{"title":"治疗巨细胞动脉炎的现有和创新治疗策略","authors":"A. Sebastian, A. Tomelleri, B. Dasgupta","doi":"10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Glucocorticoids represent a highly effective treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA); however, steroid-dependency frequently hinders an adequate dose reduction. This has led to a flourishing interest in new therapeutic strategies. Areas covered: An analysis of the treatments for GCA was conducted and structured in four sections: summary data supporting the use of glucocorticoids; uncertainty regarding the use of antithrombotic agents are discussed; studies on different conventional steroid-sparing agents are reported; controlled trials with already available biologic agents and the design of those still ongoing are presented. The basis for this review is a literature search on PubMed of studies published until 31st December 2020 on GCA treatment. Expert opinion: New GCA patients should be stratified, and therapeutic management should be tailored accordingly. High-risk patients should be treated early with steroid-sparing agents. However, current evidence only supports the use of tocilizumab, with conflicting data on methotrexate. Results of controlled trials evaluating other agents, like mavrilimumab, will be released soon; hopefully, this will lead to their inclusion as alternatives to tocilizumab. Even if biologic drugs seem highly effective, their use could be limited by high costs; hence, clinical research should not forget about less expensive conventional agents, such as leflunomide.","PeriodicalId":12118,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","volume":"9 1","pages":"161 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current and innovative therapeutic strategies for the treatment of giant cell arteritis\",\"authors\":\"A. Sebastian, A. Tomelleri, B. Dasgupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction: Glucocorticoids represent a highly effective treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA); however, steroid-dependency frequently hinders an adequate dose reduction. This has led to a flourishing interest in new therapeutic strategies. Areas covered: An analysis of the treatments for GCA was conducted and structured in four sections: summary data supporting the use of glucocorticoids; uncertainty regarding the use of antithrombotic agents are discussed; studies on different conventional steroid-sparing agents are reported; controlled trials with already available biologic agents and the design of those still ongoing are presented. The basis for this review is a literature search on PubMed of studies published until 31st December 2020 on GCA treatment. Expert opinion: New GCA patients should be stratified, and therapeutic management should be tailored accordingly. High-risk patients should be treated early with steroid-sparing agents. However, current evidence only supports the use of tocilizumab, with conflicting data on methotrexate. Results of controlled trials evaluating other agents, like mavrilimumab, will be released soon; hopefully, this will lead to their inclusion as alternatives to tocilizumab. Even if biologic drugs seem highly effective, their use could be limited by high costs; hence, clinical research should not forget about less expensive conventional agents, such as leflunomide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"161 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678707.2021.1932458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current and innovative therapeutic strategies for the treatment of giant cell arteritis
ABSTRACT Introduction: Glucocorticoids represent a highly effective treatment for giant cell arteritis (GCA); however, steroid-dependency frequently hinders an adequate dose reduction. This has led to a flourishing interest in new therapeutic strategies. Areas covered: An analysis of the treatments for GCA was conducted and structured in four sections: summary data supporting the use of glucocorticoids; uncertainty regarding the use of antithrombotic agents are discussed; studies on different conventional steroid-sparing agents are reported; controlled trials with already available biologic agents and the design of those still ongoing are presented. The basis for this review is a literature search on PubMed of studies published until 31st December 2020 on GCA treatment. Expert opinion: New GCA patients should be stratified, and therapeutic management should be tailored accordingly. High-risk patients should be treated early with steroid-sparing agents. However, current evidence only supports the use of tocilizumab, with conflicting data on methotrexate. Results of controlled trials evaluating other agents, like mavrilimumab, will be released soon; hopefully, this will lead to their inclusion as alternatives to tocilizumab. Even if biologic drugs seem highly effective, their use could be limited by high costs; hence, clinical research should not forget about less expensive conventional agents, such as leflunomide.