{"title":"输卵管残端异位妊娠伴急腹症1例","authors":"Cenk Soysal, Ö. Erten","doi":"10.33706/jemcr.1289226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Ectopic pregnancy is a serious condition in which the gestational sac settles outside the uterine cavity. Here we aim to present a case that underwent unilateral salpingectomy due to ectopic pregnancy five years ago and developed an ectopic pregnancy again in the remnant site of the same tube. Although tubal stump ectopic pregnancy is rarely seen in the literature, maternal mortality and morbidity rates are higher than for other tubal ectopic pregnancies. A woman's history of salpingectomy does not rule out ipsilateral recurrent ectopic pregnancy. This is also the first stump tubal ectopic pregnancy case presented from Turkey. \n \n \nIntroduction: Ectopic pregnancy, which occurs in 1-2% of all pregnancies, is a leading cause of first-trimester maternal mortality. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy has increased due to factors such as maternal age, pelvic inflammatory disease, and assisted reproductive technology practices. Ipsilateral ectopic pregnancy in the tubal stump after salpingectomy is extremely rare and can cause diagnostic delay and life-threatening intraabdominal bleeding. \n \nCase Report: A 26-year-old patient with a history of laparoscopic right salpingectomy due to a ruptured right tubal ectopic pregnancy experienced another ectopic pregnancy in the remaining tube. Emergency laparotomy was performed due to hemorrhagic shock and suspected ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The ectopic pregnancy focus was excised, and the patient was discharged after three days without complications. \n \nConclusion: Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in the remaining tubal stump after salpingectomy can have significant clinical consequences. Diagnosis is difficult, so clinicians should be vigilant, especially during early pregnancy in patients with a history of salpingectomy. Partial salpingectomy is not recommended for women of reproductive age, and all possible precautions should be taken to avoid delay in diagnosing tubal stump ectopic pregnancy and preventing its occurrence. \n \nReferences \n1. Saraiya M, Berg CJ, Shulman H, Green CA, Atrash HK. Estimates of the annual number of clinically recognized pregnancies in the United States, 1981-1991. American journal of epidemiology. 1999;149(11):1025-9. \n2. Ko PC, Liang CC, Lo TS, Huang HY. Six cases of tubal stump pregnancy: complication of assisted reproductive technology? Fertility and sterility. 2011;95(7):2432.e1-4. \n3. Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001-2011. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;125(1):70-8. \n4. Sun F, Yang S, Yang Y, Liu X, Xu H. Laparoscopic Management of 42 Cases of Tubal Stump Pregnancy and Postoperative Reproductive Outcomes. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020;27(3):618-24. \n5. Samiei-Sarir B, Diehm C. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in the tubal remnant after salpingectomy. Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;2013:753269. \n6. Sturlese E, Retto G, Palmara V, De Dominici R, Lo Re C, Santoro G. Ectopic pregnancy in tubal remnant stump after ipsilateral adnexectomy for cystic teratoma. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2009;280(6):1015-7. \n7. Takeda A, Manabe S, Mitsui T, Nakamura H. Spontaneous ectopic pregnancy occurring in the isthmic portion of the remnant tube after ipsilateral adnexectomy: report of two cases. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2006;32(2):190-4. \n8. Zuzarte R, Khong CC. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy following ipsilateral partial salpingectomy. Singapore medical journal. 2005;46(9):476-8. \n9. Milingos DS, Black M, Bain C. Three surgically managed ipsilateral spontaneous ectopic pregnancies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;112(2 Pt 2):458-9. \n10. Lau S, Tulandi T. Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertility and sterility. 1999;72(2):207-15. \n11. Peker N, Aydeniz EG, Gündoğan S, Şendağ F. Laparoscopic Management of Heterotopic Istmocornual Pregnancy: A Different Technique. