人类、海豚和鼠海豚:在俄勒冈州海边的球座遗址的调查,公元100-800年

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Hope Loiselle
{"title":"人类、海豚和鼠海豚:在俄勒冈州海边的球座遗址的调查,公元100-800年","authors":"Hope Loiselle","doi":"10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small cetaceans are understudied compared to whales and pinnipeds even though they represent a high -ranking prey choice when available in the environment. Building upon previous faunal analyses at the Par-Tee site, Seaside, Oregon that investigated whaling, this analysis of dolphin and porpoise remains suggests that people were hunting small cetaceans between AD 100–800 on the Oregon coast, especially harbor porpoise, which was found significantly more than any other cetacean species at the site. The quantity of small cetacean bone is unlikely to be the result of only acquiring stranded individuals. While there is no direct evidence of hunting, ethnographic literature and archaeologically recovered hunting technologies like harpoons provide insight into the means by which these species may have been hunted. Received November 14, 2019 OPEN ACCESS Accepted July 1, 2020 DOI 10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662 Published August 14, 2020","PeriodicalId":43787,"journal":{"name":"Ethnobiology Letters","volume":"11 1","pages":"58-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Humans, Dolphins, and Porpoises: Investigations at the Par-Tee Site, Seaside, Oregon, AD 100–800\",\"authors\":\"Hope Loiselle\",\"doi\":\"10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small cetaceans are understudied compared to whales and pinnipeds even though they represent a high -ranking prey choice when available in the environment. Building upon previous faunal analyses at the Par-Tee site, Seaside, Oregon that investigated whaling, this analysis of dolphin and porpoise remains suggests that people were hunting small cetaceans between AD 100–800 on the Oregon coast, especially harbor porpoise, which was found significantly more than any other cetacean species at the site. The quantity of small cetacean bone is unlikely to be the result of only acquiring stranded individuals. While there is no direct evidence of hunting, ethnographic literature and archaeologically recovered hunting technologies like harpoons provide insight into the means by which these species may have been hunted. Received November 14, 2019 OPEN ACCESS Accepted July 1, 2020 DOI 10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662 Published August 14, 2020\",\"PeriodicalId\":43787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnobiology Letters\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"58-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnobiology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnobiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

与鲸鱼和鳍足类动物相比,小型鲸目动物的研究不足,尽管它们在环境中是一种高级的猎物选择。基于之前在俄勒冈州海边的part - tee遗址调查捕鲸的动物群分析,这次对海豚和鼠海豚遗骸的分析表明,公元100-800年间,人们在俄勒冈海岸捕杀小型鲸类动物,尤其是海港鼠海豚,它比该遗址发现的任何其他鲸类动物都要多。小鲸骨的数量不太可能是捕获搁浅个体的结果。虽然没有狩猎的直接证据,但民族志文献和考古发现的狩猎技术(如鱼叉)为这些物种可能被狩猎的方式提供了见解。收稿日期:2019年11月14日OPEN ACCESS接收日期:2020年7月1日DOI: 10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662发布于2020年8月14日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Humans, Dolphins, and Porpoises: Investigations at the Par-Tee Site, Seaside, Oregon, AD 100–800
Small cetaceans are understudied compared to whales and pinnipeds even though they represent a high -ranking prey choice when available in the environment. Building upon previous faunal analyses at the Par-Tee site, Seaside, Oregon that investigated whaling, this analysis of dolphin and porpoise remains suggests that people were hunting small cetaceans between AD 100–800 on the Oregon coast, especially harbor porpoise, which was found significantly more than any other cetacean species at the site. The quantity of small cetacean bone is unlikely to be the result of only acquiring stranded individuals. While there is no direct evidence of hunting, ethnographic literature and archaeologically recovered hunting technologies like harpoons provide insight into the means by which these species may have been hunted. Received November 14, 2019 OPEN ACCESS Accepted July 1, 2020 DOI 10.14237/ebl.11.1.2020.1662 Published August 14, 2020
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnobiology Letters
Ethnobiology Letters ANTHROPOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信