确保新数据生态系统的质量:注意数据和统计数据之间的差距!

Q3 Decision Sciences
Matthias Reister
{"title":"确保新数据生态系统的质量:注意数据和统计数据之间的差距!","authors":"Matthias Reister","doi":"10.3233/sji-230008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on recent work to develop the United Nations National Quality Assurance Frameworks Manual for Official Statistics to respond to the new data ecosystem, this paper addresses three important questions now facing the statistical community: (1) How can official statistics assure the quality of data from administrative and other sources? (2) Can the quality assurance framework for official statistics be applied to data as opposed to statistics? (3) What other implications does the difference between data and statistics have for the role of official statistics in the new data ecosystem? The paper argues that statistical offices should strongly support the establishment of national data stewards but should not take on such a role themselves. Mixing responsibilities for data and official statistics risks both undermining official statistics and not doing justice to the need to develop data as an asset in a responsible way.","PeriodicalId":55877,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assuring quality in the new data ecosystem: Mind the gap between data and statistics!\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Reister\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/sji-230008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on recent work to develop the United Nations National Quality Assurance Frameworks Manual for Official Statistics to respond to the new data ecosystem, this paper addresses three important questions now facing the statistical community: (1) How can official statistics assure the quality of data from administrative and other sources? (2) Can the quality assurance framework for official statistics be applied to data as opposed to statistics? (3) What other implications does the difference between data and statistics have for the role of official statistics in the new data ecosystem? The paper argues that statistical offices should strongly support the establishment of national data stewards but should not take on such a role themselves. Mixing responsibilities for data and official statistics risks both undermining official statistics and not doing justice to the need to develop data as an asset in a responsible way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Journal of the IAOS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Journal of the IAOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-230008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Journal of the IAOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/sji-230008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据最近制定《联合国官方统计国家质量保证框架手册》以应对新的数据生态系统的工作,本文讨论了统计界目前面临的三个重要问题:(1)官方统计如何确保行政和其他来源的数据质量?(2) 官方统计的质量保证框架能否适用于数据而不是统计?(3) 数据和统计之间的差异对官方统计在新的数据生态系统中的作用还有什么其他影响?该文件认为,统计局应该大力支持建立国家数据管理员,但不应该自己承担这样的角色。将数据和官方统计的责任混为一谈,既有可能破坏官方统计,也有可能不公正地对待以负责任的方式将数据作为一种资产开发的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assuring quality in the new data ecosystem: Mind the gap between data and statistics!
Drawing on recent work to develop the United Nations National Quality Assurance Frameworks Manual for Official Statistics to respond to the new data ecosystem, this paper addresses three important questions now facing the statistical community: (1) How can official statistics assure the quality of data from administrative and other sources? (2) Can the quality assurance framework for official statistics be applied to data as opposed to statistics? (3) What other implications does the difference between data and statistics have for the role of official statistics in the new data ecosystem? The paper argues that statistical offices should strongly support the establishment of national data stewards but should not take on such a role themselves. Mixing responsibilities for data and official statistics risks both undermining official statistics and not doing justice to the need to develop data as an asset in a responsible way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Journal of the IAOS
Statistical Journal of the IAOS Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: This is the flagship journal of the International Association for Official Statistics and is expected to be widely circulated and subscribed to by individuals and institutions in all parts of the world. The main aim of the Journal is to support the IAOS mission by publishing articles to promote the understanding and advancement of official statistics and to foster the development of effective and efficient official statistical services on a global basis. Papers are expected to be of wide interest to readers. Such papers may or may not contain strictly original material. All papers are refereed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信