非人性化的特征为基础的措施:适应葡萄牙人口

Lúcia Campos, Ana Louceiro, Tânia Brandão, S. Bernardes
{"title":"非人性化的特征为基础的措施:适应葡萄牙人口","authors":"Lúcia Campos, Ana Louceiro, Tânia Brandão, S. Bernardes","doi":"10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although dehumanization (i.e., the denial of full humanness to others; Haslam, 2006) has been a frequent subject in social psychology, a set of traits designed to evaluate this phenomenon has not been validated to the Portuguese population. The main purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate a set of dehumanization traits proposed by Haslam and colleagues (Haslam & Bain, 2007; Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005), which measure both the denial of uniquely human and human nature traits. A sample of 597 individuals (Mage = 40.83; SD = 11.50) were asked to rate a set of 52 traits on how much they perceived each as a characteristic of human nature and human uniqueness, as well as its desirability. T-tests were conducted to distinguish between low and high rated traits in each dimension, and to construct clusters of traits that differ in each dimension. We successfully provide a measure containing positive traits in both senses of humanness dimensions; however, we were only able to validate a human uniqueness measure with negative valence. Implications of this measure for future research on dehumanization processes are discussed.","PeriodicalId":37656,"journal":{"name":"PSICOLOGIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trait-based Measure of Dehumanization: Adaptation for the Portuguese population\",\"authors\":\"Lúcia Campos, Ana Louceiro, Tânia Brandão, S. Bernardes\",\"doi\":\"10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although dehumanization (i.e., the denial of full humanness to others; Haslam, 2006) has been a frequent subject in social psychology, a set of traits designed to evaluate this phenomenon has not been validated to the Portuguese population. The main purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate a set of dehumanization traits proposed by Haslam and colleagues (Haslam & Bain, 2007; Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005), which measure both the denial of uniquely human and human nature traits. A sample of 597 individuals (Mage = 40.83; SD = 11.50) were asked to rate a set of 52 traits on how much they perceived each as a characteristic of human nature and human uniqueness, as well as its desirability. T-tests were conducted to distinguish between low and high rated traits in each dimension, and to construct clusters of traits that differ in each dimension. We successfully provide a measure containing positive traits in both senses of humanness dimensions; however, we were only able to validate a human uniqueness measure with negative valence. Implications of this measure for future research on dehumanization processes are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSICOLOGIA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSICOLOGIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSICOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17575/psicologia.v34i1.1495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然去人性化(即拒绝给予他人充分的人性;Haslam, 2006)一直是社会心理学中一个常见的主题,旨在评估这一现象的一系列特征尚未在葡萄牙人口中得到验证。本研究的主要目的是翻译、文化适应和验证Haslam及其同事提出的一组非人性化特征(Haslam & Bain, 2007;Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005),它衡量了对人类独特特征和人性特征的否认。597人的样本(Mage = 40.83;SD = 11.50)的人被要求对一组52个特征进行评分,包括他们认为这些特征在多大程度上是人性的特征,是人类的独特性,以及它们的可取性。进行t检验以区分每个维度上的低评级和高评级特征,并构建每个维度上不同的特征集群。我们成功地提供了一个包含人性两个维度的积极特征的衡量标准;然而,我们只能用负效价来验证人类独特性测量。讨论了这一措施对未来非人性化过程研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trait-based Measure of Dehumanization: Adaptation for the Portuguese population
Although dehumanization (i.e., the denial of full humanness to others; Haslam, 2006) has been a frequent subject in social psychology, a set of traits designed to evaluate this phenomenon has not been validated to the Portuguese population. The main purpose of this study was to translate, culturally adapt and validate a set of dehumanization traits proposed by Haslam and colleagues (Haslam & Bain, 2007; Haslam, Bain, Douge, Lee & Bastian, 2005), which measure both the denial of uniquely human and human nature traits. A sample of 597 individuals (Mage = 40.83; SD = 11.50) were asked to rate a set of 52 traits on how much they perceived each as a characteristic of human nature and human uniqueness, as well as its desirability. T-tests were conducted to distinguish between low and high rated traits in each dimension, and to construct clusters of traits that differ in each dimension. We successfully provide a measure containing positive traits in both senses of humanness dimensions; however, we were only able to validate a human uniqueness measure with negative valence. Implications of this measure for future research on dehumanization processes are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PSICOLOGIA
PSICOLOGIA Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The journal PSICOLOGIA publishes original research in the general scope of psychology and behavioral sciences. PSICOLOGIA welcomes empirical research contributions and literature revisions within specific scientific areas of Psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信