项目融资银行贷款违约概率评估与巴塞尔监管:寻找新范式

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Vikas Srivastava, Surya Dashottar
{"title":"项目融资银行贷款违约概率评估与巴塞尔监管:寻找新范式","authors":"Vikas Srivastava, Surya Dashottar","doi":"10.3905/jsf.2019.1.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Syndicated loan data from India suggest that despite the pressure on margins and volumes, available “bankable” deals in infrastructure are still strongly contested by commercial lenders. With the implementation of Ind AS accounting norms (IFRS) for commercial banks, the expected credit loss–based provisions have to be set by the bank based on internally estimated probability of default (PD) for different loan portfolios. This change may lead to heavier risk-weighted capital requirements for banks, thus impacting the project finance business. Basel III norms and subsequent discussion papers propose a revised standardized approach doing away with internal modeling approaches and introduction of standardized output floors for specialized lending, including project finance. In this light, the authors present a cash flow simulation model to address the issue of PD estimation by simulating key risk factors. This method may be useful as each project and each sector is unique and so are the risks associated with it. Thus, the authors argue that the use of a simulation model will result in better assessment and monitoring of credit risk than conventional assessment methods, leading to lower default rates and therefore lower capital charge. The authors then suggest some new rules of engagement for project finance lenders to stay relevant in the changing regulatory scenario. TOPICS: Simulations, project finance, credit risk management Key Findings • Probability of default estimation and subsequent impact on credit risk capital is important for project finance lenders in India especially after emerging Basel III reforms and subsequent discussion papers on credit risk capital. (Informally called as Basel IV) • The authors suggest a cash flow simulation model developed using risk parameters “specific” to each project. The application of the model is shown on a road project and it calculates cumulative default risk probability of the project. • The article argues that this model will result in better assessment and monitoring of credit risk. Authors also suggest new rules for engagement for the project finance lenders in the emerging regulatory scenario.","PeriodicalId":51968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structured Finance","volume":"25 1","pages":"41 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Default Probability Assessment for Project Finance Bank Loans and Basel Regulations: Searching for a New Paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Vikas Srivastava, Surya Dashottar\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jsf.2019.1.088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Syndicated loan data from India suggest that despite the pressure on margins and volumes, available “bankable” deals in infrastructure are still strongly contested by commercial lenders. With the implementation of Ind AS accounting norms (IFRS) for commercial banks, the expected credit loss–based provisions have to be set by the bank based on internally estimated probability of default (PD) for different loan portfolios. This change may lead to heavier risk-weighted capital requirements for banks, thus impacting the project finance business. Basel III norms and subsequent discussion papers propose a revised standardized approach doing away with internal modeling approaches and introduction of standardized output floors for specialized lending, including project finance. In this light, the authors present a cash flow simulation model to address the issue of PD estimation by simulating key risk factors. This method may be useful as each project and each sector is unique and so are the risks associated with it. Thus, the authors argue that the use of a simulation model will result in better assessment and monitoring of credit risk than conventional assessment methods, leading to lower default rates and therefore lower capital charge. The authors then suggest some new rules of engagement for project finance lenders to stay relevant in the changing regulatory scenario. TOPICS: Simulations, project finance, credit risk management Key Findings • Probability of default estimation and subsequent impact on credit risk capital is important for project finance lenders in India especially after emerging Basel III reforms and subsequent discussion papers on credit risk capital. (Informally called as Basel IV) • The authors suggest a cash flow simulation model developed using risk parameters “specific” to each project. The application of the model is shown on a road project and it calculates cumulative default risk probability of the project. • The article argues that this model will result in better assessment and monitoring of credit risk. Authors also suggest new rules for engagement for the project finance lenders in the emerging regulatory scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structured Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2019.1.088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structured Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jsf.2019.1.088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

来自印度的银团贷款数据表明,尽管利润率和贷款量面临压力,但商业贷款机构仍对基础设施领域的可用“可银行化”交易提出强烈质疑。随着商业银行Ind AS会计准则(IFRS)的实施,银行必须根据不同贷款组合的内部估计违约概率(PD)来设定基于预期信贷损失的准备金。这一变化可能会导致银行的风险加权资本要求更高,从而影响项目融资业务。巴塞尔协议III规范和随后的讨论文件提出了一种修订的标准化方法,取消了内部建模方法,并引入了包括项目融资在内的专业贷款的标准化产出下限。有鉴于此,作者提出了一个现金流模拟模型,通过模拟关键风险因素来解决PD估计问题。这种方法可能很有用,因为每个项目和每个部门都是独一无二的,与之相关的风险也是独一无二的。因此,作者认为,使用模拟模型将比传统评估方法更好地评估和监测信贷风险,从而降低违约率,从而降低资本费用。然后,作者提出了一些新的项目融资贷款人参与规则,以在不断变化的监管环境中保持相关性。主题:模拟、项目融资、信贷风险管理关键发现•违约估计的概率及其对信贷风险资本的后续影响对印度的项目融资贷款人来说很重要,尤其是在新巴塞尔协议III改革和随后关于信贷风险资本的讨论文件之后。(非正式地称为巴塞尔协议IV)•作者建议使用每个项目“特定”的风险参数开发现金流模拟模型。该模型的应用显示在一个道路项目上,它计算了该项目的累积违约风险概率。•文章认为,这种模式将导致更好的信用风险评估和监测。作者还提出了在新兴监管情景下项目融资贷款人参与的新规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Default Probability Assessment for Project Finance Bank Loans and Basel Regulations: Searching for a New Paradigm
Syndicated loan data from India suggest that despite the pressure on margins and volumes, available “bankable” deals in infrastructure are still strongly contested by commercial lenders. With the implementation of Ind AS accounting norms (IFRS) for commercial banks, the expected credit loss–based provisions have to be set by the bank based on internally estimated probability of default (PD) for different loan portfolios. This change may lead to heavier risk-weighted capital requirements for banks, thus impacting the project finance business. Basel III norms and subsequent discussion papers propose a revised standardized approach doing away with internal modeling approaches and introduction of standardized output floors for specialized lending, including project finance. In this light, the authors present a cash flow simulation model to address the issue of PD estimation by simulating key risk factors. This method may be useful as each project and each sector is unique and so are the risks associated with it. Thus, the authors argue that the use of a simulation model will result in better assessment and monitoring of credit risk than conventional assessment methods, leading to lower default rates and therefore lower capital charge. The authors then suggest some new rules of engagement for project finance lenders to stay relevant in the changing regulatory scenario. TOPICS: Simulations, project finance, credit risk management Key Findings • Probability of default estimation and subsequent impact on credit risk capital is important for project finance lenders in India especially after emerging Basel III reforms and subsequent discussion papers on credit risk capital. (Informally called as Basel IV) • The authors suggest a cash flow simulation model developed using risk parameters “specific” to each project. The application of the model is shown on a road project and it calculates cumulative default risk probability of the project. • The article argues that this model will result in better assessment and monitoring of credit risk. Authors also suggest new rules for engagement for the project finance lenders in the emerging regulatory scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structured Finance
Journal of Structured Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structured Finance (JSF) is the only international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to empirical analysis and practical guidance on structured finance instruments, techniques, and strategies. JSF covers a wide range of topics including credit derivatives and synthetic securitization, secondary trading in the CDO market, securitization in emerging markets, trends in major consumer loan categories, accounting, regulatory, and tax issues in the structured finance industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信