V. Mhatre, P. Chadha, R. Chauhan, K. Talapatra, Abhaya P Kumar
{"title":"两种基于直线加速器的颅内肿瘤放射治疗系统在快速电弧和动态适形电弧治疗中的剂量学比较","authors":"V. Mhatre, P. Chadha, R. Chauhan, K. Talapatra, Abhaya P Kumar","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2020.48162.1775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Present study focused on dosimetric evaluation of Edge and Novalis Tx (NTx) linear accelerator (LA) based radiosurgery system by using rapid arc (RA) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) planning techniques.Materials and Methods: Forty patients with brain lesions of variable sizes (1.1-15.98 cc) were planned for Edge and NTx system by using RA and DCA planning techniques on eclipse treatment planning system version 13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All the plans were evaluated on the basis of paddick conformity index (PCI), homogeneity index (HI) and gradient index (GI). The maximum doses to organs at risk (OAR), V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy for healthy brain tissue were also evaluated for all the plans. The treatment delivery efficiency for both the systems was also evaluated. Results: The mean PCI and GI for both RA and DCA plans were found to be better in Edge as compared to NTx system (PCIEdge,RA=0.77±0.1, PCINTx,RA=0.66±0.11, PCIEdge,DCA= 0.69±0.12, PCINTx,DCA= 0.67±0.12). Significant difference in HI, doses to OAR and V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy brain volume was observed for both the systems with p-value less than 0.05. Reduced treatment time was observed in Edge LA as compared to NTx LA. Conclusion: Edge LA produced clinically better target volume conformity, rapid dose fall-off, reduced reduction in normal brain volume irradiation and treatment time compared to NTx. Thus in the set of patients plan evaluated it was noted that Edge stereotactic suite in more efficacious and diametrically suitable for intracranial radiosurgery.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric Comparison of two linear accelerator based radiosurgery system for Intracranial tumours with Rapid Arc and Dynamic conformal Arc therapy\",\"authors\":\"V. Mhatre, P. Chadha, R. Chauhan, K. Talapatra, Abhaya P Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/IJMP.2020.48162.1775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction : Present study focused on dosimetric evaluation of Edge and Novalis Tx (NTx) linear accelerator (LA) based radiosurgery system by using rapid arc (RA) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) planning techniques.Materials and Methods: Forty patients with brain lesions of variable sizes (1.1-15.98 cc) were planned for Edge and NTx system by using RA and DCA planning techniques on eclipse treatment planning system version 13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All the plans were evaluated on the basis of paddick conformity index (PCI), homogeneity index (HI) and gradient index (GI). The maximum doses to organs at risk (OAR), V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy for healthy brain tissue were also evaluated for all the plans. The treatment delivery efficiency for both the systems was also evaluated. Results: The mean PCI and GI for both RA and DCA plans were found to be better in Edge as compared to NTx system (PCIEdge,RA=0.77±0.1, PCINTx,RA=0.66±0.11, PCIEdge,DCA= 0.69±0.12, PCINTx,DCA= 0.67±0.12). Significant difference in HI, doses to OAR and V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy brain volume was observed for both the systems with p-value less than 0.05. Reduced treatment time was observed in Edge LA as compared to NTx LA. Conclusion: Edge LA produced clinically better target volume conformity, rapid dose fall-off, reduced reduction in normal brain volume irradiation and treatment time compared to NTx. Thus in the set of patients plan evaluated it was noted that Edge stereotactic suite in more efficacious and diametrically suitable for intracranial radiosurgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.48162.1775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.48162.1775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本研究主要利用快速电弧(RA)和动态共形电弧(DCA)规划技术,对Edge和Novalis Tx (NTx)线性加速器(LA)放射手术系统进行剂量学评价。材料和方法:采用eclipse治疗计划系统版本13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA)上的RA和DCA计划技术,对40例不同大小(1.1-15.98 cc)的脑病变患者进行Edge和NTx系统的计划。采用帕迪克一致性指数(PCI)、均匀性指数(HI)和梯度指数(GI)对各方案进行评价。评估了所有方案对健康脑组织的最大危险器官剂量(OAR)、V12Gy、V10Gy和V5Gy。还对两种系统的处理输送效率进行了评估。结果:与NTx系统相比,RA和DCA方案Edge的平均PCI和GI (PCIEdge,RA=0.77±0.1,PCINTx,RA=0.66±0.11,PCIEdge,DCA= 0.69±0.12,PCINTx,DCA= 0.67±0.12)均优于DCA方案。两组HI、OAR剂量及V12Gy、V10Gy、V5Gy脑容量差异均有统计学意义,p值均小于0.05。与NTx LA相比,Edge LA的治疗时间缩短。结论:与NTx相比,Edge LA在临床上具有更好的靶体积一致性,剂量下降快,正常脑容量照射减少和治疗时间缩短。因此,在一组患者计划评估中,我们注意到Edge立体定向套件更有效,更适合颅内放射手术。
Dosimetric Comparison of two linear accelerator based radiosurgery system for Intracranial tumours with Rapid Arc and Dynamic conformal Arc therapy
Introduction : Present study focused on dosimetric evaluation of Edge and Novalis Tx (NTx) linear accelerator (LA) based radiosurgery system by using rapid arc (RA) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) planning techniques.Materials and Methods: Forty patients with brain lesions of variable sizes (1.1-15.98 cc) were planned for Edge and NTx system by using RA and DCA planning techniques on eclipse treatment planning system version 13.6 (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All the plans were evaluated on the basis of paddick conformity index (PCI), homogeneity index (HI) and gradient index (GI). The maximum doses to organs at risk (OAR), V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy for healthy brain tissue were also evaluated for all the plans. The treatment delivery efficiency for both the systems was also evaluated. Results: The mean PCI and GI for both RA and DCA plans were found to be better in Edge as compared to NTx system (PCIEdge,RA=0.77±0.1, PCINTx,RA=0.66±0.11, PCIEdge,DCA= 0.69±0.12, PCINTx,DCA= 0.67±0.12). Significant difference in HI, doses to OAR and V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy brain volume was observed for both the systems with p-value less than 0.05. Reduced treatment time was observed in Edge LA as compared to NTx LA. Conclusion: Edge LA produced clinically better target volume conformity, rapid dose fall-off, reduced reduction in normal brain volume irradiation and treatment time compared to NTx. Thus in the set of patients plan evaluated it was noted that Edge stereotactic suite in more efficacious and diametrically suitable for intracranial radiosurgery.
期刊介绍:
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.