学生主导的可持续发展教育课程合作规划面临的挑战和紧张关系

Jaana Herranen, Sakari Tolppanen, Veli-Matti Vesterinen, M. Aksela
{"title":"学生主导的可持续发展教育课程合作规划面临的挑战和紧张关系","authors":"Jaana Herranen, Sakari Tolppanen, Veli-Matti Vesterinen, M. Aksela","doi":"10.5617/nordina.6583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractStudent-led courses have been described as a promising approach to improve sustainability education. However, there is a lack of systematic studies about the benefits and challenges of such courses. This qualitative case study examines the challenges and tensions that arose in the planning of a student-led higher education course on sustainability education. The challenges were identified from the student course designers’ conversations and interviews using discourse analysis, focusing on their disagreements during planning. The identified challenges concerned sustainability and sustainability education, the course designers’ roles, and collaborative decision-making. To relate the challenges to wider discourses on these topics, five underlying tensions were recognized. These include the tension between participatory action and critical discussion approaches for sustainability education, and the tension between drive towards unanimity and agreeing to disagree in collaborative educational planning. Finally, it is discussed how, and to what degree, the challenges and tensions can and should be mitigated.","PeriodicalId":37114,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"18-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and tensions in collaborative planning of a student-led course on sustainability education\",\"authors\":\"Jaana Herranen, Sakari Tolppanen, Veli-Matti Vesterinen, M. Aksela\",\"doi\":\"10.5617/nordina.6583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractStudent-led courses have been described as a promising approach to improve sustainability education. However, there is a lack of systematic studies about the benefits and challenges of such courses. This qualitative case study examines the challenges and tensions that arose in the planning of a student-led higher education course on sustainability education. The challenges were identified from the student course designers’ conversations and interviews using discourse analysis, focusing on their disagreements during planning. The identified challenges concerned sustainability and sustainability education, the course designers’ roles, and collaborative decision-making. To relate the challenges to wider discourses on these topics, five underlying tensions were recognized. These include the tension between participatory action and critical discussion approaches for sustainability education, and the tension between drive towards unanimity and agreeing to disagree in collaborative educational planning. Finally, it is discussed how, and to what degree, the challenges and tensions can and should be mitigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Studies in Science Education\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"18-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Studies in Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.6583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.6583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要以学生为主导的课程已被描述为改善可持续教育的一种有前途的方法。然而,关于此类课程的好处和挑战,缺乏系统的研究。这个定性案例研究考察了在学生主导的可持续教育高等教育课程规划中出现的挑战和紧张关系。挑战是从学生课程设计师的对话和访谈中识别出来的,使用话语分析,重点关注他们在规划过程中的分歧。所确定的挑战涉及可持续性和可持续性教育,课程设计师的角色和协作决策。为了将这些挑战与有关这些主题的更广泛的话语联系起来,认识到五个潜在的紧张关系。其中包括可持续性教育的参与性行动和批判性讨论方法之间的紧张关系,以及协作教育规划中追求一致和同意不同意之间的紧张关系。最后,讨论了如何以及在何种程度上能够和应该缓解挑战和紧张局势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges and tensions in collaborative planning of a student-led course on sustainability education
AbstractStudent-led courses have been described as a promising approach to improve sustainability education. However, there is a lack of systematic studies about the benefits and challenges of such courses. This qualitative case study examines the challenges and tensions that arose in the planning of a student-led higher education course on sustainability education. The challenges were identified from the student course designers’ conversations and interviews using discourse analysis, focusing on their disagreements during planning. The identified challenges concerned sustainability and sustainability education, the course designers’ roles, and collaborative decision-making. To relate the challenges to wider discourses on these topics, five underlying tensions were recognized. These include the tension between participatory action and critical discussion approaches for sustainability education, and the tension between drive towards unanimity and agreeing to disagree in collaborative educational planning. Finally, it is discussed how, and to what degree, the challenges and tensions can and should be mitigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Studies in Science Education
Nordic Studies in Science Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信