试件高径比对黏性土无侧限抗压强度的影响

IF 0.7 Q4 MECHANICS
Haile Tsegay Gebresamuel, Damtew Tsige Melese, Y. Boru, Alemu Mosisa Legese
{"title":"试件高径比对黏性土无侧限抗压强度的影响","authors":"Haile Tsegay Gebresamuel, Damtew Tsige Melese, Y. Boru, Alemu Mosisa Legese","doi":"10.2478/sgem-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The undrained shear strength (Su) and cohesion (Cu) of cohesive soils are frequently determined using an unconfined compression test. However, the test results are heavily dependent on specimen size. This causes uncertainty in geotechnical analyses, constitutive models, and designs by overestimating or underestimating the shear strength of cohesive soils. Therefore, the study aims to assess the effect of the height-to-diameter ratio on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cohesive soil. The soil specimen was tested on a compacted cylindrical specimen at the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content with a height to diameter (H/D) ratio of 1–3 for 38, 50, and 100 mm specimen diameters. Disturbed sample specimens were considered for the laboratory program. Accordingly, the standard Proctor compaction test determines soil classification and compaction characteristics. The unconfined compression test was performed for undisturbed and compacted remolded states of various diameters of cohesive soil specimens to investigate the strength variation with the specimen variation in H/D ratio. The laboratory test results revealed that cohesive soil's unconfined compression strength value drops rapidly with height-to-diameter ratios and the soil specimens’ diameter increases. However, the UCS value was stable at H/D ratio from 1.75 to 2.25. As the specimens’ diameter and H/D ratio increased, the peak UCS value axial strain decreased. Similarly, the gap between the axial strains of peak UCS value for the smallest and the most significant H/D ratio decreased with increase in the specimens’ diameter.","PeriodicalId":44626,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","volume":"45 1","pages":"112 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Specimens’ Height to Diameter Ratio on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil\",\"authors\":\"Haile Tsegay Gebresamuel, Damtew Tsige Melese, Y. Boru, Alemu Mosisa Legese\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sgem-2023-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The undrained shear strength (Su) and cohesion (Cu) of cohesive soils are frequently determined using an unconfined compression test. However, the test results are heavily dependent on specimen size. This causes uncertainty in geotechnical analyses, constitutive models, and designs by overestimating or underestimating the shear strength of cohesive soils. Therefore, the study aims to assess the effect of the height-to-diameter ratio on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cohesive soil. The soil specimen was tested on a compacted cylindrical specimen at the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content with a height to diameter (H/D) ratio of 1–3 for 38, 50, and 100 mm specimen diameters. Disturbed sample specimens were considered for the laboratory program. Accordingly, the standard Proctor compaction test determines soil classification and compaction characteristics. The unconfined compression test was performed for undisturbed and compacted remolded states of various diameters of cohesive soil specimens to investigate the strength variation with the specimen variation in H/D ratio. The laboratory test results revealed that cohesive soil's unconfined compression strength value drops rapidly with height-to-diameter ratios and the soil specimens’ diameter increases. However, the UCS value was stable at H/D ratio from 1.75 to 2.25. As the specimens’ diameter and H/D ratio increased, the peak UCS value axial strain decreased. Similarly, the gap between the axial strains of peak UCS value for the smallest and the most significant H/D ratio decreased with increase in the specimens’ diameter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"112 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2023-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要粘性土的不排水抗剪强度(Su)和粘聚力(Cu)通常采用无侧限压缩试验来测定。然而,测试结果在很大程度上取决于试样的大小。这导致了岩土分析、本构模型和设计的不确定性,高估或低估了粘性土的抗剪强度。因此,本研究旨在探讨高径比对粘性土无侧限抗压强度的影响。土样在38、50和100 mm试件直径下,以最大干密度和最佳含水率,高径比(H/D)为1-3的压实圆柱试件上进行试验。在实验室程序中考虑了扰动样品。因此,标准的普罗克特压实试验确定了土壤的分类和压实特性。通过无侧限压缩试验,对不同直径的粘性土试件进行原状和压实重塑状态,研究其强度随试件H/D比的变化规律。室内试验结果表明,黏性土的无侧限抗压强度值随着土样高径比的增大而迅速下降;在1.75 ~ 2.25 H/D范围内,UCS值较为稳定。随着试件直径和H/D比的增大,轴向应变峰值UCS值减小。同样,最小和最显著H/D比轴向应变峰值UCS值之间的差距随着试件直径的增加而减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Specimens’ Height to Diameter Ratio on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil
Abstract The undrained shear strength (Su) and cohesion (Cu) of cohesive soils are frequently determined using an unconfined compression test. However, the test results are heavily dependent on specimen size. This causes uncertainty in geotechnical analyses, constitutive models, and designs by overestimating or underestimating the shear strength of cohesive soils. Therefore, the study aims to assess the effect of the height-to-diameter ratio on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cohesive soil. The soil specimen was tested on a compacted cylindrical specimen at the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content with a height to diameter (H/D) ratio of 1–3 for 38, 50, and 100 mm specimen diameters. Disturbed sample specimens were considered for the laboratory program. Accordingly, the standard Proctor compaction test determines soil classification and compaction characteristics. The unconfined compression test was performed for undisturbed and compacted remolded states of various diameters of cohesive soil specimens to investigate the strength variation with the specimen variation in H/D ratio. The laboratory test results revealed that cohesive soil's unconfined compression strength value drops rapidly with height-to-diameter ratios and the soil specimens’ diameter increases. However, the UCS value was stable at H/D ratio from 1.75 to 2.25. As the specimens’ diameter and H/D ratio increased, the peak UCS value axial strain decreased. Similarly, the gap between the axial strains of peak UCS value for the smallest and the most significant H/D ratio decreased with increase in the specimens’ diameter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international journal ‘Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica’ covers new developments in the broad areas of geomechanics as well as structural mechanics. The journal welcomes contributions dealing with original theoretical, numerical as well as experimental work. The following topics are of special interest: Constitutive relations for geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, etc.) Modeling of mechanical behaviour of heterogeneous materials at different scales Analysis of coupled thermo-hydro-chemo-mechanical problems Modeling of instabilities and localized deformation Experimental investigations of material properties at different scales Numerical algorithms: formulation and performance Application of numerical techniques to analysis of problems involving foundations, underground structures, slopes and embankment Risk and reliability analysis Analysis of concrete and masonry structures Modeling of case histories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信