让他们了解我们的想法

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
D. Pope
{"title":"让他们了解我们的想法","authors":"D. Pope","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2021.1924473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zoe Sherman’s Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention gives historical substance to the theory that advertisers are buying the commodity of audience attention. Attention, she maintains, was commodified as the American advertising business assumed its modern institutional form during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. Her study is notable for extending beyond print media to outdoor and direct-mail advertising. Based in trade publications and other primary sources, the study notes the complicated institutional relations among advertisers, agents, and media. These relations usually favor big-budget advertisers, but attention is a slippery commodity, difficult to measure or control. Sherman uses Karl Polanyi’s concept of fictitious commodities to explain attention as a phenomenon that is inherently ill-suited for full commodification.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"438 - 443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Giving Them a Piece of Our Mind\",\"authors\":\"D. Pope\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2021.1924473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Zoe Sherman’s Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention gives historical substance to the theory that advertisers are buying the commodity of audience attention. Attention, she maintains, was commodified as the American advertising business assumed its modern institutional form during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. Her study is notable for extending beyond print media to outdoor and direct-mail advertising. Based in trade publications and other primary sources, the study notes the complicated institutional relations among advertisers, agents, and media. These relations usually favor big-budget advertisers, but attention is a slippery commodity, difficult to measure or control. Sherman uses Karl Polanyi’s concept of fictitious commodities to explain attention as a phenomenon that is inherently ill-suited for full commodification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"438 - 443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1924473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1924473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Zoe Sherman的《现代广告与受众注意力市场》为广告主购买受众注意力商品的理论提供了历史依据。她坚持认为,随着美国广告业在镀金时代(Gilded Age)和进步时代(Progressive Era)形成现代制度形式,注意力被商品化了。她的研究从平面媒体扩展到户外和直邮广告,值得注意。基于贸易出版物和其他主要来源,该研究指出了广告商、代理商和媒体之间复杂的制度关系。这种关系通常有利于大预算的广告商,但注意力是一种难以捉摸的商品,难以衡量或控制。谢尔曼使用卡尔·波兰尼(Karl Polanyi)的虚拟商品概念来解释注意力是一种本质上不适合完全商品化的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Giving Them a Piece of Our Mind
Zoe Sherman’s Modern Advertising and the Market for Audience Attention gives historical substance to the theory that advertisers are buying the commodity of audience attention. Attention, she maintains, was commodified as the American advertising business assumed its modern institutional form during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. Her study is notable for extending beyond print media to outdoor and direct-mail advertising. Based in trade publications and other primary sources, the study notes the complicated institutional relations among advertisers, agents, and media. These relations usually favor big-budget advertisers, but attention is a slippery commodity, difficult to measure or control. Sherman uses Karl Polanyi’s concept of fictitious commodities to explain attention as a phenomenon that is inherently ill-suited for full commodification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信