一个多学科定制的数字解决方案,用于早期临床试验的数据捕获。

D. Graham, Gemma Wickert, L. Goodwin, J. Clarke, C. Timmins, D. Chang, A. Walker, A. Rees, S. Stringer, Adam Theis, L. Carter, N. Cook, M. Krebs, F. Thistlethwaite, J. Bradford, J. Royle, A. Hughes
{"title":"一个多学科定制的数字解决方案,用于早期临床试验的数据捕获。","authors":"D. Graham, Gemma Wickert, L. Goodwin, J. Clarke, C. Timmins, D. Chang, A. Walker, A. Rees, S. Stringer, Adam Theis, L. Carter, N. Cook, M. Krebs, F. Thistlethwaite, J. Bradford, J. Royle, A. Hughes","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2 Background: Data capture in early phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT) is usually via paper records with manual transcription to the sponsor’s case report form. Capturing real time trial data directly to computer (eSource) may reduce errors and increase completeness and timeliness of data entry. A simulated system pilot took place between Oct 2018 and Jan 2019 at an EPCCT facility to appraise Foundry Health’s eSource system “ClinSpark”. Aims were to assess consistency and effectiveness of creating electronic templates for source data capture and live data collection compliance. Methods: A multidisciplinary focus group (MFG) (2 research nurses, 1 doctor, 3 data managers) was created to collaborate with Foundry Health staff. Specialised features of the eSource system were adapted to handle the complex needs of EPCCT. The pilot incorporated a 5 day boot camp for familiarisation to the digital platform; a conference room test using simulated patient data; construction of a trial template including contingency planning; and a clinic floor test with live simulated patient data collection using digital tablets. The MFG agreed on a 52 item user acceptance test listing ideal features for a data collection tool, with items classified as high, medium or low priority. Results: During the 3 month pilot, templates for 2 EPCCT were planned and created by the MFG. Using eSource, 43 items (83%) of the acceptance test were passed compared with 27 items (52%) for the current (paper) system. For the 30 high-priority items, eSource passed 30 (100%) compared with 22 for the paper system (73%). The paper system was not superior to eSource for any items assessed. Time saving and potential error reduction were noted as additional benefits. Conclusions: This process demonstrates that a multidisciplinary approach can be used to successfully integrate a customised eSource system working with previously untrained staff. Improved performance across pre-specified domains and potential additional benefits were noted. As FDA encourages use of digital solutions in clinical trials, using eSource provides a potential solution for compliant and efficient data capture from protocol assessments at investigator sites and rapid data transfer to sponsors.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multidisciplinary-tailored digital solution to data capture in early phase clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"D. Graham, Gemma Wickert, L. Goodwin, J. Clarke, C. Timmins, D. Chang, A. Walker, A. Rees, S. Stringer, Adam Theis, L. Carter, N. Cook, M. Krebs, F. Thistlethwaite, J. Bradford, J. Royle, A. Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2 Background: Data capture in early phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT) is usually via paper records with manual transcription to the sponsor’s case report form. Capturing real time trial data directly to computer (eSource) may reduce errors and increase completeness and timeliness of data entry. A simulated system pilot took place between Oct 2018 and Jan 2019 at an EPCCT facility to appraise Foundry Health’s eSource system “ClinSpark”. Aims were to assess consistency and effectiveness of creating electronic templates for source data capture and live data collection compliance. Methods: A multidisciplinary focus group (MFG) (2 research nurses, 1 doctor, 3 data managers) was created to collaborate with Foundry Health staff. Specialised features of the eSource system were adapted to handle the complex needs of EPCCT. The pilot incorporated a 5 day boot camp for familiarisation to the digital platform; a conference room test using simulated patient data; construction of a trial template including contingency planning; and a clinic floor test with live simulated patient data collection using digital tablets. The