后covid -19环境下缅因州的不平等和劳动力发展

T. Remington
{"title":"后covid -19环境下缅因州的不平等和劳动力发展","authors":"T. Remington","doi":"10.53558/vhcd4408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has stricken American workers deeply, causing widespread layoffs and accelerating the longer-term disappearance of jobs available to workers with limited skills and education. As a result, its impact has exacerbated inequalities of income and opportunity. A long-term strategy for postpandemic economic development in Maine will require building bridges from existing skill sets to jobs offering greater employment opportunity and security. Existing research shows that when income and security are addressed as a shared responsibility on the part of workers, employers, and taxpayers, economic growth can expand opportunity and reduce inequality. Maine can take advantage of the COVID-19 crisis to restructure the institutional environment in ways that will align the incentives of the public and private sectors and will achieve these goals. and demographic distribution of deaths from suicide, alcohol abuse, and opioid overdoses, which have been highest among white males in the regions hardest hit by the loss of decent-paying jobs. The pandemic has deepened these trends. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the 12-month period from May 2019 to May 2020 saw the highest number of deaths from drug overdoses ever recorded in a one-year span. The pandemic, however, was not the only factor in this increase; overdose deaths were rising in 2019 as well.1 Still, the COVID-19 pandemic has burdened the most vulnerable members of society with even heavier economic and psychological stress. Low-wage workers compose a large share of the country’s workforce—44 percent as of January 2020—and have been more severely affected by the pandemic than higherearning workers (Escobari et al. 2019).2 Layoffs threaten their security in several ways, including the loss of housing and of health insurance (Garfield et al. 2020). Even before the pandemic, about a quarter of those living in rental housing were paying more than half their gross monthly income on rent. By January 2021, about 20 percent of all renters had fallen behind on their rent payments; 40 percent of children in households that rented faced difficulty with food, housing, or both (CBPP 2021; Dougherty 2021). Approximately 30 million people work in the retail and hospitality fields, almost 20 percent of the total US labor force. Most of those people work at wage levels below the median wage (77 percent in retail, 93 percent in hospitality). These are the most vulnerable jobs: wages are low, health insurance coverage is sparse, and the COVID-19 pandemic has led to heavy job losses. Whereas from January 2020 to January 2021, the unemployment rate rose from 4 percent to 6 percent for all workers, it only rose from 2.5 percent to 3.4 percent for people working in financial services but from 5.9 percent to 15.9 percent for those in leisure and hospitality (US BLS 2021). Low-wage workers are the least likely to be able to switch to online work; their educational levels tend to be low; and they are disproportionately likely to be female, Black, and Hispanic. The COVID crisis, therefore, is dealing a severe, multifaceted blow to the low-wage segment of the workforce. Low-wage workers are not only the most likely to be laid off, they are also the most likely to lose employment-based health insurance or to lack it in the first place. Loss of employment due to the pandemic means that close to 27 million people are at risk of losing their health insurance (Garfield et al. 2020). In principle, a majority of these individuals may become eligible for Medicaid or for marketplace subsidies through the ACA but only in those states that have expanded Medicaid. And a certain share of them will not be eligible for ACA subsidies due to income level or citizenship status. For industries that were already losing jobs, the pandemic has accelerated a painful transition and intensified the harsh social and economic consequences of our high and rising inequality. High inequality in the distribution of economic and social opportunity produces a gradient in health. Research shows that there is a direct relation between socioeconomic status and health, whether measured as the number of healthy days people experience in a month or in terms of their overall health status (Case and Deaton 2020). Health levels vary systematically for all racial and ethnic categories by income and education. This is true of geographic inequality as well. Across the country, the impact of the pandemic has varied systematically by population group, industry, and geography (Bahar 2020). People living in densely populated areas and particularly in multiperson, multigeneration households or congregant living facilities are at greater risk for becoming infected and spreading infection more widely. People working in jobs requiring a high, prolonged, and intensive level of face-to-face