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2017;24(1):8-9. \n12. Chien W-H, Liang C-CJGS. Repeated ectopic pregnancy on the tubal stump after laparoscopic salpingectomy. 2005;2(4):311-2. \n13. Nishida M, Miyamoto Y, Kawano Y, Takebayashi K, Narahara H. A case of successful laparoscopic surgery for tubal stump pregnancy after tubectomy. Clinical medicine insights Case reports. 2015;8:1-4. \n14. Gao MY, Zhu H, Zheng FY. Interstitial Pregnancy after Ipsilateral Salpingectomy: Analysis of 46 Cases and a Literature Review. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020;27(3):613-7. \n15. McCausland A. Endosalpingosis (\"endosalpingoblastosis\") following laparoscopic tubal coagulation as an etiologic factor of ectopic pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982;143(1):12-24.","PeriodicalId":41189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tubal Stump Ectopic Pregnancy with Acute Abdomen: A Rare Case Report\",\"authors\":\"Cenk Soysal, Ö. Erten\",\"doi\":\"10.33706/jemcr.1289226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Ectopic pregnancy is a serious condition in which the gestational sac settles outside the uterine cavity. Here we aim to present a case that underwent unilateral salpingectomy due to ectopic pregnancy five years ago and developed an ectopic pregnancy again in the remnant site of the same tube. Although tubal stump ectopic pregnancy is rarely seen in the literature, maternal mortality and morbidity rates are higher than for other tubal ectopic pregnancies. A woman's history of salpingectomy does not rule out ipsilateral recurrent ectopic pregnancy. This is also the first stump tubal ectopic pregnancy case presented from Turkey. \\n \\n \\nIntroduction: Ectopic pregnancy, which occurs in 1-2% of all pregnancies, is a leading cause of first-trimester maternal mortality. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy has increased due to factors such as maternal age, pelvic inflammatory disease, and assisted reproductive technology practices. Ipsilateral ectopic pregnancy in the tubal stump after salpingectomy is extremely rare and can cause diagnostic delay and life-threatening intraabdominal bleeding. \\n \\nCase Report: A 26-year-old patient with a history of laparoscopic right salpingectomy due to a ruptured right tubal ectopic pregnancy experienced another ectopic pregnancy in the remaining tube. Emergency laparotomy was performed due to hemorrhagic shock and suspected ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The ectopic pregnancy focus was excised, and the patient was discharged after three days without complications. \\n \\nConclusion: Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in the remaining tubal stump after salpingectomy can have significant clinical consequences. Diagnosis is difficult, so clinicians should be vigilant, especially during early pregnancy in patients with a history of salpingectomy. Partial salpingectomy is not recommended for women of reproductive age, and all possible precautions should be taken to avoid delay in diagnosing tubal stump ectopic pregnancy and preventing its occurrence. \\n \\nReferences \\n1. Saraiya M, Berg CJ, Shulman H, Green CA, Atrash HK. Estimates of the annual number of clinically recognized pregnancies in the United States, 1981-1991. American journal of epidemiology. 1999;149(11):1025-9. \\n2. Ko PC, Liang CC, Lo TS, Huang HY. Six cases of tubal stump pregnancy: complication of assisted reproductive technology? Fertility and sterility. 2011;95(7):2432.e1-4. \\n3. Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001-2011. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;125(1):70-8. \\n4. Sun F, Yang S, Yang Y, Liu X, Xu H. Laparoscopic Management of 42 Cases of Tubal Stump Pregnancy and Postoperative Reproductive Outcomes. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020;27(3):618-24. \\n5. Samiei-Sarir B, Diehm C. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in the tubal remnant after salpingectomy. Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;2013:753269. \\n6. Sturlese E, Retto G, Palmara V, De Dominici R, Lo Re C, Santoro G. Ectopic pregnancy in tubal remnant stump after ipsilateral adnexectomy for cystic teratoma. