{"title":"论歧化的因果推论与限制:以寄养安置为例","authors":"Fred Wulczyn","doi":"10.1086/724657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unwarranted disparities in our foster care system are the result of historical and structural causes. If we hope to correct these disparities by addressing their root causes, we must measure them carefully. In this article, I ask whether our usual measures of Black child/White child placement differences tell us what we need to know to act on those disparities with greater certainty. I specifically examine the limits of disproportionality as a measure. As a way to observe over- and underrepresentation, disproportionality is useful. When the discussion turns to the causes of differential treatment of Black children (or any other children) within the child protection system, there are more useful ways to measure those differences. I demonstrate this point in technical terms, and then I suggest alternative approaches to the measurement problems. Other approaches, I argue, offer a more vivid picture of the problem social workers are trying to solve.","PeriodicalId":47665,"journal":{"name":"Social Service Review","volume":"97 1","pages":"362 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Causal Inference and the Limits of Disproportionality as a Construct: The Case of Foster Care Placement\",\"authors\":\"Fred Wulczyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The unwarranted disparities in our foster care system are the result of historical and structural causes. If we hope to correct these disparities by addressing their root causes, we must measure them carefully. In this article, I ask whether our usual measures of Black child/White child placement differences tell us what we need to know to act on those disparities with greater certainty. I specifically examine the limits of disproportionality as a measure. As a way to observe over- and underrepresentation, disproportionality is useful. When the discussion turns to the causes of differential treatment of Black children (or any other children) within the child protection system, there are more useful ways to measure those differences. I demonstrate this point in technical terms, and then I suggest alternative approaches to the measurement problems. Other approaches, I argue, offer a more vivid picture of the problem social workers are trying to solve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Service Review\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"362 - 397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Service Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724657\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Causal Inference and the Limits of Disproportionality as a Construct: The Case of Foster Care Placement
The unwarranted disparities in our foster care system are the result of historical and structural causes. If we hope to correct these disparities by addressing their root causes, we must measure them carefully. In this article, I ask whether our usual measures of Black child/White child placement differences tell us what we need to know to act on those disparities with greater certainty. I specifically examine the limits of disproportionality as a measure. As a way to observe over- and underrepresentation, disproportionality is useful. When the discussion turns to the causes of differential treatment of Black children (or any other children) within the child protection system, there are more useful ways to measure those differences. I demonstrate this point in technical terms, and then I suggest alternative approaches to the measurement problems. Other approaches, I argue, offer a more vivid picture of the problem social workers are trying to solve.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1927, Social Service Review is devoted to the publication of thought-provoking, original research on social welfare policy, organization, and practice. Articles in the Review analyze issues from the points of view of various disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, view critical problems in context, and carefully consider long-range solutions. The Review features balanced, scholarly contributions from social work and social welfare scholars, as well as from members of the various allied disciplines engaged in research on human behavior, social systems, history, public policy, and social services.