contact, such as assembly line manufacturing, food processing, retail sales, and personal care services, are similarly at higher risk. Groups that have been systematically disadvantaged in access to good housing, health care, education, and job opportunities—particularly minority and immigrant groups—are at greater risk from the illness due to higher underlying rates of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, poor nutrition, and other chronic conditions (Owen et al. 2020). Where these risk factors linked to geography, industry, and demography overlap, clusters of illness develop and spread at especially high rates. Maine and the Economic Impact of COVID-19 In some respects, the COVID pandemic has affected Maine in the same ways it has affected the rest of the country, while in other respects, the impact on Maine is distinctive. In recent decades, the labor market in Maine has been slightly tighter than that of the country as a whole MAINE POLICY REVIEW • Vol. 30, No. 2 • 2021 117 POST-COVID-19 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT","PeriodicalId":34576,"journal":{"name":"Maine Policy Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequality and Workforce Development in Maine in the Post-COVID-19 Environment\",\"authors\":\"T. Remington\",\"doi\":\"10.53558/vhcd4408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has stricken American workers deeply, causing widespread layoffs and accelerating the longer-term disappearance of jobs available to workers with limited skills and education. As a result, its impact has exacerbated inequalities of income and opportunity. A long-term strategy for postpandemic economic development in Maine will require building bridges from existing skill sets to jobs offering greater employment opportunity and security. Existing research shows that when income and security are addressed as a shared responsibility on the part of workers, employers, and taxpayers, economic growth can expand opportunity and reduce inequality. Maine can take advantage of the COVID-19 crisis to restructure the institutional environment in ways that will align the incentives of the public and private sectors and will achieve these goals. and demographic distribution of deaths from suicide, alcohol abuse, and opioid overdoses, which have been highest among white males in the regions hardest hit by the loss of decent-paying jobs. The pandemic has deepened these trends. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the 12-month period from May 2019 to May 2020 saw the highest number of deaths from drug overdoses ever recorded in a one-year span. The pandemic, however, was not the only factor in this increase; overdose deaths were rising in 2019 as well.1 Still, the COVID-19 pandemic has burdened the most vulnerable members of society with even heavier economic and psychological stress. Low-wage workers compose a large share of the country’s workforce—44 percent as of January 2020—and have been more severely affected by the pandemic than higherearning workers (Escobari et al. 2019).2 Layoffs threaten their security in several ways, including the loss of housing and of health insurance (Garfield et al. 2020). Even before the pandemic, about a quarter of those living in rental housing were paying more than half their gross monthly income on rent. By January 2021, about 20 percent of all renters had fallen behind on their rent payments; 40 percent of children in households that rented faced difficulty with food, housing, or both (CBPP 2021; Dougherty 2021). Approximately 30 million people work in the retail and hospitality fields, almost 20 percent of the total US labor force. Most of those people work at wage levels below the median wage (77 percent in retail, 93 percent in hospitality). These are the most vulnerable jobs: wages are low, health insurance coverage is sparse, and the COVID-19 pandemic has led to heavy job losses. Whereas from January 2020 to January 2021, the unemployment rate rose from 4 percent to 6 percent for all workers, it only rose from 2.5 percent to 3.4 percent for people working in financial services but from 5.9 percent to 15.9 percent for those in leisure and hospitality (US BLS 2021). Low-wage workers are the least likely to be able to switch to online work; their educational levels tend to be low; and they are disproportionately likely to be female, Black, and Hispanic. The COVID crisis, therefore, is dealing a severe, multifaceted blow to the low-wage segment of the workforce. Low-wage workers are not only the most likely to be laid off, they are also the most likely to lose employment-based health insurance or to lack it in the first place. Loss of employment due to the pandemic means that close to 27 million people are at risk of losing their health insurance (Garfield et al. 2020). In principle, a majority of these individuals may become eligible for Medicaid or for marketplace subsidies through the ACA but only in those states that have expanded Medicaid. And a certain share of them will