错误的广告:供应商的可原谅性问题还是消费者的可识别性问题?

Q4 Social Sciences
Iñigo de la Maza-Gazmuri, Patricia López-Díaz
{"title":"错误的广告:供应商的可原谅性问题还是消费者的可识别性问题?","authors":"Iñigo de la Maza-Gazmuri, Patricia López-Díaz","doi":"10.4067/s0718-80722021000100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this work is to address what some of the judgments of our courts have come to call erroneous advertising in order to determinate whether, in fact, we are facing a new advertising category or, on the contrary, it constitutes the negative face of advertising misleading. The method used has been to review the judgments of the Santiago Courts of Appeal that have alluded to it between the years 2015 to 2018, critically analyzing them, based on excusability of the supplier’s error and its recognoscibility by the consumer, nothing that we are not faced with a kind of advertising other than misleading and that the use of it is unnecessary, a matter that affects The scope of Law 19.496 on the Protection of Consumer Rights, since there being a supplier error, recognized by the supplier there is no trust to protect, so civil law must to returned to.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LA PUBLICIDAD ERRÓNEA: ¿UN PROBLEMA DE EXCUSABILIDAD DEL PROVEEDOR O DE RECOGNOSCIBILIDAD DEL CONSUMIDOR?\",\"authors\":\"Iñigo de la Maza-Gazmuri, Patricia López-Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-80722021000100009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this work is to address what some of the judgments of our courts have come to call erroneous advertising in order to determinate whether, in fact, we are facing a new advertising category or, on the contrary, it constitutes the negative face of advertising misleading. The method used has been to review the judgments of the Santiago Courts of Appeal that have alluded to it between the years 2015 to 2018, critically analyzing them, based on excusability of the supplier’s error and its recognoscibility by the consumer, nothing that we are not faced with a kind of advertising other than misleading and that the use of it is unnecessary, a matter that affects The scope of Law 19.496 on the Protection of Consumer Rights, since there being a supplier error, recognized by the supplier there is no trust to protect, so civil law must to returned to.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-80722021000100009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-80722021000100009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的目的是解决我们法院的一些判决所称的错误广告,以确定事实上,我们是否面临着一个新的广告类别,或者相反,它构成了广告误导的负面形象。所使用的方法是审查圣地亚哥上诉法院在2015年至2018年期间提及的判决,并根据供应商错误的可原谅性和消费者的可识别性对其进行批判性分析,除了误导之外,我们没有遇到任何其他广告,也没有必要使用它,一个影响到1996年《消费者权益保护法》第19.496条范围的事项,由于存在供应商错误,被认定为供应商没有信任可以保护,因此必须回归民法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LA PUBLICIDAD ERRÓNEA: ¿UN PROBLEMA DE EXCUSABILIDAD DEL PROVEEDOR O DE RECOGNOSCIBILIDAD DEL CONSUMIDOR?
The purpose of this work is to address what some of the judgments of our courts have come to call erroneous advertising in order to determinate whether, in fact, we are facing a new advertising category or, on the contrary, it constitutes the negative face of advertising misleading. The method used has been to review the judgments of the Santiago Courts of Appeal that have alluded to it between the years 2015 to 2018, critically analyzing them, based on excusability of the supplier’s error and its recognoscibility by the consumer, nothing that we are not faced with a kind of advertising other than misleading and that the use of it is unnecessary, a matter that affects The scope of Law 19.496 on the Protection of Consumer Rights, since there being a supplier error, recognized by the supplier there is no trust to protect, so civil law must to returned to.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信