氟化物清漆用于预防龋齿的频率-系统回顾和荟萃分析

Deepika V, Roopali M. Sankeshwari, A. Ankola, Vinuta Hampiholi, Sagar Jalihal, A. Choudhury, Apurva Deshpande, A. P. Khot, Ram Surath Kumar
{"title":"氟化物清漆用于预防龋齿的频率-系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Deepika V, Roopali M. Sankeshwari, A. Ankola, Vinuta Hampiholi, Sagar Jalihal, A. Choudhury, Apurva Deshpande, A. P. Khot, Ram Surath Kumar","doi":"10.5530/ijmedph.2022.2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"developing countries, Brazil, despite in evidence-ABSTRACT Background: Oral health is now increasingly regarded as a crucial component of overall health and well-being. Fluoride varnish (FV) is thought to be safe, well-tolerated by children and simple to administer by health professionals for the prevention of dental caries. Since the year 2000, various reviews on the use of fluoride therapy in the prevention of dental caries have been published, but none on the frequency of fluoride varnish application. Hence aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the frequency of fluoride varnish application for prevention of dental caries in children. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of frequency of fluoride varnish application in prevention of dental caries among preschool children. Methodology: Search Strategy: We searched the following databases for Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley, Proquest, Science Direct and Google Scholar which yielded 5657 articles. After screening the titles, 5657 articles were ruled out since they were unrelated to the systematic review’s goals. The remaining 75 articles were searched for duplication using Mendeley Software. Out of 75 articles, 12 articles were found to be duplicates. The remaining 63 articles were screened through abstracts and full text screening as next step. Out of 63 articles, 53 were excluded for various reasons like did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 10 articles were qualitatively analyzed after which they were included in the systematic review and 6 in meta-analysis. Various key words included for screening were “Fluoride Varnish”, Dental Caries”, “Varnish Effectiveness” and “Frequency”. Extraction of the information and assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies using Risk of Bias was done by two authors (DV and RS). Meta-analysis using the random-effects model was conducted for the outcome (dmft score) after application of fluoride varnish. Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to estimate the effect, with 95% confidence intervals. Study Eligibility: All the studies published from January 2005 to April 2020, conducted among children between 0 to 5 years, articles published in English language were included. Studies conducted on animals, a review and a systematic review, participants aged above 5 years were excluded. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Studies were assessed for quality with the help of pre-determined criteria which categorized the studies into high, medium and low quality. Random effect model was used for performing meta-analysis. Results: In total, 10 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. Various fluoride varnish and their frequency were assessed in the prevention of dental caries. All the studies had used Sodium fluoride varnish as a material however 3 studies have specifically mentioned the name, Durashield, Durafluor and Cavityshield respectively. Three studies have mentioned that they have applied fluoride varnish thrice in two weeks while rest of them have applied semiannually i.e.; once in every six months. The pooled overall cumulative mean difference of the dmft score after application of fluoride varnish was 2.67. Conclusion: Intensive application (Thrice in two weeks) of fluoride varnish gave better results when compared with semiannual application (Twice in a year) of fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries in preschool children.","PeriodicalId":90863,"journal":{"name":"International journal of medicine and public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Frequency of Fluoride Varnish Application for Prevention of Dental Caries – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Deepika V, Roopali M. Sankeshwari, A. Ankola, Vinuta Hampiholi, Sagar Jalihal, A. Choudhury, Apurva Deshpande, A. P. Khot, Ram Surath Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/ijmedph.2022.2.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"developing countries, Brazil, despite in evidence-ABSTRACT Background: Oral health is now increasingly regarded as a crucial component of overall health and well-being. Fluoride varnish (FV) is thought to be safe, well-tolerated by children and simple to administer by health professionals for the prevention of dental caries. Since the year 2000, various reviews on the use of fluoride therapy in the prevention of dental caries have been published, but none on the frequency of fluoride varnish application. Hence aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the frequency of fluoride varnish application for prevention of dental caries in children. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of frequency of fluoride varnish application in prevention of dental caries among preschool children. Methodology: Search Strategy: We searched the following databases for Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley, Proquest, Science Direct and Google Scholar which yielded 5657 articles. After screening the titles, 5657 articles were ruled out since they were unrelated to the systematic review’s goals. The remaining 75 articles were searched for duplication using Mendeley Software. Out of 75 articles, 12 articles were found to be duplicates. The remaining 63 articles were screened through abstracts and full text screening as next step. Out of 63 articles, 53 were excluded for various reasons like did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 10 articles were qualitatively analyzed after which they were included in the systematic review and 6 in meta-analysis. Various key words included for screening were “Fluoride Varnish”, Dental Caries”, “Varnish Effectiveness” and “Frequency”. Extraction of the information and assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies using Risk of Bias was done by two authors (DV and RS). Meta-analysis using the random-effects model was conducted for the outcome (dmft score) after application of fluoride varnish. Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to estimate the effect, with 95% confidence intervals. Study Eligibility: All the studies published from January 2005 to April 2020, conducted among children between 0 to 5 years, articles published in English language were included. Studies conducted on animals, a review and a systematic review, participants aged above 5 years were excluded. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Studies were assessed for quality with the help of pre-determined criteria which categorized the studies into high, medium and low quality. Random effect model was used for performing meta-analysis. Results: In total, 10 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. Various fluoride varnish and their frequency were assessed in the prevention of dental caries. All the studies had used Sodium fluoride varnish as a material however 3 studies have specifically mentioned the name, Durashield, Durafluor and Cavityshield respectively. Three studies have mentioned that they have applied fluoride varnish thrice in two weeks while rest of them have applied semiannually i.e.; once in every six months. The pooled overall cumulative mean difference of the dmft score after application of fluoride varnish was 2.67. Conclusion: Intensive application (Thrice in two weeks) of fluoride varnish gave better results when compared with semiannual application (Twice in a year) of fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries in preschool children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of medicine and public health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of medicine and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/ijmedph.2022.2.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of medicine and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/ijmedph.2022.2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:口腔健康现在越来越被认为是整体健康和幸福的重要组成部分。氟化物清漆(FV)被认为是安全的,儿童耐受性良好,卫生专业人员易于使用,可预防龋齿。自2000年以来,有关使用氟化物治疗预防龋齿的各种评论已发表,但没有一篇评论涉及氟化物清漆的使用频率。因此,本系统综述的目的是评估氟化物清漆在预防儿童龋齿中的应用频率。目的:评价氟化物清漆使用频率对学龄前儿童龋齿的预防效果。检索策略:我们在PubMed、Cochrane、Wiley、Proquest、Science Direct和b谷歌Scholar等数据库中检索随机对照试验(RCTs),共检索5657篇。在筛选标题后,5657篇文章被排除,因为它们与系统评价的目标无关。使用Mendeley软件对其余75篇文献进行重复检索。在75篇文章中,有12篇是重复的。其余63篇文章通过摘要筛选和全文筛选作为下一步。63篇文章中,53篇因不符合纳入标准等原因被排除。最后,对10篇文章进行定性分析,纳入系统评价,6篇纳入元分析。筛选的关键词包括“氟化物清漆”、“蛀牙”、“清漆效果”和“使用频率”。利用偏倚风险对纳入研究的信息提取和方法学质量评估由两位作者(DV和RS)完成。使用随机效应模型对应用氟化物清漆后的结果(dmft评分)进行meta分析。采用均值差(MD)或标准化均值差(SMD)估计效果,置信区间为95%。研究资格:纳入2005年1月至2020年4月期间发表的所有研究,研究对象为0 - 5岁儿童,以英语发表的文章。在动物身上进行的研究,一项综述和一项系统综述,排除了5岁以上的参与者。研究评价和综合方法:根据预先确定的标准对研究进行质量评价,将研究分为高、中、低质量。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果:共纳入10篇文献进行定性合成。评估了各种氟化物清漆及其使用频率对龋齿的预防作用。所有的研究都使用了氟化钠清漆作为材料,但有3项研究分别具体提到了Durashield、Durafluor和Cavityshield。三项研究提到,他们在两周内使用了三次氟化物清漆,而其他研究则每半年使用一次,即;每六个月一次。使用含氟清漆后dmft评分的累积平均差值为2.67。结论:强化应用(2周3次)氟化物清漆比半年应用(1年2次)氟化物清漆预防学龄前儿童龋齿效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Frequency of Fluoride Varnish Application for Prevention of Dental Caries – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
developing countries, Brazil, despite in evidence-ABSTRACT Background: Oral health is now increasingly regarded as a crucial component of overall health and well-being. Fluoride varnish (FV) is thought to be safe, well-tolerated by children and simple to administer by health professionals for the prevention of dental caries. Since the year 2000, various reviews on the use of fluoride therapy in the prevention of dental caries have been published, but none on the frequency of fluoride varnish application. Hence aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the frequency of fluoride varnish application for prevention of dental caries in children. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of frequency of fluoride varnish application in prevention of dental caries among preschool children. Methodology: Search Strategy: We searched the following databases for Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Cochrane, Wiley, Proquest, Science Direct and Google Scholar which yielded 5657 articles. After screening the titles, 5657 articles were ruled out since they were unrelated to the systematic review’s goals. The remaining 75 articles were searched for duplication using Mendeley Software. Out of 75 articles, 12 articles were found to be duplicates. The remaining 63 articles were screened through abstracts and full text screening as next step. Out of 63 articles, 53 were excluded for various reasons like did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, 10 articles were qualitatively analyzed after which they were included in the systematic review and 6 in meta-analysis. Various key words included for screening were “Fluoride Varnish”, Dental Caries”, “Varnish Effectiveness” and “Frequency”. Extraction of the information and assessment of the methodological quality of the included studies using Risk of Bias was done by two authors (DV and RS). Meta-analysis using the random-effects model was conducted for the outcome (dmft score) after application of fluoride varnish. Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) were used to estimate the effect, with 95% confidence intervals. Study Eligibility: All the studies published from January 2005 to April 2020, conducted among children between 0 to 5 years, articles published in English language were included. Studies conducted on animals, a review and a systematic review, participants aged above 5 years were excluded. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Studies were assessed for quality with the help of pre-determined criteria which categorized the studies into high, medium and low quality. Random effect model was used for performing meta-analysis. Results: In total, 10 articles were included for qualitative synthesis. Various fluoride varnish and their frequency were assessed in the prevention of dental caries. All the studies had used Sodium fluoride varnish as a material however 3 studies have specifically mentioned the name, Durashield, Durafluor and Cavityshield respectively. Three studies have mentioned that they have applied fluoride varnish thrice in two weeks while rest of them have applied semiannually i.e.; once in every six months. The pooled overall cumulative mean difference of the dmft score after application of fluoride varnish was 2.67. Conclusion: Intensive application (Thrice in two weeks) of fluoride varnish gave better results when compared with semiannual application (Twice in a year) of fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries in preschool children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信