将奥马哈系统翻译成英语并进行验证奥马哈系统简化术语

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Kontakt Pub Date : 2022-03-09 DOI:10.32725/kont.2022.007
R. Austin, Christie L. Martin, Clarence R. Jones, Sheng-Chieh Lu, Ratchada Jantraporn, Igor Nestrasil, K. Martin, K. Monsen
{"title":"将奥马哈系统翻译成英语并进行验证奥马哈系统简化术语","authors":"R. Austin, Christie L. Martin, Clarence R. Jones, Sheng-Chieh Lu, Ratchada Jantraporn, Igor Nestrasil, K. Martin, K. Monsen","doi":"10.32725/kont.2022.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: COVID-19 has caused a shift toward consumer-facing technology such as mobile health (mHealth) applications. However, most mHealth apps do not use accessible language. Standardized terminologies have potential to solve this problem but have not been simplified for consumer use. Methods: We used a standardized health terminology, the Omaha System, as the framework to develop the Simplified Omaha System Terms (SOST) for use within a mHealth application, MyStrengths + MyHealth. Plain language principles informed the SOST development in three phases, a community-validation focus group enabled feedback from diverse end-users, a readability assessment provide validation to the desired goal readability level. Results: The community-validation members (n = 19) ages ranged from 22 to 74;51% male, 84% people of color, and 21% college educated. The reading level of the final SOST averaged 3.86 on the Coleman–Liau Index (fourth grade). A case study showed meaningful whole-person health data were generated in a community-led study during COVID-19. Conclusions: Community validation and readability assessment demonstrated accessible language for a clinical terminology. The SOST was deployed successfully in MyStrengths + My Health and in a community-led study. The Omaha System as a framework for the SOST may enable the data to be integrated with clinical datasets. Future research should focus on validation of SOST in additional languages and integration within electronic health platforms. © 2022 The Authors.","PeriodicalId":17818,"journal":{"name":"Kontakt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation and validation of the Omaha System into English language simplified Omaha System terms\",\"authors\":\"R. Austin, Christie L. Martin, Clarence R. Jones, Sheng-Chieh Lu, Ratchada Jantraporn, Igor Nestrasil, K. Martin, K. Monsen\",\"doi\":\"10.32725/kont.2022.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: COVID-19 has caused a shift toward consumer-facing technology such as mobile health (mHealth) applications. However, most mHealth apps do not use accessible language. Standardized terminologies have potential to solve this problem but have not been simplified for consumer use. Methods: We used a standardized health terminology, the Omaha System, as the framework to develop the Simplified Omaha System Terms (SOST) for use within a mHealth application, MyStrengths + MyHealth. Plain language principles informed the SOST development in three phases, a community-validation focus group enabled feedback from diverse end-users, a readability assessment provide validation to the desired goal readability level. Results: The community-validation members (n = 19) ages ranged from 22 to 74;51% male, 84% people of color, and 21% college educated. The reading level of the final SOST averaged 3.86 on the Coleman–Liau Index (fourth grade). A case study showed meaningful whole-person health data were generated in a community-led study during COVID-19. Conclusions: Community validation and readability assessment demonstrated accessible language for a clinical terminology. The SOST was deployed successfully in MyStrengths + My Health and in a community-led study. The Omaha System as a framework for the SOST may enable the data to be integrated with clinical datasets. Future research should focus on validation of SOST in additional languages and integration within electronic health platforms. © 2022 The Authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kontakt\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kontakt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2022.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kontakt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/kont.2022.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:2019冠状病毒病已导致向面向消费者的技术(如移动医疗(mHealth)应用程序)的转变。然而,大多数移动健康应用程序不使用无障碍语言。标准化的术语有可能解决这个问题,但还没有简化以供消费者使用。方法:我们使用标准化的健康术语“奥马哈系统”作为框架,开发简化奥马哈系统术语(SOST),用于移动健康应用程序“我的力量+我的健康”。简单的语言原则将SOST的开发分为三个阶段,一个社区验证焦点小组从不同的最终用户那里获得反馈,一个可读性评估提供了对预期目标可读性水平的验证。结果:社区验证成员(n = 19)年龄在22 - 74岁之间,51%为男性,84%为有色人种,21%为大学学历。期末SOST的阅读水平在Coleman-Liau指数(四年级)上平均为3.86。一项案例研究显示,在COVID-19期间,一项社区主导的研究产生了有意义的全人健康数据。结论:社区验证和可读性评估证明了临床术语的可访问语言。SOST在“我的力量+我的健康”和一项社区主导的研究中得到了成功的应用。奥马哈系统作为SOST的框架可以使数据与临床数据集集成。未来的研究应该集中在其他语言的SOST验证和电子健康平台的集成上。©2022作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation and validation of the Omaha System into English language simplified Omaha System terms
Purpose: COVID-19 has caused a shift toward consumer-facing technology such as mobile health (mHealth) applications. However, most mHealth apps do not use accessible language. Standardized terminologies have potential to solve this problem but have not been simplified for consumer use. Methods: We used a standardized health terminology, the Omaha System, as the framework to develop the Simplified Omaha System Terms (SOST) for use within a mHealth application, MyStrengths + MyHealth. Plain language principles informed the SOST development in three phases, a community-validation focus group enabled feedback from diverse end-users, a readability assessment provide validation to the desired goal readability level. Results: The community-validation members (n = 19) ages ranged from 22 to 74;51% male, 84% people of color, and 21% college educated. The reading level of the final SOST averaged 3.86 on the Coleman–Liau Index (fourth grade). A case study showed meaningful whole-person health data were generated in a community-led study during COVID-19. Conclusions: Community validation and readability assessment demonstrated accessible language for a clinical terminology. The SOST was deployed successfully in MyStrengths + My Health and in a community-led study. The Omaha System as a framework for the SOST may enable the data to be integrated with clinical datasets. Future research should focus on validation of SOST in additional languages and integration within electronic health platforms. © 2022 The Authors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kontakt
Kontakt Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles are published in two sections: 1. The nursing section focuses on the support of nursing via the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based peer reviewed findings. The section serves as a forum for the exchange of knowledge relating to the education of nurses, the exchange of knowledge and skills in clinical nursing, the development of nursing concepts and innovation in health policy. It deals with the legal and ethical issues, nurses'' views on patient safety, nursing activities in multicultural environments and progress in nursing practice. The main topic areas include: -Clinical nursing -Management in nursing -Evidence-based nursing -Multicultural nursing -Nursing ethics -Quality of life in illness 2. The social sciences in health section accepts contributions relating to any aspect of health from a broad perspective of the social sciences, including the medical impact on society. It also accepts contributions dealing with ethical issues in health care, risk management and the impact of political and economic conditions in the field of health. The aim of the articles is to develop understanding and to provide practical application of quantitative and qualitative research methods concerning the management, application or use of the research in health and social care. The main topic areas include: -Social determinants of health -Social work and health -Legal and economic issues concerning health -Ethical issues in social sciences and health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信