超越编纂常识:从历史制度主义到批判制度主义

Q3 Social Sciences
Dennis Pilon
{"title":"超越编纂常识:从历史制度主义到批判制度主义","authors":"Dennis Pilon","doi":"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Critics argue that historical institutionalism (HI) ignores the social dimension of its research, particularly as concerns social inequality. This article tracks the problem back to the field’s implicit reliance on positivist empiricism and a narrow understanding of what constitutes a theory and argues that these unacknowledged commitments effectively block HI from addressing the issue. Instead, this article argues for critical institutionalism, drawing from nonpositivist approaches to social science research and critical social theory, and provides concrete examples of how this might be pursued.","PeriodicalId":39831,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Political Economy","volume":"102 1","pages":"101 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond codifying common sense: from an historical to critical institutionalism\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Pilon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Critics argue that historical institutionalism (HI) ignores the social dimension of its research, particularly as concerns social inequality. This article tracks the problem back to the field’s implicit reliance on positivist empiricism and a narrow understanding of what constitutes a theory and argues that these unacknowledged commitments effectively block HI from addressing the issue. Instead, this article argues for critical institutionalism, drawing from nonpositivist approaches to social science research and critical social theory, and provides concrete examples of how this might be pursued.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2021.1949787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要批评者认为,历史制度主义忽视了其研究的社会层面,尤其是在关注社会不平等方面。本文将这个问题追溯到该领域对实证主义经验主义的隐含依赖和对什么构成理论的狭隘理解,并认为这些未被承认的承诺有效地阻碍了HI解决这个问题。相反,本文借鉴社会科学研究和批判性社会理论的非实证主义方法,为批判性制度主义辩护,并提供了如何实现这一点的具体例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond codifying common sense: from an historical to critical institutionalism
Abstract Critics argue that historical institutionalism (HI) ignores the social dimension of its research, particularly as concerns social inequality. This article tracks the problem back to the field’s implicit reliance on positivist empiricism and a narrow understanding of what constitutes a theory and argues that these unacknowledged commitments effectively block HI from addressing the issue. Instead, this article argues for critical institutionalism, drawing from nonpositivist approaches to social science research and critical social theory, and provides concrete examples of how this might be pursued.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Political Economy
Studies in Political Economy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Studies in Political Economy is an interdisciplinary journal committed to the publication of original work in the various traditions of socialist political economy. Researchers and analysts within these traditions seek to understand how political, economic and cultural processes and struggles interact to shape and reshape the conditions of people"s lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信