巴尔德效应:条件仲裁对《纽约公约》的威胁

Q3 Social Sciences

Arbitration International Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1093/arbint/aiac018

A. Lewis

{"title":"巴尔德效应:条件仲裁对《纽约公约》的威胁","authors":"A. Lewis","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiac018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article assesses the Russian rules for the arbitrability of certain types of Russian corporate and procurement disputes, under which the arbitration must be seated in Russia. It is argued that these rules violate the New York Convention, and that other Party States to the Convention should object to the Russian rules. Finally the article suggests that an available and effective means of so objecting can be found in the principle of reciprocity under the Convention.","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Balder effect: conditional arbitrability’s threat to the New York convention\",\"authors\":\"A. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/arbint/aiac018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article assesses the Russian rules for the arbitrability of certain types of Russian corporate and procurement disputes, under which the arbitration must be seated in Russia. It is argued that these rules violate the New York Convention, and that other Party States to the Convention should object to the Russian rules. Finally the article suggests that an available and effective means of so objecting can be found in the principle of reciprocity under the Convention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitration International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitration International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiac018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitration International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiac018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了俄罗斯关于某些类型的俄罗斯公司和采购纠纷的可仲裁性规则，根据该规则，仲裁必须在俄罗斯进行。有人认为，这些规则违反了《纽约公约》，《公约》的其他缔约国应反对俄罗斯的规则。最后，该条建议，在《公约》规定的互惠原则中可以找到一种可行和有效的反对手段。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Balder effect: conditional arbitrability’s threat to the New York convention

This article assesses the Russian rules for the arbitrability of certain types of Russian corporate and procurement disputes, under which the arbitration must be seated in Russia. It is argued that these rules violate the New York Convention, and that other Party States to the Convention should object to the Russian rules. Finally the article suggests that an available and effective means of so objecting can be found in the principle of reciprocity under the Convention.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Arbitration International Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Launched in 1985, Arbitration International provides quarterly coverage for national and international developments in the world of arbitration. The journal aims to maintain balance between academic debate and practical contributions to the field, providing both topical material on current developments and analytic scholarship of permanent interest. Arbitrators, counsel, judges, scholars and government officials will find the journal enhances their understanding of a broad range of topics in commercial and investment arbitration. Features include (i) articles covering all major arbitration rules and national jurisdictions written by respected international practitioners and scholars, (ii) cutting edge (case) notes covering recent developments and ongoing debates in the field, (iii) book reviews of the latest publications in the world of arbitration, (iv) Letters to the Editor and (v) agora grouping articles related to a common theme. Arbitration International maintains a balance between controversial subjects for debate and topics geared toward practical use by arbitrators, lawyers, academics, judges, corporate advisors and government officials.