模型校准中建立生物学上合适的对比,并更严格地表征模型外推的潜力。我们模拟中的主要因素是环境层分辨率、扩散核特征以及气候条件变化框架的包含。这一贡献代表了第一种基于模拟的方法来选择ENM和SDM的校准区域,提供了一种定量方法来估计物种的可到达区域,同时考虑其扩散能力,以及环境适宜性在空间和时间上的变化模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A simulation-based method for selecting calibration areas for ecological niche models and species distribution models
Ecological niche models and species distribution models (ENM and SDM, respectively) are tools that have seen massive use and considerable improvement during the last twenty years. The choice of calibration areas for such models has strong effects on model outcomes and model interpretation, as well as on model transfer to distinct environmental settings. However, approaches to selecting these areas remain simple and/or unlinked to biological concepts. Such models should be calibrated within areas that the species of interest has explored throughout its recent history, the accessible area (M). In this paper, we provide a simulation approach for estimating a species’ M considering processes of dispersal, colonization, and extinction in constant current climate or glacial-interglacial climate change frameworks, implemented within a new R package we developed called grinnell. Using the avian genus Aphelocoma, we explored different parameterizations of our simulation, and compared them to current approaches for M selection, in terms of model performance and risk of extrapolation using the algorithm Maxent and mobility-oriented parity analyses. Model calibration exercises from all approaches resulted in at least one model meeting optimal performance criteria for each species; however, we noted high variability among taxa and M selection methods. More importantly, M hypotheses derived directly from simulations of key biological processes, rather than being based on simple proxies of those processes, and as such are better suited to erecting biologically appropriate contrasts in model calibration, and to characterizing the potential for model extrapolation more rigorously. Major factors in our simulations were environmental layer resolution, dispersal kernel characteristics, and the inclusion of a changing framework of climatic conditions. This contribution represents the first simulation-based method for selecting calibration areas for ENM and SDM, offering a quantitative approach to estimate the accessible area of a species while considering its dispersal ability, along with patterns of change in environmental suitability across space and time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Biogeography
Frontiers of Biogeography Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Biogeography is the scientific magazine of the International Biogeography Society (http://www.biogeography.org/). Our scope includes news, original research letters, reviews, opinions and perspectives, news, commentaries, interviews, and articles on how to teach, disseminate and/or apply biogeographical knowledge. We accept papers on the study of the geographical variations of life at all levels of organization, including also studies on temporal and/or evolutionary variations in any component of biodiversity if they have a geographical perspective, as well as studies at relatively small scales if they have a spatially explicit component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信