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2009;280(6):1015-7. \\n7. Takeda A, Manabe S, Mitsui T, Nakamura H. Spontaneous ectopic pregnancy occurring in the isthmic portion of the remnant tube after ipsilateral adnexectomy: report of two cases. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2006;32(2):190-4. \\n8. Zuzarte R, Khong CC. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy following ipsilateral partial salpingectomy. Singapore medical journal. 2005;46(9):476-8. \\n9. Milingos DS, Black M, Bain C. Three surgically managed ipsilateral spontaneous ectopic pregnancies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;112(2 Pt 2):458-9. \\n10. Lau S, Tulandi T. Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertility and sterility. 1999;72(2):207-15. \\n11. Peker N, Aydeniz EG, Gündoğan S, Şendağ F. Laparoscopic Management of Heterotopic Istmocornual Pregnancy: A Different Technique. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2017;24(1):8-9. \\n12. Chien W-H, Liang C-CJGS. Repeated ectopic pregnancy on the tubal stump after laparoscopic salpingectomy. 2005;2(4):311-2. \\n13. Nishida M, Miyamoto Y, Kawano Y, Takebayashi K, Narahara H. A case of successful laparoscopic surgery for tubal stump pregnancy after tubectomy. Clinical medicine insights Case reports. 2015;8:1-4. \\n14. Gao MY, Zhu H, Zheng FY. Interstitial Pregnancy after Ipsilateral Salpingectomy: Analysis of 46 Cases and a Literature Review. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020;27(3):613-7. \\n15. McCausland A. Endosalpingosis (\\\"endosalpingoblastosis\\\") following laparoscopic tubal coagulation as an etiologic factor of ectopic pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982;143(1):12-24.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine Case Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33706/jemcr.1289226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33706/jemcr.1289226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:宫外孕是一种严重的妊娠情况,妊娠囊沉淀在子宫腔外。在这里,我们的目的是提出一个病例,五年前,由于异位妊娠接受单侧输卵管切除术,并在同一输卵管的残余部位再次发生异位妊娠。虽然输卵管残端异位妊娠在文献中很少见,但产妇死亡率和发病率高于其他输卵管异位妊娠。妇女输卵管切除术的历史不能排除同侧复发异位妊娠。这也是土耳其首例残端输卵管异位妊娠病例。引言:宫外孕发生在所有妊娠的1-2%,是妊娠早期产妇死亡的主要原因。由于产妇年龄、盆腔炎和辅助生殖技术等因素,异位妊娠的发生率增加。输卵管切除术后同侧异位妊娠在输卵管残端是极其罕见的,可导致诊断延误和危及生命的腹腔出血。病例报告:一位26岁的患者因右侧输卵管异位妊娠破裂而行腹腔镜右侧输卵管切除术,剩余输卵管再次发生异位妊娠。因失血性休克及疑似异位妊娠破裂,急诊剖腹手术。切除异位妊娠病灶,3天后出院,无并发症。结论:输卵管切除术后输卵管残端复发异位妊娠具有重要的临床意义。诊断是困难的,因此临床医生应保持警惕,特别是在怀孕早期的患者有输卵管切除术的历史。育龄妇女不建议行部分输卵管切除术,应采取一切可能的预防措施,避免延误输卵管残端异位妊娠的诊断和预防其发生。引用1。Saraiya M, Berg CJ, Shulman H, Green CA, Atrash HK。1981-1991年美国每年临床确认的怀孕人数的估计。美国流行病学杂志。1999年,149(11):1025 - 9。2. 柯永平,梁春春,罗少生,黄海燕。输卵管残端妊娠6例:辅助生殖技术的并发症?生育和不育。2011, 95 (7): 2432. e1-4。3.Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ。2001-2011年美国辅助生殖技术相关异位妊娠风险分析产科和妇科。2015年,125(1):70 - 8。4. 孙峰,杨松,杨艳,刘霞,徐华。输卵管残端妊娠42例腹腔镜治疗及术后生殖结局[j]。微创妇科杂志。2020; 27(3): 618 - 24。5. 王晓明,王晓明。输卵管切除术后输卵管残端复发性异位妊娠。产科和妇科病例报告。2013; 2013:753269。6. Sturlese E, Retto G, Palmara V, De Dominici R, Lo Re C, Santoro G.胆囊畸胎瘤切除术后输卵管残端异位妊娠。妇产科档案。2009年,280(6):1015 - 7。7. Takeda A, Manabe S, Mitsui T, Nakamura H.同侧附件切除术后残余管的峡部发生自发性异位妊娠:2例报告。妇产科学研究杂志。2006年,32(2):190 - 4。8. 张丽娟,张丽娟。同侧输卵管部分切除术后复发性异位妊娠。新加坡医学杂志。2005; 46(9): 476 - 8。9. Milingos DS, Black M, Bain C.手术治疗同侧自发性异位妊娠3例。产科和妇科。2008;11(2):458- 459。10. 刘少华,杜兰迪。间质性异位妊娠的保守内外科治疗。生育和不育。72(2): 207 - 1999; 15。11. 王晓明,王晓明,王晓明,等。腹腔镜下治疗异位妊娠的临床研究进展。微创妇科杂志。2017; 24(1): 8 - 9。12. 钱文华,梁春杰。腹腔镜输卵管切除术后输卵管残端重复异位妊娠。2(4): 311 - 2005; 2。13. Nishida M, Miyamoto Y, Kawano Y, Takebayashi K, Narahara H.输卵管切除术后输卵管残端妊娠腹腔镜手术成功一例。临床医学见解病例报告。2015; 4节。14. 高美,朱华,郑飞。同侧输卵管切除术后间质性妊娠46例分析并文献复习。微创妇科杂志。2020; 27(3): 613 - 7。15. 腹腔镜输卵管凝固后输卵管内瘘(“输卵管内母细胞病”)是异位妊娠的一个病因因素。美国妇产科杂志。1982年,143(1):12 - 24。
Tubal Stump Ectopic Pregnancy with Acute Abdomen: A Rare Case Report
Abstract: Ectopic pregnancy is a serious condition in which the gestational sac settles outside the uterine cavity. Here we aim to present a case that underwent unilateral salpingectomy due to ectopic pregnancy five years ago and developed an ectopic pregnancy again in the remnant site of the same tube. Although tubal stump ectopic pregnancy is rarely seen in the literature, maternal mortality and morbidity rates are higher than for other tubal ectopic pregnancies. A woman's history of salpingectomy does not rule out ipsilateral recurrent ectopic pregnancy. This is also the first stump tubal ectopic pregnancy case presented from Turkey.
Introduction: Ectopic pregnancy, which occurs in 1-2% of all pregnancies, is a leading cause of first-trimester maternal mortality. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy has increased due to factors such as maternal age, pelvic inflammatory disease, and assisted reproductive technology practices. Ipsilateral ectopic pregnancy in the tubal stump after salpingectomy is extremely rare and can cause diagnostic delay and life-threatening intraabdominal bleeding.
Case Report: A 26-year-old patient with a history of laparoscopic right salpingectomy due to a ruptured right tubal ectopic pregnancy experienced another ectopic pregnancy in the remaining tube. Emergency laparotomy was performed due to hemorrhagic shock and suspected ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The ectopic pregnancy focus was excised, and the patient was discharged after three days without complications.
Conclusion: Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in the remaining tubal stump after salpingectomy can have significant clinical consequences. Diagnosis is difficult, so clinicians should be vigilant, especially during early pregnancy in patients with a history of salpingectomy. Partial salpingectomy is not recommended for women of reproductive age, and all possible precautions should be taken to avoid delay in diagnosing tubal stump ectopic pregnancy and preventing its occurrence.
References
1. Saraiya M, Berg CJ, Shulman H, Green CA, Atrash HK. Estimates of the annual number of clinically recognized pregnancies in the United States, 1981-1991. American journal of epidemiology. 1999;149(11):1025-9.
2. Ko PC, Liang CC, Lo TS, Huang HY. Six cases of tubal stump pregnancy: complication of assisted reproductive technology? Fertility and sterility. 2011;95(7):2432.e1-4.
3. Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001-2011. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2015;125(1):70-8.
4. Sun F, Yang S, Yang Y, Liu X, Xu H. Laparoscopic Management of 42 Cases of Tubal Stump Pregnancy and Postoperative Reproductive Outcomes. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020;27(3):618-24.
5. Samiei-Sarir B, Diehm C. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in the tubal remnant after salpingectomy. Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology. 2013;2013:753269.
6. Sturlese E, Retto G, Palmara V, De Dominici R, Lo Re C, Santoro G. Ectopic pregnancy in tubal remnant stump after ipsilateral adnexectomy for cystic teratoma. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2009;280(6):1015-7.
7. Takeda A, Manabe S, Mitsui T, Nakamura H. Spontaneous ectopic pregnancy occurring in the isthmic portion of the remnant tube after ipsilateral adnexectomy: report of two cases. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2006;32(2):190-4.
8. Zuzarte R, Khong CC. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy following ipsilateral partial salpingectomy. Singapore medical journal. 2005;46(9):476-8.
9. Milingos DS, Black M, Bain C. Three surgically managed ipsilateral spontaneous ectopic pregnancies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008;112(2 Pt 2):458-9.
10. Lau S, Tulandi T. Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertility and sterility. 1999;72(2):207-15.
11. Peker N, Aydeniz EG, Gündoğan S, Şendağ F. Laparoscopic Management of Heterotopic Istmocornual Pregnancy: A Different Technique. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2017;24(1):8-9.
12. Chien W-H, Liang C-CJGS. Repeated ectopic pregnancy on the tubal stump after laparoscopic salpingectomy. 2005;2(4):311-2.
13. Nishida M, Miyamoto Y, Kawano Y, Takebayashi K, Narahara H. A case of successful laparoscopic surgery for tubal stump pregnancy after tubectomy. Clinical medicine insights Case reports. 2015;8:1-4.
14. Gao MY, Zhu H, Zheng FY. Interstitial Pregnancy after Ipsilateral Salpingectomy: Analysis of 46 Cases and a Literature Review. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020;27(3):613-7.
15. McCausland A. Endosalpingosis ("endosalpingoblastosis") following laparoscopic tubal coagulation as an etiologic factor of ectopic pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1982;143(1):12-24.