“C 'est un bourgeois, mais non non - bourgeois ordinaire”:安格尔《路易-弗朗索瓦·贝尔坦肖像》的争议性后世

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 0 ART
R. Wrigley
{"title":"“C 'est un bourgeois, mais non non - bourgeois ordinaire”:安格尔《路易-弗朗索瓦·贝尔坦肖像》的争议性后世","authors":"R. Wrigley","doi":"10.1515/ZKG-2021-2004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ingres’s portrait of Louis-François Bertin (1832) has been universally accepted as a visual “apotheosis” of the newly powerful early 19th-century bourgeoisie in France. Here, we study the inconsistencies and contestation which contributed to this identification. Beginning with the moment of its first public exhibition in the 1833 Paris Salon, this article traces Bertin’s evolving reputation as an image of its epoch, focusing on its reappearance in public first at the Bazar Bonne-Nouvelle in 1846, and then in the display of Ingres’s works at the Exposition Universelle of 1855. This leads to a critical assessment of how the picture’s role as a political emblem has been related to later assertions that it also exemplified the artist’s incipient modernism. The exhibition of works by Ingres at the Paris Salon d’Automne in 1905 allows us to take stock of claims made about the picture’s status in the early 20th century. However, in contrast to the habitual desire to modernise Ingres (and thereby to detach him from a lingering taint of academicism), this article argues that a key element in the reception of Ingres’s portrait in the second half of the 19th century is a recognition of its rootedness in values emanating from the Revolution of 1789, embodied both in the person of LouisFrançois Bertin and Ingres’s representation of him.","PeriodicalId":43164,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KUNSTGESCHICHTE","volume":"84 1","pages":"220 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“C’est un bourgeois, mais non un bourgeois ordinaire”: The Contested Afterlife of Ingres’s Portrait of Louis-François Bertin\",\"authors\":\"R. Wrigley\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ZKG-2021-2004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Ingres’s portrait of Louis-François Bertin (1832) has been universally accepted as a visual “apotheosis” of the newly powerful early 19th-century bourgeoisie in France. Here, we study the inconsistencies and contestation which contributed to this identification. Beginning with the moment of its first public exhibition in the 1833 Paris Salon, this article traces Bertin’s evolving reputation as an image of its epoch, focusing on its reappearance in public first at the Bazar Bonne-Nouvelle in 1846, and then in the display of Ingres’s works at the Exposition Universelle of 1855. This leads to a critical assessment of how the picture’s role as a political emblem has been related to later assertions that it also exemplified the artist’s incipient modernism. The exhibition of works by Ingres at the Paris Salon d’Automne in 1905 allows us to take stock of claims made about the picture’s status in the early 20th century. However, in contrast to the habitual desire to modernise Ingres (and thereby to detach him from a lingering taint of academicism), this article argues that a key element in the reception of Ingres’s portrait in the second half of the 19th century is a recognition of its rootedness in values emanating from the Revolution of 1789, embodied both in the person of LouisFrançois Bertin and Ingres’s representation of him.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KUNSTGESCHICHTE\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"220 - 247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KUNSTGESCHICHTE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ZKG-2021-2004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KUNSTGESCHICHTE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ZKG-2021-2004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要英格尔斯的路易斯·弗朗索瓦·贝尔坦肖像(1832年)被普遍认为是19世纪初法国新强大资产阶级的视觉“典范”。在这里,我们研究了促成这种识别的不一致和争论。本文从1833年巴黎沙龙首次公开展览的那一刻开始,追溯了贝尔廷作为其时代形象的声誉不断演变,重点是它首次在1846年的新巴扎(Bazar Bonne Nouvelle)公开展出,然后在1855年的万国博览会(Exposition Universelle)上展出英格尔斯的作品。这导致了对这幅画作为政治象征的作用与后来的断言之间的关系的批判性评估,即它也体现了艺术家早期的现代主义。1905年,英格尔斯在巴黎汽车沙龙举办的作品展让我们得以评估20世纪初关于这幅画地位的说法。然而,与对英格尔斯进行现代化改造(从而使他摆脱挥之不去的学院主义污点)的习惯性愿望相反,本文认为,19世纪下半叶接受英格尔斯肖像的一个关键因素是承认其植根于1789年革命产生的价值观,体现在LouisFrançois Bertin的个人和Ingres对他的描绘中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“C’est un bourgeois, mais non un bourgeois ordinaire”: The Contested Afterlife of Ingres’s Portrait of Louis-François Bertin
Abstract Ingres’s portrait of Louis-François Bertin (1832) has been universally accepted as a visual “apotheosis” of the newly powerful early 19th-century bourgeoisie in France. Here, we study the inconsistencies and contestation which contributed to this identification. Beginning with the moment of its first public exhibition in the 1833 Paris Salon, this article traces Bertin’s evolving reputation as an image of its epoch, focusing on its reappearance in public first at the Bazar Bonne-Nouvelle in 1846, and then in the display of Ingres’s works at the Exposition Universelle of 1855. This leads to a critical assessment of how the picture’s role as a political emblem has been related to later assertions that it also exemplified the artist’s incipient modernism. The exhibition of works by Ingres at the Paris Salon d’Automne in 1905 allows us to take stock of claims made about the picture’s status in the early 20th century. However, in contrast to the habitual desire to modernise Ingres (and thereby to detach him from a lingering taint of academicism), this article argues that a key element in the reception of Ingres’s portrait in the second half of the 19th century is a recognition of its rootedness in values emanating from the Revolution of 1789, embodied both in the person of LouisFrançois Bertin and Ingres’s representation of him.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: We publish in the following languages: German, English, French, and Italian. Manuscripts must be submitted in one of these languages. The editors reserve the right to edit, abridge or reject any material. Unsolicited manuscripts can be returned to the author only if the proper amount of return postage has been sent with the manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信