新冠肺炎大流行如何改变了输尿管近端结石患者的治疗偏好?

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Urology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-12 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000143
Ali Kaan Yildiz, Ahmet Varan, Hakan Kurt, Omer Gokhan Doluoglu, Berat Cem Ozgur
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行如何改变了输尿管近端结石患者的治疗偏好?","authors":"Ali Kaan Yildiz, Ahmet Varan, Hakan Kurt, Omer Gokhan Doluoglu, Berat Cem Ozgur","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patient decision making remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the pandemic on treatment preferences of patients with proximal ureteral stones.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective data regarding treatment preferences of patients diagnosed with symptomatic proximal ureteral stones between July 2018 and November 2021 at a single center were analyzed. Data from 493 patients were analyzed according to 2 groups, including patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic and those diagnosed during an equivalent period of time before the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preference for conservative treatment increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>p</i> = 0.009). In patients who had previously undergone shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), the preference for SWL decreased and the preference for conservative treatment increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between a preference for conservative treatment during the pandemic and no prior spontaneous stone passage (<i>p</i> = 0.003; odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-4.23), no hydronephrosis (<i>p</i> = 0.035; OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.34-9.49), and a visual analog scale score of 4 or less (<i>p</i> = 0.018; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.15-3.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant increase in the preference for conservative treatment was observed among patients diagnosed during the pandemic, and patients with a history of SWL demonstrated a preference shift from SWL to conservative treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10946634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How has the COVID-19 pandemic changed treatment preferences of patients with proximal ureteral stones?\",\"authors\":\"Ali Kaan Yildiz, Ahmet Varan, Hakan Kurt, Omer Gokhan Doluoglu, Berat Cem Ozgur\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patient decision making remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the pandemic on treatment preferences of patients with proximal ureteral stones.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective data regarding treatment preferences of patients diagnosed with symptomatic proximal ureteral stones between July 2018 and November 2021 at a single center were analyzed. Data from 493 patients were analyzed according to 2 groups, including patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic and those diagnosed during an equivalent period of time before the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preference for conservative treatment increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>p</i> = 0.009). In patients who had previously undergone shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), the preference for SWL decreased and the preference for conservative treatment increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between a preference for conservative treatment during the pandemic and no prior spontaneous stone passage (<i>p</i> = 0.003; odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-4.23), no hydronephrosis (<i>p</i> = 0.035; OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.34-9.49), and a visual analog scale score of 4 or less (<i>p</i> = 0.018; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.15-3.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant increase in the preference for conservative treatment was observed among patients diagnosed during the pandemic, and patients with a history of SWL demonstrated a preference shift from SWL to conservative treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Urology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10946634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000143\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对患者决策的影响仍不确定。本研究旨在调查大流行对输尿管近端结石患者治疗偏好的影响:分析了一个中心在2018年7月至2021年11月期间确诊为症状性近端输尿管结石患者治疗偏好的回顾性数据。来自 493 名患者的数据按两组进行了分析,包括在 COVID-19 大流行期间诊断的患者和在大流行前同等时期诊断的患者:结果:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,更倾向于保守治疗(p = 0.009)。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,先前接受过冲击波碎石(SWL)治疗的患者对 SWL 治疗的偏好下降,而对保守治疗的偏好上升(p = 0.042)。多元逻辑回归分析表明,大流行期间偏好保守治疗与之前没有自发性结石通过之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.003;几率比 [OR],2.48;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.45-4.23)、无肾积水(p = 0.035;OR,3.57;95% CI,1.34-9.49)和视觉模拟评分 4 分或更低(p = 0.018;OR,1.97;95% CI,1.15-3.38):在大流行期间确诊的患者中,倾向于保守治疗的人数明显增加,有SWL病史的患者倾向于从SWL转为保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How has the COVID-19 pandemic changed treatment preferences of patients with proximal ureteral stones?

Background: The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patient decision making remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the pandemic on treatment preferences of patients with proximal ureteral stones.

Materials and methods: Retrospective data regarding treatment preferences of patients diagnosed with symptomatic proximal ureteral stones between July 2018 and November 2021 at a single center were analyzed. Data from 493 patients were analyzed according to 2 groups, including patients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic and those diagnosed during an equivalent period of time before the pandemic.

Results: Preference for conservative treatment increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.009). In patients who had previously undergone shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), the preference for SWL decreased and the preference for conservative treatment increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (p = 0.042). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between a preference for conservative treatment during the pandemic and no prior spontaneous stone passage (p = 0.003; odds ratio [OR], 2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-4.23), no hydronephrosis (p = 0.035; OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 1.34-9.49), and a visual analog scale score of 4 or less (p = 0.018; OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.15-3.38).

Conclusions: A significant increase in the preference for conservative treatment was observed among patients diagnosed during the pandemic, and patients with a history of SWL demonstrated a preference shift from SWL to conservative treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信