法国社区监督黑匣子探索

IF 0.8 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
M. Herzog-Evans, Sophie Berjot, Marije Keulen de Vos
{"title":"法国社区监督黑匣子探索","authors":"M. Herzog-Evans, Sophie Berjot, Marije Keulen de Vos","doi":"10.1177/20662203221140643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how probation officers (POs) in France employ evidence-based practice in the real world. Using 78 audio tapes of 11 POs and 33 offenders in 2 probations services, we assessed PO skills with an adapted version of the Jersey Checklist. Our results suggest that French probation officers generally possess good communication skills, and use – to a certain extent – core correctional practices. They do, however, underperform with regard to cognitive behavioural techniques.","PeriodicalId":44523,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Probation","volume":"15 1","pages":"1 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the black box of French community supervision\",\"authors\":\"M. Herzog-Evans, Sophie Berjot, Marije Keulen de Vos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20662203221140643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores how probation officers (POs) in France employ evidence-based practice in the real world. Using 78 audio tapes of 11 POs and 33 offenders in 2 probations services, we assessed PO skills with an adapted version of the Jersey Checklist. Our results suggest that French probation officers generally possess good communication skills, and use – to a certain extent – core correctional practices. They do, however, underperform with regard to cognitive behavioural techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Probation\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Probation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203221140643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Probation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203221140643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了法国缓刑监督官如何在现实世界中运用循证实践。我们使用了两个缓刑服务机构的11名PO和33名罪犯的78盘录音带,用改编版的泽西岛检查表评估了PO的技能。我们的研究结果表明,法国缓刑监督官通常具有良好的沟通技能,并在一定程度上使用核心惩教实践。然而,他们在认知行为技术方面确实表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the black box of French community supervision
This article explores how probation officers (POs) in France employ evidence-based practice in the real world. Using 78 audio tapes of 11 POs and 33 offenders in 2 probations services, we assessed PO skills with an adapted version of the Jersey Checklist. Our results suggest that French probation officers generally possess good communication skills, and use – to a certain extent – core correctional practices. They do, however, underperform with regard to cognitive behavioural techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Probation
European Journal of Probation CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信