一个充满批判性思想的夏天。TomažMastnak和Dimitrij Rupel,1986年南斯拉夫和斯洛文尼亚公众之间的斯洛文尼亚批判知识分子

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Marko Zajc
{"title":"一个充满批判性思想的夏天。TomažMastnak和Dimitrij Rupel,1986年南斯拉夫和斯洛文尼亚公众之间的斯洛文尼亚批判知识分子","authors":"Marko Zajc","doi":"10.32874/SHS.2020-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the following contribution is to carry out a historical analysis of the role, significance, and position of the critical Slovenian intellectuals in the Yugoslav and Slovenian public in the last decade of Socialist Yugoslavia (more precisely, in 1986). The central focus is on the intellectuals Tomaž Mastnak and Dimitrij Rupel and their standpoints in the context of the relations between the Slovenian and Yugoslav public. For our analysis, the contents published by the media are more important than the decision-making processes in the political forums that we can follow in the relevant archival sources. We are interested in the political history of the public rather than in the history of politics as a decision-making process in the circles that wield political power.","PeriodicalId":38093,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica Slovenica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poletni aferi kritičnih misli. Tomaž Mastnak in Dimitrij Rupel, slovenska kritična intelektualca med jugoslovansko in slovensko javnostjo v letu 1986\",\"authors\":\"Marko Zajc\",\"doi\":\"10.32874/SHS.2020-26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the following contribution is to carry out a historical analysis of the role, significance, and position of the critical Slovenian intellectuals in the Yugoslav and Slovenian public in the last decade of Socialist Yugoslavia (more precisely, in 1986). The central focus is on the intellectuals Tomaž Mastnak and Dimitrij Rupel and their standpoints in the context of the relations between the Slovenian and Yugoslav public. For our analysis, the contents published by the media are more important than the decision-making processes in the political forums that we can follow in the relevant archival sources. We are interested in the political history of the public rather than in the history of politics as a decision-making process in the circles that wield political power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Historica Slovenica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Historica Slovenica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32874/SHS.2020-26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32874/SHS.2020-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以下贡献的目的是对社会主义南斯拉夫最后十年(更准确地说,1986年)中南斯拉夫和斯洛文尼亚公众中批评的斯洛文尼亚知识分子的角色、意义和地位进行历史分析。本书的中心焦点是知识分子tomajo Mastnak和Dimitrij Rupel,以及他们在斯洛文尼亚和南斯拉夫公众关系背景下的立场。在我们的分析中,媒体发布的内容比我们可以在相关档案来源中跟踪的政治论坛的决策过程更重要。我们感兴趣的是公众的政治史,而不是作为行使政治权力的圈子中的决策过程的政治史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poletni aferi kritičnih misli. Tomaž Mastnak in Dimitrij Rupel, slovenska kritična intelektualca med jugoslovansko in slovensko javnostjo v letu 1986
The purpose of the following contribution is to carry out a historical analysis of the role, significance, and position of the critical Slovenian intellectuals in the Yugoslav and Slovenian public in the last decade of Socialist Yugoslavia (more precisely, in 1986). The central focus is on the intellectuals Tomaž Mastnak and Dimitrij Rupel and their standpoints in the context of the relations between the Slovenian and Yugoslav public. For our analysis, the contents published by the media are more important than the decision-making processes in the political forums that we can follow in the relevant archival sources. We are interested in the political history of the public rather than in the history of politics as a decision-making process in the circles that wield political power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Historica Slovenica
Studia Historica Slovenica Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studia historica Slovenica (SHS) is a periodical scientific publication published by the Historical association of Franc Kovačič PhD, Koroška cesta 160, Maribor. The publication publishes historical articles and other humanistic and sociological articles that adjoin historical science. Studia historica Slovenica is issued in three volumes a year. The first two volumes publish articles in Slovene language – with summaries in English, German, Italian, French or Russian language and abstracts in English. The third volume is a foreign language volume, which is intended for publishing articles written by local and foreign authors in one of the world languages – with summaries and abstracts in Slovene language. An article, delivered or sent to the editorial board, can comprise of at most 30 one-sided typed pages with 30 lines per page (52,750 print signs). It has to be delivered on a computer diskette (edited in Word for Windows) and in a printed form. Image material in the form of a laser print or in electron form (PDF or TIF format) must be equipped with subtitles and the source quotation. The author must submit following data: name and surname, academic title, occupation, institution of occupation, its address and e-mail. Delivered article must be equipped with: a summary (30-45 lines), an abstract (6-10 lines) and key words. Summary must be understandable by itself, without reading the article as a whole. In writing whole sentences must be used, less known abbreviations and shortenings should be avoided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信