比较磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描耳蜗测量的准确性:迈向无辐射耳蜗植入的一步

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Anurita Swarup , Vinusree Karakkandy , Preetam Chappity , Suprava Naik , Sanjay Kumar Behera , Pradipta Kumar Parida , Mohnish Grover , Gaurav Gupta , Prajna Paramita Giri , Saurav Sarkar , Pradeep Pradhan , Dillip Kumar Samal , Aswathi Kallyadan Veetil , Asutosh Adhikari , Saurav Nayak
{"title":"比较磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描耳蜗测量的准确性:迈向无辐射耳蜗植入的一步","authors":"Anurita Swarup ,&nbsp;Vinusree Karakkandy ,&nbsp;Preetam Chappity ,&nbsp;Suprava Naik ,&nbsp;Sanjay Kumar Behera ,&nbsp;Pradipta Kumar Parida ,&nbsp;Mohnish Grover ,&nbsp;Gaurav Gupta ,&nbsp;Prajna Paramita Giri ,&nbsp;Saurav Sarkar ,&nbsp;Pradeep Pradhan ,&nbsp;Dillip Kumar Samal ,&nbsp;Aswathi Kallyadan Veetil ,&nbsp;Asutosh Adhikari ,&nbsp;Saurav Nayak","doi":"10.1016/j.joto.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are commonly employed in pre-operative evaluation for cochlear implant surgery. However, with a decrease in the age of implantation, even minor radiation exposure can cause detrimental effects on children over their lifetime. The current study compares different cochlear measurements from CT and MRI scans and evaluates the feasibility of using only an MRI scan for radiological evaluation before cochlear implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal observational study was conducted on 94 ears/47 children, employing CT and MRI scans. The CT and MRI scan measurements include, A value, B value, Cochlear duct length (CDL), two-turn cochlear length, alpha and beta angles to look for cochlear orientation. Cochlear nerve diameter was measured using MRI. The values were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean difference between measurements from CT and MRI scans for A value, B value, CDL, and two-turn cochlear length values was 0.567 ± 0.413 mm, 0.406 ± 0.368 mm, 2.365 ± 1.675 mm, and 2.063 ± 1.477 mm respectively without any significant difference. The alpha and beta angle measures were comparable, with no statistically significant difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study suggests that MRI scans can be the only radiological investigation needed with no radiation risk and reduces the cost of cochlear implant program in the paediatric population. There is no significant difference between the measurements obtained from CT and MRI scans. However, observed discrepancies in cochlear measurements across different populations require regionally or race-specific standardized values to ensure accurate diagnosis and precision in cochlear implant surgery. This aspect must be addressed to ensure positive outcomes for patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing accuracy of cochlear measurements on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: A step towards radiation-free cochlear implantation\",\"authors\":\"Anurita Swarup ,&nbsp;Vinusree Karakkandy ,&nbsp;Preetam Chappity ,&nbsp;Suprava Naik ,&nbsp;Sanjay Kumar Behera ,&nbsp;Pradipta Kumar Parida ,&nbsp;Mohnish Grover ,&nbsp;Gaurav Gupta ,&nbsp;Prajna Paramita Giri ,&nbsp;Saurav Sarkar ,&nbsp;Pradeep Pradhan ,&nbsp;Dillip Kumar Samal ,&nbsp;Aswathi Kallyadan Veetil ,&nbsp;Asutosh Adhikari ,&nbsp;Saurav Nayak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joto.2023.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are commonly employed in pre-operative evaluation for cochlear implant surgery. However, with a decrease in the age of implantation, even minor radiation exposure can cause detrimental effects on children over their lifetime. The current study compares different cochlear measurements from CT and MRI scans and evaluates the feasibility of using only an MRI scan for radiological evaluation before cochlear implantation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal observational study was conducted on 94 ears/47 children, employing CT and MRI scans. The CT and MRI scan measurements include, A value, B value, Cochlear duct length (CDL), two-turn cochlear length, alpha and beta angles to look for cochlear orientation. Cochlear nerve diameter was measured using MRI. The values were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean difference between measurements from CT and MRI scans for A value, B value, CDL, and two-turn cochlear length values was 0.567 ± 0.413 mm, 0.406 ± 0.368 mm, 2.365 ± 1.675 mm, and 2.063 ± 1.477 mm respectively without any significant difference. The alpha and beta angle measures were comparable, with no statistically significant difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study suggests that MRI scans can be the only radiological investigation needed with no radiation risk and reduces the cost of cochlear implant program in the paediatric population. There is no significant difference between the measurements obtained from CT and MRI scans. However, observed discrepancies in cochlear measurements across different populations require regionally or race-specific standardized values to ensure accurate diagnosis and precision in cochlear implant surgery. This aspect must be addressed to ensure positive outcomes for patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293023000508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1672293023000508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)是人工耳蜗术前评估的常用手段。然而,随着植入年龄的降低,即使是轻微的辐射暴露也会对儿童的一生造成有害影响。目前的研究比较了CT和MRI扫描的不同耳蜗测量结果,并评估了在人工耳蜗植入前仅使用MRI扫描进行放射学评估的可行性。方法采用CT和MRI对94耳/47例儿童进行纵向观察。CT和MRI扫描测量包括:A值、B值、耳蜗管长度(CDL)、两圈耳蜗长度、α角和β角寻找耳蜗方位。采用MRI测量耳蜗神经直径。对数值进行比较。结果CT与MRI测量的A值、B值、CDL、两转耳蜗长度值的平均差值分别为0.567±0.413 mm、0.406±0.368 mm、2.365±1.675 mm、2.063±1.477 mm,差异无统计学意义。α和β角度测量具有可比性,没有统计学上的显著差异。结论本研究提示MRI扫描可作为唯一的放射学检查,无辐射风险,降低了儿童人群人工耳蜗项目的成本。CT和MRI扫描的测量结果没有显著差异。然而,在不同人群中观察到的耳蜗测量差异需要地区或种族特定的标准化值,以确保人工耳蜗手术的准确诊断和准确性。这方面必须得到解决,以确保患者的积极结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing accuracy of cochlear measurements on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: A step towards radiation-free cochlear implantation

