不要把他们放在同一个篮子里:从美国参与的角度看中国和俄罗斯

IF 0.4 Q3 Social Sciences
P. Hlavacek
{"title":"不要把他们放在同一个篮子里:从美国参与的角度看中国和俄罗斯","authors":"P. Hlavacek","doi":"10.32422/mv.1541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has applied a policy of engagement towards China and Russia. During the administration of Barack Obama, this approach led to two different outcomes: while the American relations with Russia reached their lowest point and international sanctions were imposed on Russia during his term, in the case of China, the US relations with it were better than prior to the election of Barack Obama. The goal of this article is to determine why this occurred. I come to the conclusion that China and Russia adopted different forms of engagement in regard to the US. While China has been working on its power and prestige in close cooperation with the United States, and therefore it should not be labeled as a “revisionist power”, Russia has tried to re-establish its power potential and international prestige in opposition to the United States. Therefore Russia can be called a “revisionist power”.","PeriodicalId":39183,"journal":{"name":"Mezinarodni Vztahy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Not Throw Them in the Same Basket: China and Russia Through the Perspective of US Engagement\",\"authors\":\"P. Hlavacek\",\"doi\":\"10.32422/mv.1541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has applied a policy of engagement towards China and Russia. During the administration of Barack Obama, this approach led to two different outcomes: while the American relations with Russia reached their lowest point and international sanctions were imposed on Russia during his term, in the case of China, the US relations with it were better than prior to the election of Barack Obama. The goal of this article is to determine why this occurred. I come to the conclusion that China and Russia adopted different forms of engagement in regard to the US. While China has been working on its power and prestige in close cooperation with the United States, and therefore it should not be labeled as a “revisionist power”, Russia has tried to re-establish its power potential and international prestige in opposition to the United States. Therefore Russia can be called a “revisionist power”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mezinarodni Vztahy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mezinarodni Vztahy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32422/mv.1541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mezinarodni Vztahy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32422/mv.1541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自冷战结束以来,美国一直对中国和俄罗斯实行接触政策。在奥巴马执政期间,这种做法导致了两种不同的结果:在奥巴马任期内,美国与俄罗斯的关系跌至最低点,国际社会对俄罗斯实施制裁,而在中国方面,美国与中国的关系比奥巴马当选前要好。本文的目的是确定发生这种情况的原因。我的结论是,中国和俄罗斯对美国采取了不同的接触方式。中国一直在与美国密切合作,努力提升自己的实力和声望,因此不应该被贴上“修正主义大国”的标签,而俄罗斯则试图重建自己的实力潜力和国际声望,与美国对立。因此,俄罗斯可以被称为“修正主义大国”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Not Throw Them in the Same Basket: China and Russia Through the Perspective of US Engagement
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has applied a policy of engagement towards China and Russia. During the administration of Barack Obama, this approach led to two different outcomes: while the American relations with Russia reached their lowest point and international sanctions were imposed on Russia during his term, in the case of China, the US relations with it were better than prior to the election of Barack Obama. The goal of this article is to determine why this occurred. I come to the conclusion that China and Russia adopted different forms of engagement in regard to the US. While China has been working on its power and prestige in close cooperation with the United States, and therefore it should not be labeled as a “revisionist power”, Russia has tried to re-establish its power potential and international prestige in opposition to the United States. Therefore Russia can be called a “revisionist power”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mezinarodni Vztahy
Mezinarodni Vztahy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信