F. Stephanie, Birkett John, O. Sharon, Daly Angela, C. Peter
{"title":"禁烟令对吸烟热点地区商业户外餐饮区的有限影响:个案研究","authors":"F. Stephanie, Birkett John, O. Sharon, Daly Angela, C. Peter","doi":"10.23937/2469-5793/1510110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: An evaluation of the implementation of smokefree commercial outdoor dining was carried out to evaluate proprietors’ awareness and preparedness for the implementation of Smoke-Free Outdoor Dining regulations in Liverpool, Australia. Methods: A pre-post assessment of the awareness and preparedness for smoke-free Commercial Outdoor Dining (COD) bans commencing in NSW on the 6 July 2015 was carried out at 19 COD premises in Liverpool’s Macquarie Mall by the Public Health Unit. Results: The study found limited effectiveness of the smoking bans in the area, despite a high level of awareness of key changes required and high level of preparedness for the smoke-free COD regulations. The majority of COD operators chose to provide a designated smoking area to allow patrons to continue to smoke legally. Over two thirds (69%) of operators were concerned/somewhat concerned about the impact of the bans on their business before the bans but decreased to 55% (10) after the bans. Conclusions: Once proprietors understood that they had options, a majority of COD operators chose to change their business operations in order to allow customers to lawfully continue to smoke. Implications for public health: Loopholes in COD regulations have resulted in consumers being increasingly exposed to smoke. A multi-sectoral approach is needed to review the legislation and protect consumers. ReSeARCh ARtiCle","PeriodicalId":91906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of family medicine and disease prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limited Impact of Smoking Bans on Commercial Outdoor Dining Area in a Smoking Hot Spot: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"F. Stephanie, Birkett John, O. Sharon, Daly Angela, C. Peter\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2469-5793/1510110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: An evaluation of the implementation of smokefree commercial outdoor dining was carried out to evaluate proprietors’ awareness and preparedness for the implementation of Smoke-Free Outdoor Dining regulations in Liverpool, Australia. Methods: A pre-post assessment of the awareness and preparedness for smoke-free Commercial Outdoor Dining (COD) bans commencing in NSW on the 6 July 2015 was carried out at 19 COD premises in Liverpool’s Macquarie Mall by the Public Health Unit. Results: The study found limited effectiveness of the smoking bans in the area, despite a high level of awareness of key changes required and high level of preparedness for the smoke-free COD regulations. The majority of COD operators chose to provide a designated smoking area to allow patrons to continue to smoke legally. Over two thirds (69%) of operators were concerned/somewhat concerned about the impact of the bans on their business before the bans but decreased to 55% (10) after the bans. Conclusions: Once proprietors understood that they had options, a majority of COD operators chose to change their business operations in order to allow customers to lawfully continue to smoke. Implications for public health: Loopholes in COD regulations have resulted in consumers being increasingly exposed to smoke. A multi-sectoral approach is needed to review the legislation and protect consumers. ReSeARCh ARtiCle\",\"PeriodicalId\":91906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of family medicine and disease prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of family medicine and disease prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of family medicine and disease prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Limited Impact of Smoking Bans on Commercial Outdoor Dining Area in a Smoking Hot Spot: A Case Study
Objectives: An evaluation of the implementation of smokefree commercial outdoor dining was carried out to evaluate proprietors’ awareness and preparedness for the implementation of Smoke-Free Outdoor Dining regulations in Liverpool, Australia. Methods: A pre-post assessment of the awareness and preparedness for smoke-free Commercial Outdoor Dining (COD) bans commencing in NSW on the 6 July 2015 was carried out at 19 COD premises in Liverpool’s Macquarie Mall by the Public Health Unit. Results: The study found limited effectiveness of the smoking bans in the area, despite a high level of awareness of key changes required and high level of preparedness for the smoke-free COD regulations. The majority of COD operators chose to provide a designated smoking area to allow patrons to continue to smoke legally. Over two thirds (69%) of operators were concerned/somewhat concerned about the impact of the bans on their business before the bans but decreased to 55% (10) after the bans. Conclusions: Once proprietors understood that they had options, a majority of COD operators chose to change their business operations in order to allow customers to lawfully continue to smoke. Implications for public health: Loopholes in COD regulations have resulted in consumers being increasingly exposed to smoke. A multi-sectoral approach is needed to review the legislation and protect consumers. ReSeARCh ARtiCle