战争与和平的唯一代表:斯里兰卡泰米尔伊拉姆猛虎解放组织的案例

IF 1.2 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
S. I. Keethaponcalan
{"title":"战争与和平的唯一代表:斯里兰卡泰米尔伊拉姆猛虎解放组织的案例","authors":"S. I. Keethaponcalan","doi":"10.1080/13698249.2021.1903774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper examines the hitherto unexplored subject of nonstate rebels seeking the status of sole representatives. Why do nonstate armed groups seek the status of sole representatives?, What strategies do they employ to achieve the status of sole representatives?, Is the status merely symbolic, or does it fetch tangible benefits? These research questions are explored by treating Sri Lanka’s LTTE as a case study. Primary and secondary data formed the basis of the analysis. The LTTE used three strategies to achieve a hegemonic disposition within the Tamil community. They are: (1) elimination of rival groups, (2) incorporation of some groups, and (3) battlefield efficacy. The rebels used the claim of sole representation to ensure bilateral talks with the government, get the ban on it lifted, and control the proposed interim administrative structure. The strategy worked to a certain extent, but at least partially contributed to its downfall in 2009.","PeriodicalId":51785,"journal":{"name":"Civil Wars","volume":"24 1","pages":"6 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13698249.2021.1903774","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sole Representatives in War and Peace: The Case of Sri Lanka’s Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam\",\"authors\":\"S. I. Keethaponcalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698249.2021.1903774\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper examines the hitherto unexplored subject of nonstate rebels seeking the status of sole representatives. Why do nonstate armed groups seek the status of sole representatives?, What strategies do they employ to achieve the status of sole representatives?, Is the status merely symbolic, or does it fetch tangible benefits? These research questions are explored by treating Sri Lanka’s LTTE as a case study. Primary and secondary data formed the basis of the analysis. The LTTE used three strategies to achieve a hegemonic disposition within the Tamil community. They are: (1) elimination of rival groups, (2) incorporation of some groups, and (3) battlefield efficacy. The rebels used the claim of sole representation to ensure bilateral talks with the government, get the ban on it lifted, and control the proposed interim administrative structure. The strategy worked to a certain extent, but at least partially contributed to its downfall in 2009.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Wars\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"6 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13698249.2021.1903774\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Wars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2021.1903774\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2021.1903774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了迄今为止尚未探索的非国家反叛分子寻求唯一代表地位的问题。为什么非国家武装团体寻求唯一代表的地位?,他们采用了哪些策略来获得唯一代表的地位?,这种地位仅仅是象征性的,还是带来了实实在在的好处?通过对斯里兰卡猛虎组织的个案研究,探讨了这些研究问题。主要和次要数据构成了分析的基础。猛虎组织使用了三种策略在泰米尔社区内部实现霸权倾向。它们是:(1)消灭敌对团体,(2)合并一些团体,以及(3)战场效能。叛军利用唯一代表权来确保与政府的双边谈判,解除对政府的禁令,并控制拟议的临时行政结构。这一战略在一定程度上起到了作用,但至少部分导致了其在2009年的垮台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sole Representatives in War and Peace: The Case of Sri Lanka’s Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
ABSTRACT This paper examines the hitherto unexplored subject of nonstate rebels seeking the status of sole representatives. Why do nonstate armed groups seek the status of sole representatives?, What strategies do they employ to achieve the status of sole representatives?, Is the status merely symbolic, or does it fetch tangible benefits? These research questions are explored by treating Sri Lanka’s LTTE as a case study. Primary and secondary data formed the basis of the analysis. The LTTE used three strategies to achieve a hegemonic disposition within the Tamil community. They are: (1) elimination of rival groups, (2) incorporation of some groups, and (3) battlefield efficacy. The rebels used the claim of sole representation to ensure bilateral talks with the government, get the ban on it lifted, and control the proposed interim administrative structure. The strategy worked to a certain extent, but at least partially contributed to its downfall in 2009.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Wars
Civil Wars POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信