高等教育考试网络化的阴暗面:一个新兴国家的视角

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Isuru Koswatte, Chandrika Fernando, N. Jayawardena
{"title":"高等教育考试网络化的阴暗面:一个新兴国家的视角","authors":"Isuru Koswatte, Chandrika Fernando, N. Jayawardena","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-09-2022-0295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nHigher educational institutes (HEIs) are experiencing a significant shift towards online education, which has been fast-forwarded with the global pandemic of COVID-19. The forced shift has also exposed many vulnerabilities in online education, especially assessments. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential dark side of the digital transformation of examinations through the lens of university students.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study involves a sample of 127 university students from the fields of business and science, technology, education and management (STEM) and the key factors affecting student perception were assessed quantitatively to explore the interrelationships.\n\n\nFindings\nResults revealed that both business and STEM students have a similar impression of the use of online examinations, and the majority still have mixed feelings about them as a replacement for physical examinations. The regrouping of the factors revealed two key dimensions, trustworthiness and apprehensible education, as key areas of student perception in the context of online examinations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study aims to strengthen the understanding of Kolb’s experiential learning mechanism through a discussion on the importance of abstract conceptualization as opposed to concrete experience in the establishment of the online assessment and learning space. Practically speaking, increasing investment in internet infrastructure and forming strategic alliances with important parties, like internet providers, to create uninterrupted network coverage, are an effective place to start if one wants to make sure that the process of moving to online learning is becoming more and more accepted by educators, students, and the general public.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe online transition to higher education has seen expedited growth since the pandemic and has not given much room for many HEIs globally to adjust. The procedures and techniques implemented take a Western lens, and less attention is given to the emerging context and its context-specific characteristics in such implementation. This study takes the theoretical lens of Kolb and proposes the key learnings for a successful online transition to assessment in emerging contexts.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dark side of online transition of exams in higher education: a perspective of an emerging nation\",\"authors\":\"Isuru Koswatte, Chandrika Fernando, N. Jayawardena\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/vjikms-09-2022-0295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nHigher educational institutes (HEIs) are experiencing a significant shift towards online education, which has been fast-forwarded with the global pandemic of COVID-19. The forced shift has also exposed many vulnerabilities in online education, especially assessments. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential dark side of the digital transformation of examinations through the lens of university students.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study involves a sample of 127 university students from the fields of business and science, technology, education and management (STEM) and the key factors affecting student perception were assessed quantitatively to explore the interrelationships.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResults revealed that both business and STEM students have a similar impression of the use of online examinations, and the majority still have mixed feelings about them as a replacement for physical examinations. The regrouping of the factors revealed two key dimensions, trustworthiness and apprehensible education, as key areas of student perception in the context of online examinations.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study aims to strengthen the understanding of Kolb’s experiential learning mechanism through a discussion on the importance of abstract conceptualization as opposed to concrete experience in the establishment of the online assessment and learning space. Practically speaking, increasing investment in internet infrastructure and forming strategic alliances with important parties, like internet providers, to create uninterrupted network coverage, are an effective place to start if one wants to make sure that the process of moving to online learning is becoming more and more accepted by educators, students, and the general public.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe online transition to higher education has seen expedited growth since the pandemic and has not given much room for many HEIs globally to adjust. The procedures and techniques implemented take a Western lens, and less attention is given to the emerging context and its context-specific characteristics in such implementation. This study takes the theoretical lens of Kolb and proposes the key learnings for a successful online transition to assessment in emerging contexts.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-09-2022-0295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-09-2022-0295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的高等教育机构(HEI)正在经历向在线教育的重大转变,随着新冠肺炎的全球大流行,在线教育也在迅速发展。这种被迫的转变也暴露了在线教育的许多弱点,尤其是评估。本研究的目的是通过大学生的视角来调查考试数字化转型的潜在黑暗面。设计/方法论/方法这项研究涉及来自商业和科学、技术、教育和管理(STEM)领域的127名大学生,并对影响学生感知的关键因素进行了定量评估,以探索其相互关系。FindingsResults显示,商科和STEM学生对在线考试的使用有着相似的印象,大多数人仍然对在线考试作为体检的替代品有着复杂的感受。这些因素的重新组合揭示了两个关键维度,可信度和可理解的教育,这是在线考试背景下学生感知的关键领域。研究局限性/含义本研究旨在通过讨论抽象概念化相对于具体经验在建立在线评估和学习空间中的重要性,加强对科尔布经验学习机制的理解。实际上,如果一个人想确保向在线学习的过程越来越被教育工作者、学生和公众接受,那么增加对互联网基础设施的投资,并与互联网提供商等重要各方结成战略联盟,以创造不间断的网络覆盖,是一个有效的起点。独创性/价值自疫情以来,向高等教育的在线转型加速了增长,并没有给全球许多高等教育机构太大的调整空间。实施的程序和技术采用了西方的视角,在这种实施中很少关注新出现的背景及其特定背景的特征。这项研究从Kolb的理论视角出发,提出了在新兴背景下成功在线过渡到评估的关键经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The dark side of online transition of exams in higher education: a perspective of an emerging nation
Purpose Higher educational institutes (HEIs) are experiencing a significant shift towards online education, which has been fast-forwarded with the global pandemic of COVID-19. The forced shift has also exposed many vulnerabilities in online education, especially assessments. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential dark side of the digital transformation of examinations through the lens of university students. Design/methodology/approach This study involves a sample of 127 university students from the fields of business and science, technology, education and management (STEM) and the key factors affecting student perception were assessed quantitatively to explore the interrelationships. Findings Results revealed that both business and STEM students have a similar impression of the use of online examinations, and the majority still have mixed feelings about them as a replacement for physical examinations. The regrouping of the factors revealed two key dimensions, trustworthiness and apprehensible education, as key areas of student perception in the context of online examinations. Research limitations/implications This study aims to strengthen the understanding of Kolb’s experiential learning mechanism through a discussion on the importance of abstract conceptualization as opposed to concrete experience in the establishment of the online assessment and learning space. Practically speaking, increasing investment in internet infrastructure and forming strategic alliances with important parties, like internet providers, to create uninterrupted network coverage, are an effective place to start if one wants to make sure that the process of moving to online learning is becoming more and more accepted by educators, students, and the general public. Originality/value The online transition to higher education has seen expedited growth since the pandemic and has not given much room for many HEIs globally to adjust. The procedures and techniques implemented take a Western lens, and less attention is given to the emerging context and its context-specific characteristics in such implementation. This study takes the theoretical lens of Kolb and proposes the key learnings for a successful online transition to assessment in emerging contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信