{"title":"对照组(常规治疗)新冠肺炎患者羟氯喹病毒学清除率、有效性和安全性的核对——系统回顾和Meta-Analysis","authors":"Athira Mohan S, Shaiju S. Dharan","doi":"10.52793/acmr.2021.2(2)-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Destitute of an effective treatment, several potential repurposed drugs have been tried in COVID-19. Despite unavailability of anecdotal evidence, several guidelines granted both Chloroquine (CQ) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treatment. Clinical studies relating to those in COVID-19 disease has reported conflicting results. We sought to systematically evaluate the clinical effects contact, mainly in health workers [8]. On March 30, 2020 FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in order to use both CQ and HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19. FDA issued EUA for the second time in the history. Formerly it was given for an investigational neuraminidase inhibitor, Peramivir during 2009-2010 to treat severely ill patients with H1N1 influenza [9]. The meta-analysis of 5 studies that reported rate of virological clearance or PCR negativity (n=312) found no benefit in HCQ arm. {OR, 1.863; 95% CI, 1.024 to 3.389; p=0.041} with a moderate heterogeneity (I 2 =70.3%, P=0.009). meta-analysis of 5 studies (n=1710) that reported about ADR outcomes found that, there exist an increased risk of ADRs in HCQ arm. {OR, 2.648; 95% CI, 2.068 to 7.717; p=0.000}, with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, P=0.417). 6 studies (n=4,341) showed a significant increase in mortality in HCQ arm when compared with control arm {OR, 1.182; 95% CI, 0.981 to 1.425; p=0.079}, with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 82.0%, P=0.000). Conclusions: The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a reduced antiviral efficacy in reducing mortality, ADR occurrence and has a decreased virological clearance in patients with COVID-19. in COVID-19 patients.","PeriodicalId":72085,"journal":{"name":"Advances in clinical and medical research (Chandigarh, India)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collation Of Hydroxychloroquine Virological Clearance, Effectiveness, Safety In Covid-19 Patients With Control Group (Conventional Therapy) – A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Athira Mohan S, Shaiju S. Dharan\",\"doi\":\"10.52793/acmr.2021.2(2)-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Destitute of an effective treatment, several potential repurposed drugs have been tried in COVID-19. Despite unavailability of anecdotal evidence, several guidelines granted both Chloroquine (CQ) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treatment. Clinical studies relating to those in COVID-19 disease has reported conflicting results. We sought to systematically evaluate the clinical effects contact, mainly in health workers [8]. On March 30, 2020 FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in order to use both CQ and HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19. FDA issued EUA for the second time in the history. Formerly it was given for an investigational neuraminidase inhibitor, Peramivir during 2009-2010 to treat severely ill patients with H1N1 influenza [9]. The meta-analysis of 5 studies that reported rate of virological clearance or PCR negativity (n=312) found no benefit in HCQ arm. {OR, 1.863; 95% CI, 1.024 to 3.389; p=0.041} with a moderate heterogeneity (I 2 =70.3%, P=0.009). meta-analysis of 5 studies (n=1710) that reported about ADR outcomes found that, there exist an increased risk of ADRs in HCQ arm. {OR, 2.648; 95% CI, 2.068 to 7.717; p=0.000}, with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, P=0.417). 6 studies (n=4,341) showed a significant increase in mortality in HCQ arm when compared with control arm {OR, 1.182; 95% CI, 0.981 to 1.425; p=0.079}, with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 82.0%, P=0.000). Conclusions: The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a reduced antiviral efficacy in reducing mortality, ADR occurrence and has a decreased virological clearance in patients with COVID-19. in COVID-19 patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in clinical and medical research (Chandigarh, India)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in clinical and medical research (Chandigarh, India)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52793/acmr.2021.2(2)-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in clinical and medical research (Chandigarh, India)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52793/acmr.2021.2(2)-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Collation Of Hydroxychloroquine Virological Clearance, Effectiveness, Safety In Covid-19 Patients With Control Group (Conventional Therapy) – A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
Objectives: Destitute of an effective treatment, several potential repurposed drugs have been tried in COVID-19. Despite unavailability of anecdotal evidence, several guidelines granted both Chloroquine (CQ) and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treatment. Clinical studies relating to those in COVID-19 disease has reported conflicting results. We sought to systematically evaluate the clinical effects contact, mainly in health workers [8]. On March 30, 2020 FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in order to use both CQ and HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19. FDA issued EUA for the second time in the history. Formerly it was given for an investigational neuraminidase inhibitor, Peramivir during 2009-2010 to treat severely ill patients with H1N1 influenza [9]. The meta-analysis of 5 studies that reported rate of virological clearance or PCR negativity (n=312) found no benefit in HCQ arm. {OR, 1.863; 95% CI, 1.024 to 3.389; p=0.041} with a moderate heterogeneity (I 2 =70.3%, P=0.009). meta-analysis of 5 studies (n=1710) that reported about ADR outcomes found that, there exist an increased risk of ADRs in HCQ arm. {OR, 2.648; 95% CI, 2.068 to 7.717; p=0.000}, with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, P=0.417). 6 studies (n=4,341) showed a significant increase in mortality in HCQ arm when compared with control arm {OR, 1.182; 95% CI, 0.981 to 1.425; p=0.079}, with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 82.0%, P=0.000). Conclusions: The systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a reduced antiviral efficacy in reducing mortality, ADR occurrence and has a decreased virological clearance in patients with COVID-19. in COVID-19 patients.