澳大利亚偏远地区的工作和幸福:超越惩罚性的“工作福利”

IF 1.4 2区社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY

Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2022-07-25 DOI:10.1177/14407833221114669

Zoe Staines

{"title":"澳大利亚偏远地区的工作和幸福:超越惩罚性的“工作福利”","authors":"Zoe Staines","doi":"10.1177/14407833221114669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia's remote-focused ‘workfare’ program (Community Development Program, CDP) has produced overwhelmingly negative impacts, most of which have been borne by its ∼80% Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants. The Australian government has announced that CDP will end in 2023, though a replacement policy/program is not yet decided. Here, I bring three public proposals for replacement policies (wage subsidy, Job Guarantee, Liveable Income Guarantee) into conversation with one another, and compare these to the possibilities offered by a basic income. Drawing on documentary evidence, I discuss potential advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives, asking whether they might improve wellbeing and alleviate the harms experienced under CDP-style workfare.","PeriodicalId":47556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work and wellbeing in remote Australia: Moving beyond punitive ‘workfare’\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Staines\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14407833221114669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Australia's remote-focused ‘workfare’ program (Community Development Program, CDP) has produced overwhelmingly negative impacts, most of which have been borne by its ∼80% Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants. The Australian government has announced that CDP will end in 2023, though a replacement policy/program is not yet decided. Here, I bring three public proposals for replacement policies (wage subsidy, Job Guarantee, Liveable Income Guarantee) into conversation with one another, and compare these to the possibilities offered by a basic income. Drawing on documentary evidence, I discuss potential advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives, asking whether they might improve wellbeing and alleviate the harms experienced under CDP-style workfare.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833221114669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14407833221114669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚以远程为重点的“工作福利”计划（社区发展计划，CDP）产生了压倒性的负面影响，其中大部分由其约80%的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民参与者承担。澳大利亚政府已宣布CDP将于2023年结束，但替代政策/计划尚未决定。在这里，我带来了三个关于替代政策的公开建议（工资补贴、工作保障、生活收入保障），并将其与基本收入提供的可能性进行了比较。根据文献证据，我讨论了这些替代方案的潜在优势和劣势，询问它们是否可以改善健康状况，减轻CDP式工作福利带来的危害。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Work and wellbeing in remote Australia: Moving beyond punitive ‘workfare’

Australia's remote-focused ‘workfare’ program (Community Development Program, CDP) has produced overwhelmingly negative impacts, most of which have been borne by its ∼80% Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants. The Australian government has announced that CDP will end in 2023, though a replacement policy/program is not yet decided. Here, I bring three public proposals for replacement policies (wage subsidy, Job Guarantee, Liveable Income Guarantee) into conversation with one another, and compare these to the possibilities offered by a basic income. Drawing on documentary evidence, I discuss potential advantages and disadvantages of these alternatives, asking whether they might improve wellbeing and alleviate the harms experienced under CDP-style workfare.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Sociology SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Sociology is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences.