殖民语法学:16世纪西班牙美洲欧洲字母的多样性和转变

IF 0.2 3区 文学 Q2 HISTORY
A. Laird
{"title":"殖民语法学:16世纪西班牙美洲欧洲字母的多样性和转变","authors":"A. Laird","doi":"10.1080/17597536.2018.1441952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper challenges Walter Mignolo’s influential view that the Renaissance grammarian Nebrija’s theory of writing had a role in justifying Spanish imperialism and that it contributed to the diminution or elimination of native language and memory in the Americas. It will be shown that Isidore of Seville’s comparatively versatile conception of writing, which accommodated pictograms, was far more pervasive in Spain and the New World, fostering parallel advances in written and pictorial communication by indigenous groups, while European letters provided a flexible means of notation for Amerindian languages.","PeriodicalId":41504,"journal":{"name":"Language & History","volume":"61 1","pages":"52 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17597536.2018.1441952","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonial grammatology: the versatility and transformation of European letters in sixteenth-century Spanish America\",\"authors\":\"A. Laird\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17597536.2018.1441952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper challenges Walter Mignolo’s influential view that the Renaissance grammarian Nebrija’s theory of writing had a role in justifying Spanish imperialism and that it contributed to the diminution or elimination of native language and memory in the Americas. It will be shown that Isidore of Seville’s comparatively versatile conception of writing, which accommodated pictograms, was far more pervasive in Spain and the New World, fostering parallel advances in written and pictorial communication by indigenous groups, while European letters provided a flexible means of notation for Amerindian languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language & History\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"52 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17597536.2018.1441952\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language & History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2018.1441952\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17597536.2018.1441952","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文对Walter Mignolo颇具影响力的观点提出了质疑,即文艺复兴语法学家Nebrija的写作理论在证明西班牙帝国主义的合理性方面发挥了作用,并有助于减少或消除美洲的母语和记忆。这将表明,塞维利亚的伊西多尔相对通用的书写概念,包括象形文字,在西班牙和新世界更为普遍,促进了土著群体在书面和图形交流方面的平行进步,而欧洲字母为美洲印第安人语言提供了一种灵活的记法方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colonial grammatology: the versatility and transformation of European letters in sixteenth-century Spanish America
Abstract This paper challenges Walter Mignolo’s influential view that the Renaissance grammarian Nebrija’s theory of writing had a role in justifying Spanish imperialism and that it contributed to the diminution or elimination of native language and memory in the Americas. It will be shown that Isidore of Seville’s comparatively versatile conception of writing, which accommodated pictograms, was far more pervasive in Spain and the New World, fostering parallel advances in written and pictorial communication by indigenous groups, while European letters provided a flexible means of notation for Amerindian languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language & History
Language & History Multiple-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信