从法律的力量到乌拉圭市政当局和公民参与行动的奇迹

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Julián González Scandizzi
{"title":"从法律的力量到乌拉圭市政当局和公民参与行动的奇迹","authors":"Julián González Scandizzi","doi":"10.22187/RFD2019N47A6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From their origin, the Uruguayan municipal governments incorporated the citizen participation postulate. However, the municipal legislation includes the normative content of this mandate as a generic principle, highly ambiguous and with limited operability. Faced with this, the attempt to legally stipulate mandatory mechanisms that local governments would have to replicate appears as an attractive alternative. This paper points out a set of critical arguments that warn about some potential problems generated by compulsory regulations of citizen participation. Based on the experience of other Latin-American countries, it is shown how this type of legislation ignores core conditions required for citizen participation became a contribution in order to democratize local governments. Especially, it is discussed the importance of the political will as an angular stone for succeed implementation. In the Uruguayan context, it is observed that different intensity degree of municipal authorities’ participative vocations is influenced by the programmatic and discursive traditions of the main political parties of the country. This circumstance would depict an additional obstacle for pro-participation laws application.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De la fuerza de la ley al milagro de la acción Municipios y participación ciudadana en Uruguay\",\"authors\":\"Julián González Scandizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.22187/RFD2019N47A6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From their origin, the Uruguayan municipal governments incorporated the citizen participation postulate. However, the municipal legislation includes the normative content of this mandate as a generic principle, highly ambiguous and with limited operability. Faced with this, the attempt to legally stipulate mandatory mechanisms that local governments would have to replicate appears as an attractive alternative. This paper points out a set of critical arguments that warn about some potential problems generated by compulsory regulations of citizen participation. Based on the experience of other Latin-American countries, it is shown how this type of legislation ignores core conditions required for citizen participation became a contribution in order to democratize local governments. Especially, it is discussed the importance of the political will as an angular stone for succeed implementation. In the Uruguayan context, it is observed that different intensity degree of municipal authorities’ participative vocations is influenced by the programmatic and discursive traditions of the main political parties of the country. This circumstance would depict an additional obstacle for pro-participation laws application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2019N47A6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2019N47A6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

乌拉圭的市政府从一开始就纳入了公民参与的假设。然而,市政立法将这一任务的规范性内容作为一项一般原则,高度模糊,可操作性有限。面对这种情况,试图在法律上规定地方政府必须复制的强制性机制似乎是一个有吸引力的选择。本文提出了一系列批评性论点,对公民参与的强制性规定可能产生的问题提出了警告。根据其他拉丁美洲国家的经验,这类立法忽略了公民参与成为促进地方政府民主化所需的核心条件。特别讨论了政治意愿作为成功实施的棱角石的重要性。在乌拉圭的情况下,可以观察到,市政当局参与工作的不同程度受到该国主要政党的纲领和话语传统的影响。这种情况将成为支持参与的法律适用的又一障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
De la fuerza de la ley al milagro de la acción Municipios y participación ciudadana en Uruguay
From their origin, the Uruguayan municipal governments incorporated the citizen participation postulate. However, the municipal legislation includes the normative content of this mandate as a generic principle, highly ambiguous and with limited operability. Faced with this, the attempt to legally stipulate mandatory mechanisms that local governments would have to replicate appears as an attractive alternative. This paper points out a set of critical arguments that warn about some potential problems generated by compulsory regulations of citizen participation. Based on the experience of other Latin-American countries, it is shown how this type of legislation ignores core conditions required for citizen participation became a contribution in order to democratize local governments. Especially, it is discussed the importance of the political will as an angular stone for succeed implementation. In the Uruguayan context, it is observed that different intensity degree of municipal authorities’ participative vocations is influenced by the programmatic and discursive traditions of the main political parties of the country. This circumstance would depict an additional obstacle for pro-participation laws application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信