not be eligible for ACA subsidies due to income level or citizenship status. For industries that were already losing jobs, the pandemic has accelerated a painful transition and intensified the harsh social and economic consequences of our high and rising inequality. High inequality in the distribution of economic and social opportunity produces a gradient in health. Research shows that there is a direct relation between socioeconomic status and health, whether measured as the number of healthy days people experience in a month or in terms of their overall health status (Case and Deaton 2020). Health levels vary systematically for all racial and ethnic categories by income and education. This is true of geographic inequality as well. Across the country, the impact of the pandemic has varied systematically by population group, industry, and geography (Bahar 2020). People living in densely populated areas and particularly in multiperson, multigeneration households or congregant living facilities are at greater risk for becoming infected and spreading infection more widely. People working in jobs requiring a high, prolonged, and intensive level of face-to-face contact, such as assembly line manufacturing, food processing, retail sales, and personal care services, are similarly at higher risk. Groups that have been systematically disadvantaged in access to good housing, health care, education, and job opportunities—particularly minority and immigrant groups—are at greater risk from the illness due to higher underlying rates of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, poor nutrition, and other chronic conditions (Owen et al. 2020). Where these risk factors linked to geography, industry, and demography overlap, clusters of illness develop and spread at especially high rates. Maine and the Economic Impact of COVID-19 In some respects, the COVID pandemic has affected Maine in the same ways it has affected the rest of the country, while in other respects, the impact on Maine is distinctive. In recent decades, the labor market in Maine has been slightly tighter than that of the country as a whole MAINE POLICY REVIEW • Vol. 30, No. 2 • 2021 117 POST-COVID-19 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT\",\"PeriodicalId\":34576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maine Policy Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maine Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53558/vhcd4408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maine Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53558/vhcd4408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情严重打击了美国工人,导致大范围裁员,并加速了技能和教育水平有限的工人可获得的工作岗位的长期消失。因此,其影响加剧了收入和机会的不平等。缅因州疫情后经济发展的长期战略需要从现有技能到提供更大就业机会和安全保障的工作建立桥梁。现有研究表明,当收入和安全被视为工人、雇主和纳税人的共同责任时,经济增长可以扩大机会,减少不平等。缅因州可以利用新冠肺炎危机重组体制环境,使公共和私营部门的激励措施保持一致,并实现这些目标。自杀、酗酒和阿片类药物过量死亡的人口分布,在受高薪工作损失最严重的地区,白人男性的死亡人数最多。疫情加深了这些趋势。根据美国疾病控制中心的数据,从2019年5月到2020年5月的12个月期间,因药物过量死亡的人数创下了一年来的最高记录。然而,疫情并不是造成这一增长的唯一因素;2019年服药过量死亡人数也在上升。1尽管如此,新冠肺炎大流行给社会最脆弱的成员带来了更大的经济和心理压力。低工资工人在该国劳动力中占很大比例,截至2020年1月为44%,受疫情影响比高工资工人更严重(Escobari等人,2019)。2裁员在几个方面威胁到他们的安全,包括失去住房和医疗保险(Garfield等人,2020)。即使在疫情之前,大约四分之一的租房者每月总收入的一半以上都在支付租金。截至2021年1月,约20%的租房者拖欠了租金;租房家庭中40%的儿童在食物、住房或两者兼而有之方面都面临困难(CBPP 2021;多尔蒂2021)。大约有3000万人在零售和酒店业工作,几乎占美国总劳动力的20%。这些人中的大多数工作工资水平低于工资中位数(零售业77%,酒店业93%)。这些是最脆弱的工作:工资低,医疗保险覆盖率低,新冠肺炎大流行导致大量失业。从2020年1月到2021年1月,所有工人的失业率从4%上升到6%,金融服务业的失业率仅从2.5%上升到3.4%,但休闲和酒店业的失业失业率从5.9%上升到15.9%(美国劳工统计局2021)。低工资工人最不可能转向在线工作;他们的教育水平往往较低;女性、黑人和西班牙裔的比例过高。因此,新冠肺炎危机对低工资阶层的劳动力造成了多方面的严重打击。低工资工人不仅最有可能被解雇,而且最有可能失去基于就业的医疗保险,或者一开始就缺乏医疗保险。疫情导致的失业意味着近2700万人面临失去医疗保险的风险(Garfield等人,2020)。原则上,这些人中的大多数人可能有资格通过ACA获得医疗补助或市场补贴,但仅限于那些扩大了医疗补助的州。由于收入水平或公民身份的原因,其中一定比例的人将没有资格获得ACA补贴。对于已经失去工作的行业来说,疫情加速了痛苦的过渡,加剧了我们高度不平等和日益加剧的社会和经济后果。经济和社会机会分配的高度不平等导致健康状况出现梯度。研究表明,社会经济地位与健康之间存在直接关系,无论是以人们一个月内经历的健康天数还是以他们的整体健康状况来衡量(Case和Deaton 2020)。所有种族和族裔的健康水平按收入和教育程度有系统地变化。地理不平等也是如此。在全国范围内,疫情的影响因人口群体、行业和地理位置而异(Bahar 2020)。生活在人口稠密地区的人,特别是多人、多代同堂的家庭或聚集的生活设施中的人,感染和更广泛传播感染的风险更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inequality and Workforce Development in Maine in the Post-COVID-19 Environment
The COVID-19 pandemic has stricken American workers deeply, causing widespread layoffs and accelerating the longer-term disappearance of jobs available to workers with limited skills and education. As a result, its impact has exacerbated inequalities of income and opportunity. A long-term strategy for postpandemic economic development in Maine will require building bridges from existing skill sets to jobs offering greater employment opportunity and security. Existing research shows that when income and security are addressed as a shared responsibility on the part of workers, employers, and taxpayers, economic growth can expand opportunity and reduce inequality. Maine can take advantage of the COVID-19 crisis to restructure the institutional environment in ways that will align the incentives of the public and private sectors and will achieve these goals. and demographic distribution of deaths from suicide, alcohol abuse, and opioid overdoses, which have been highest among white males in the regions hardest hit by the loss of decent-paying jobs. The pandemic has deepened these trends. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the 12-month period from May 2019 to May 2020 saw the highest number of deaths from drug overdoses ever recorded in a one-year span. The pandemic, however, was not the only factor in this increase; overdose deaths were rising in 2019 as well.1 Still, the COVID-19 pandemic has burdened the most vulnerable members of society with even heavier economic and psychological stress. Low-wage workers compose a large share of the country’s workforce—44 percent as of January 2020—and have been more severely affected by the pandemic than higherearning workers (Escobari et al. 2019).2 Layoffs threaten their security in several ways, including the loss of housing and of health insurance (Garfield et al. 2020). Even before the pandemic, about a quarter of those living in rental housing were paying more than half their gross monthly income on rent. By January 2021, about 20 percent of all renters had fallen behind on their rent payments; 40 percent of children in households that rented faced difficulty with food, housing, or both (CBPP 2021; Dougherty 2021). Approximately 30 million people work in the retail and hospitality fields, almost 20 percent of the total US labor force. Most of those people work at wage levels below the median wage (77 percent in retail, 93 percent in hospitality). These are the most vulnerable jobs: wages are low, health insurance coverage is sparse, and the COVID-19 pandemic has led to heavy job losses. Whereas from January 2020 to January 2021, the unemployment rate rose from 4 percent to 6 percent for all workers, it only rose from 2.5 percent to 3.4 percent for people working in financial services but from 5.9 percent to 15.9 percent for those in leisure and hospitality (US BLS 2021). Low-wage workers are the least likely to be able to switch to online work; their educational levels tend to be low; and they are disproportionately likely to be female, Black, and Hispanic. The COVID crisis, therefore, is dealing a severe, multifaceted blow to the low-wage segment of the workforce. Low-wage workers are not only the most likely to be laid off, they are also the most likely to lose employment-based health insurance or to lack it in the first place. Loss of employment due to the pandemic means that close to 27 million people are at risk of losing their health insurance (Garfield et al. 2020). In principle, a majority of these individuals may become eligible for Medicaid or for marketplace subsidies through the ACA but only in those states that have expanded Medicaid. And a certain share of them will not be eligible for ACA subsidies due to income level or citizenship status. For industries that were already losing jobs, the pandemic has accelerated a painful transition and intensified the harsh social and economic consequences of our high and rising inequality. High inequality in the distribution of economic and social opportunity produces a gradient in health. Research shows that there is a direct relation between socioeconomic status and health, whether measured as the number of healthy days people experience in a month or in terms of their overall health status (Case and Deaton 2020). Health levels vary systematically for all racial and ethnic categories by income and education. This is true of geographic inequality as well. Across the country, the impact of the pandemic has varied systematically by population group, industry, and geography (Bahar 2020). People living in densely populated areas and particularly in multiperson, multigeneration households or congregant living facilities are at greater risk for becoming infected and spreading infection more widely. People working in jobs requiring a high, prolonged, and intensive level of face-to-face contact, such as assembly line manufacturing, food processing, retail sales, and personal care services, are similarly at higher risk. Groups that have been systematically disadvantaged in access to good housing, health care, education, and job opportunities—particularly minority and immigrant groups—are at greater risk from the illness due to higher underlying rates of hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, poor nutrition, and other chronic conditions (Owen et al. 2020). Where these risk factors linked to geography, industry, and demography overlap, clusters of illness develop and spread at especially high rates. Maine and the Economic Impact of COVID-19 In some respects, the COVID pandemic has affected Maine in the same ways it has affected the rest of the country, while in other respects, the impact on Maine is distinctive. In recent decades, the labor market in Maine has been slightly tighter than that of the country as a whole MAINE POLICY REVIEW • Vol. 30, No. 2 • 2021 117 POST-COVID-19 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信