Objective

Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are commonly employed in pre-operative evaluation for cochlear implant surgery. However, with a decrease in the age of implantation, even minor radiation exposure can cause detrimental effects on children over their lifetime. The current study compares different cochlear measurements from CT and MRI scans and evaluates the feasibility of using only an MRI scan for radiological evaluation before cochlear implantation.

Methods

A longitudinal observational study was conducted on 94 ears/47 children, employing CT and MRI scans. The CT and MRI scan measurements include, A value, B value, Cochlear duct length (CDL), two-turn cochlear length, alpha and beta angles to look for cochlear orientation. Cochlear nerve diameter was measured using MRI. The values were compared.

Results

The mean difference between measurements from CT and MRI scans for A value, B value, CDL, and two-turn cochlear length values was 0.567 ± 0.413 mm, 0.406 ± 0.368 mm, 2.365 ± 1.675 mm, and 2.063 ± 1.477 mm respectively without any significant difference. The alpha and beta angle measures were comparable, with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion

The study suggests that MRI scans can be the only radiological investigation needed with no radiation risk and reduces the cost of cochlear implant program in the paediatric population. There is no significant difference between the measurements obtained from CT and MRI scans. However, observed discrepancies in cochlear measurements across different populations require regionally or race-specific standardized values to ensure accurate diagnosis and precision in cochlear implant surgery. This aspect must be addressed to ensure positive outcomes for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Otology
Journal of Otology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
461
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Otology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to both clinical and basic science aspects of auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal welcomes submissions describing original experimental research that may improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying problems of basic or clinical significance and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines. Journal of Otology welcomes contributions from scholars in all countries and regions across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信