MFG agreed on a 52 item user acceptance test listing ideal features for a data collection tool, with items classified as high, medium or low priority. Results: During the 3 month pilot, templates for 2 EPCCT were planned and created by the MFG. Using eSource, 43 items (83%) of the acceptance test were passed compared with 27 items (52%) for the current (paper) system. For the 30 high-priority items, eSource passed 30 (100%) compared with 22 for the paper system (73%). The paper system was not superior to eSource for any items assessed. Time saving and potential error reduction were noted as additional benefits. Conclusions: This process demonstrates that a multidisciplinary approach can be used to successfully integrate a customised eSource system working with previously untrained staff. Improved performance across pre-specified domains and potential additional benefits were noted. As FDA encourages use of digital solutions in clinical trials, using eSource provides a potential solution for compliant and efficient data capture from protocol assessments at investigator sites and rapid data transfer to sponsors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期癌症临床试验(EPCCT)的数据采集通常是通过纸质记录和人工转录到申办者的病例报告表中。将实时试验数据直接输入计算机(eSource)可以减少错误,提高数据输入的完整性和及时性。2018年10月至2019年1月,在EPCCT工厂进行了模拟系统试点,以评估Foundry Health的资源系统“ClinSpark”。目的是评估为源数据捕获和实时数据收集合规性创建电子模板的一致性和有效性。方法:建立多学科焦点小组(MFG)(2名研究护士,1名医生,3名数据管理人员),与Foundry Health的工作人员合作。eSource系统的专门功能已被调整,以处理EPCCT的复杂需求。该试点项目包括一个为期5天的新手训练营,以熟悉数字平台;使用模拟患者数据的会议室测试;构建包括应急计划在内的试验模板;还有一个诊所地板测试,使用数字平板电脑实时模拟患者数据收集。MFG同意了52项用户验收测试,列出了数据收集工具的理想功能,并将项目分为高、中、低优先级。结果:在3个月的试点期间,MFG计划并创建了2个EPCCT的模板。使用eSource,验收测试通过43项(83%),而当前(纸质)系统的验收测试通过27项(52%)。对于30个高优先级项目,eSource通过了30(100%),而纸质系统通过了22(73%)。在评估的任何项目上,纸质系统并不优于resource。节省时间和减少潜在错误被认为是额外的好处。结论:该过程表明,多学科方法可以用于成功集成定制的资源系统,与以前未受过培训的员工一起工作。改进了跨预先指定的域的性能,并指出了潜在的额外好处。由于FDA鼓励在临床试验中使用数字解决方案,使用eSource提供了一种潜在的解决方案,可以从研究者现场的方案评估中获取合规和高效的数据,并将数据快速传输给赞助商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multidisciplinary-tailored digital solution to data capture in early phase clinical trials.
2 Background: Data capture in early phase cancer clinical trials (EPCCT) is usually via paper records with manual transcription to the sponsor’s case report form. Capturing real time trial data directly to computer (eSource) may reduce errors and increase completeness and timeliness of data entry. A simulated system pilot took place between Oct 2018 and Jan 2019 at an EPCCT facility to appraise Foundry Health’s eSource system “ClinSpark”. Aims were to assess consistency and effectiveness of creating electronic templates for source data capture and live data collection compliance. Methods: A multidisciplinary focus group (MFG) (2 research nurses, 1 doctor, 3 data managers) was created to collaborate with Foundry Health staff. Specialised features of the eSource system were adapted to handle the complex needs of EPCCT. The pilot incorporated a 5 day boot camp for familiarisation to the digital platform; a conference room test using simulated patient data; construction of a trial template including contingency planning; and a clinic floor test with live simulated patient data collection using digital tablets. The MFG agreed on a 52 item user acceptance test listing ideal features for a data collection tool, with items classified as high, medium or low priority. Results: During the 3 month pilot, templates for 2 EPCCT were planned and created by the MFG. Using eSource, 43 items (83%) of the acceptance test were passed compared with 27 items (52%) for the current (paper) system. For the 30 high-priority items, eSource passed 30 (100%) compared with 22 for the paper system (73%). The paper system was not superior to eSource for any items assessed. Time saving and potential error reduction were noted as additional benefits. Conclusions: This process demonstrates that a multidisciplinary approach can be used to successfully integrate a customised eSource system working with previously untrained staff. Improved performance across pre-specified domains and potential additional benefits were noted. As FDA encourages use of digital solutions in clinical trials, using eSource provides a potential solution for compliant and efficient data capture from protocol assessments at investigator sites and rapid data transfer to sponsors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信